1887
image of Morphological complexity and rated writing proficiency
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Linguistic complexity measures are used to describe second language (L2) performance and assess levels of proficiency and development. Although morphology is considered crucial in L2 acquisition, morphological complexity has been relatively neglected, hindering comprehensive views of grammatical complexity in L2. This article presents an application of a recently proposed metric of morphological diversity, the Morphological Complexity Index (MCI), in an L2 Spanish corpus of 113 essays classified into four proficiency levels by expert evaluators. The aim of the study is to investigate the relationships of MCI with subjectively rated proficiency and with other four quantitative measures of L2 complexity. Results indicate that morphological complexity, as measured by MCI, does not vary significantly across proficiency levels in this corpus. The MCI shows significant correlations with lexical but not with syntactic complexity measures. Findings are interpreted in the light of the characteristics of the corpus and the acquisition of the Spanish verbal system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.20009.del
2021-04-14
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alcoba, S.
    (1999) La flexión verbal. InV. Demonte & I. Bosque (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (vol. 3). Entre la oración y el discurso. Morfología (pp.4915–4992). Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
    American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2012) ACTFL proficiency guidelines. www.actfl.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bermúdez-Otero, R.
    (2013) The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus, 25(1), 3–103. doi:  10.1515/probus‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brezina, V., & Pallotti, G.
    (2015) Morphological complexity tool. corpora.lancs.ac.uk/vocab/analyse_morph.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2019) Morphological complexity in written L2 texts. Second Language Research, 35(1), 99–119. doi:  10.1177/0267658316643125
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316643125 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
    (2012) Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. InA. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.21–46). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulté, B., & Roothooft, H.
    (2020) Investigating the interrelationship between rated L2 proficiency and linguistic complexity in L2 speech. System, 91, 102246. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2020.102246
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102246 [Google Scholar]
  8. Busquets, L., & Bonzi, L.
    (1993) Los verbos en español. Verbum, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Collentine, J.
    (1995) The development of complex syntax and the selection of mood by foreign language learners of Spanish. Hispania, 78(1), 122–135. 10.2307/345232
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345232 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2010) The Acquisition and Teaching of the Spanish Subjunctive: An Update on Current Findings. Hispania, 93(1), 39–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Consorcio Español Lengua Segunda o Extranjera (CELSE)
    Consorcio Español Lengua Segunda o Extranjera (CELSE). (n.d.). CELU: Certificado de Español Lengua y Uso. RetrievedFebruary 10, 2020, fromhttps://www.celu.edu.ar.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. https://www.coe.int/en/web/language-policy/cefr.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Crossley, S.
    (2020) Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 415–443. doi:  10.17239/jowr‑2020.11.03.01
    https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01 [Google Scholar]
  14. Daller, H., & Xue, H.
    (2007) Lexical richness and the oral proficiency of Chinese EFL students. InH. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp.150–164). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667268 [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, M., & Hayward Davies, K.
    (2018) A Frequency Dictionary of Spanish (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. De Clercq, B., & Housen, A.
    (2019) The development of morphological complexity: A cross-linguistic study of L2 French and English. Second Language Research, 35(1), 71–97. doi:  10.1177/0267658316674506
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316674506 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kusters, W.
    (2008) Complexity in linguistic theory, language learning and language change. InM. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp.23–41). John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 10.1075/slcs.94.03kus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.03kus [Google Scholar]
  18. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S.
    (2016) The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12–24. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lan, G., Liu, Q., & Staples, S.
    (2019) Grammatical complexity: ‘What Does It Mean’ and ‘So What’ for L2 writing classrooms?Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100673. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100673
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100673 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lu, X., & Ai, H.
    (2015) Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 16–27. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3a). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P.
    (2004) Lexical Diversity and Language Development. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:  10.1057/9780230511804
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511804 [Google Scholar]
  23. Miestamo, M.
    (2008) Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. InM. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp.23–41). John BenjaminsAmsterdam/Philadelphia. 10.1075/slcs.94
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94 [Google Scholar]
  24. Montrul, S.
    (2004) The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lald.37
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.37 [Google Scholar]
  25. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp044
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044 [Google Scholar]
  26. Olbertz, H.
    (1998) Verbal periphrases in a functional grammar of Spanish. De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110820881
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820881 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pallotti, G.
    (2009) CAF: Defining, Refining and Differentiating Constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp045 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2015a) Una nuova misura della complessità linguistica: l’Indice di Complessità Morfologica (ICM). Rassegna Italiana Di Linguistica Applicata (RILA), 2, 195–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2015b) A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research, 31(1), 117–134. doi:  10.1177/0267658314536435
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536435 [Google Scholar]
  30. Polio, C., & Shea, M. C.
    (2014) An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10–27. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Presson, N., Sagarra, N., MacWhinney, B., & KowaIsky, J.
    (2013) Compositional production in Spanish second language conjugation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 808–828. doi:  10.1017/S136672891200065X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891200065X [Google Scholar]
  32. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española (2008) Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual (CREA) – versión 3.2. www.rae.es.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Roca, I.
    (2010) Theme vowel allomorphy in Spanish verb inflection: An autosegmental optimality account. Lingua, 120(2), 408–434. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Slabakova, R.
    (2014) The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 46(4), 543–559.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. The jamovi project
    The jamovi project (2020) jamovi (version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.20009.del
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.20009.del
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error