1887
image of Cantonese and Korean speakers’ comprehension and appreciation of English textual humor
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study explored how L1 Cantonese and L1 Korean speakers would comprehend and appreciate L2 English humor, and whether their L1 background, English proficiency, and the type of humor would play as moderators. For this study, 69 Cantonese and 76 Korean undergraduate students answered a questionnaire that contained 30 English humor items in various types, i.e., lexical, morphological, syntactic, phonological, and cultural. In addition, five intermediate and five advanced participants from each L1 group participated in semi-structured interviews to elicit their English learning and use experiences and beliefs in the role of humor in English learning. The results revealed that humor comprehension scores were significantly higher for Cantonese speakers and for participants with advanced English proficiency, and morphological humor was the easiest to comprehend. Open-ended responses and interview protocols also demonstrated that different contexts of English learning and use may affect the participants’ ability to enjoy and appreciate English humor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.21008.fan
2022-10-13
2023-01-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. A’Beckett, L.
    (2013) Strategies to discredit opponents: Russian presentations of events in countries of the former Soviet Union. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17, 133–156. 10.2478/plc‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarons, D.
    (2012) Jokes and the linguistic mind. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203814741
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814741 [Google Scholar]
  3. Attardo, S.
    (2001) Humorous Texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110887969
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1997) The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4, 395–420. 10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2008) Semantics and pragmatics of humor. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(6), 1203–1215. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00107.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00107.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Azizinezhad, M., & Hashemi, M.
    (2011) Humour: A pedagogical tool for language learners. Procedia–– Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2093–2098. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.407
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.407 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baayen, R. H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bell, N. D.
    (2007) How native and non-native English speakers adapt to humor in intercultural interaction. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20, 27–48. 10.1515/HUMOR.2007.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2007.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2009) Learning about and through humor in the second language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 13(3), 241–258. 10.1177/1362168809104697
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809104697 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2017) Humor and second language development. InS. Attardo (Ed). The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp.444–455). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑31
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-31 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bell, N., & Attardo, S.
    (2010) Failed humor: Issues in non-native speakers’ appreciation and understanding of humor. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(3), 423–447. 10.1515/iprg.2010.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.019 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clark, D. A.
    (1968) Jokes, Puns, and Riddles. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Deneire, M.
    (1995) Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 8(3), 285–298. 10.1515/humr.1995.8.3.285
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1995.8.3.285 [Google Scholar]
  14. Comparing scores
    Comparing scores. (n.d.). RetrievedMarch 02, 2021, fromhttps://www.ets.org/toefl/score-users/scores-admissions/compare/
  15. Gelman, A., & Hill, J.
    (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goatly, A.
    (2012) Meaning and humour. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791536
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791536 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grice, H. P.
    (1975) Logic and conversation. InSpeech acts (pp.41–58). Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hay, J.
    (2001) The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 14, 55–82. 10.1515/humr.14.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoke, H.
    (1965) More jokes. New York: Franklin Watts.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsin, A. L.
    (2006) Comprehension of English Jokes in Chinese EFL Learners. In2006 International Conference on English Instruction and Assessment. April. Chung-Cheng Univ. Jia-yi, ROC.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kern, R. G.
    (2008) Literacy as a new organizing principle for foreign language education. InP. Patrikis (Ed.), Reading between the lines: Perspectives on foreign language literacy (pp.40–60). New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kristmanson, P.
    (2000) Affect: in the Second Language Classroom: How to create an emotional climate. Reflexions, 19(2), 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Laughfactory.com
    Laughfactory.com. Retrieved8 August 2020, fromlaughfactory.com/jokes
  24. Lew, R.
    (1997) Towards a taxonomy of linguistic jokes. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 31, 123–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lucas, T.
    (2005) Language awareness and comprehension through puns among ESL learners. Language Awareness, 14(4), 221–238. 10.1080/09658410508668838
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668838 [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin, R.
    (2007) The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. London, England: Elsevier Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012372564‑6/50024‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372564-6/50024-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Oaks, D. D.
    (1994) Creating structural ambiguities in humor: getting English grammar to cooperate. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research7(4), 377–401. 10.1515/humr.1994.7.4.377
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1994.7.4.377 [Google Scholar]
  28. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. 10.1111/lang.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  29. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLwww.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Raskin, V.
    (2011) On Oring on GTVH. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(2), 223–231. 10.1515/HUMR.2011.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2012) The hidden media humor and hidden theory. InJ. Chovanec & I. Ermida (Eds). Language and humour in the media (pp.45–66). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ritchie, G.
    (2004) The linguistic analysis of jokes. New York: Roudedg. 10.4324/9780203406953
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203406953 [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosenbloom, J.
    (1976) Biggest riddle book in the world. Sterling Publishing Company, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ross, A.
    (2005) The language of humour. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203984567
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984567 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmitz, J. R.
    (2002) Humor as a pedagogical tool in foreign language and translation courses. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 15(1), 89–114. 10.1515/humr.2002.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.007 [Google Scholar]
  36. Semiz, Ö.
    (2014) EFL learners’ understanding of linguistic ambiguity in language-based jokes. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 2(2).1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Shardakova, M.
    (2010) How to be funny in a second language: Pragmatics of L2 humor. InR. D. Brecht, L. A. Verbitskaja, M. D. Lekic, & W. P. Rivers (Eds.), Mnemosynon. Studies on language and culture in the Russophone World: A collection of papers presented to Dan E. Davidson by his students and colleagues (pp.288–310). Moscow, Russia: Azbukovnik, Institut russkogo jazyka, RAN.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2016) American learners’ comprehension of Russian textual humor. The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 466–483. 10.1111/modl.12329
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12329 [Google Scholar]
  39. Shiverly, R. L.
    (2013) Learning to be funny in Spanish during study abroad: L2 humour development. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 930–946. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12043.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12043.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Shultz, T. R., & Horibe, F.
    (1974) Development of the appreciation of verbal jokes. Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 13–20. 10.1037/h0035549
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035549 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stageberg, N. C.
    (1966) Structural ambiguity: some sources. The English Journal, 55(5), 558–563. 10.2307/812198
    https://doi.org/10.2307/812198 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wulf, D.
    (2010) A humour competence curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 155–169. 10.5054/tq.2010.215250
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.215250 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.21008.fan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.21008.fan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error