Volume 174, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Learners’ self-efficacy plays a crucial role in achieving success in second language (L2) acquisition. As a determinant of success and failure, self-efficacy should be measured appropriately and effectively using empirically and theoretically based instruments. Many of the current measures, however, are either not necessarily designed to assess self-efficacy in L2 learning, or they are lengthy, making them impractical to use alongside other instruments. The purpose of this study was therefore to develop and validate a new 11-item Questionnaire of Self-Efficacy in Learning a Foreign Language (QSLL). In Study 1, the initial items were piloted with 323 English as a foreign language (EFL) learners from three universities in Turkey. In Study 2, a revised version of the questionnaire was administered to 701 EFL learners from an additional three Turkish universities. The analyses supported a bifactor model over the other four models tested. The bifactor model had one general L2 self-efficacy factor that underlined each of the items. Separately, there were two specific factors, namely L2 reception (i.e., reading and listening) self-efficacy and L2 production (i.e., speaking and writing) self-efficacy. Empirical evidence supporting measurement invariance and predictive validity were also provided. Overall, the results show strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the QSLL. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, (ACTFL)
    American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, (ACTFL) (1986) ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Yonkers, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anam, S., & Stracke, E.
    (2020) The role of self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language among young Indonesians. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 1–21. 10.1002/tesj.440
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.440 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anyadubalu, C.
    (2010) Self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance in the english language among middle-school students in english language program in Satri Si Suriyothai, Bangkok. International Journal of Social Science, 5(3), 193–198. 10.1999/1307‑6892/2271
    https://doi.org/10.1999/1307-6892/2271 [Google Scholar]
  4. Asakereh, A., & Dehghannezhad, M.
    (2015) Student satisfaction with EFL speaking classes: Relating speaking self-efficacy and skills achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 345–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai, B., Chao, G. C. N., & Wang, C.
    (2019) The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and English language learning achievement in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 208–221. 10.1002/tesq.439
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.439 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai, B., & Wang, J.
    (2020) The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language teaching research. 10.1177/1362168820933190
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bandura, A.
    (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of controlMacmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2006) Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(307–337)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonyadi, A., Nikou, F. R., & Shahbaz, S.
    (2012) The relationship between EFL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and their language learning strategy use. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 113. 10.5539/elt.v5n8p113
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n8p113 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brislin, R. W.
    (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. 10.1177/135910457000100301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, F. F.
    (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. 10.1080/10705510701301834
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 [Google Scholar]
  13. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J.
    (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessmentCambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2020) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available atwww.coe.int/lang-cefr
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DeVellis, R. F.
    (2003) Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2000) Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 519–538. 10.1348/000709900158281
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158281 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J.
    (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272. 10.1037/1082‑989X.4.3.272
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 [Google Scholar]
  19. Field, A.
    (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th Edition. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghonsooly, B., and M. Elahi
    (2010) Learners self-efficacy in reading and its relation to foreign language reading anxiety and reading achievement. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 53(127): 45–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Graham, J. W., Van Horn, M. L., & Taylor, B. J.
    (2012) Dealing with the problem of having too many variables in the imputation model. InJ. W. Graham (Ed.), Missing data (pp.213–228). New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑4018‑5_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4018-5_9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Han, J., & Hiver, P.
    (2018) Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 401, 44–59. 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris, J.
    (2022) Measuring listening and speaking self-efficacy in EFL contexts: The development of the Communicative SE Questionnaire. Language Teaching Research, Advanced online publication. 10.1177/13621688221091608
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221091608 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hetthong, R., & Teo, A.
    (2013) Does writing self-efficacy correlate with and predict writing performance?International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1), 157–167. 10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.157
    https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.157 [Google Scholar]
  25. Horwitz, E. K.
    (1987) Surveying student beliefs about language learning. InA. L. Wenden, & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.119–129) Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hsieh, P. P., & Kang, H.
    (2010) Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606–627. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00570.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang, C.
    (2013) Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. 10.1007/s10212‑011‑0097‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, D. H., Wang, C., Ahn, H. S., & Bong, M.
    (2015) English language learners’ self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and individual differences, 381, 136–142. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, D. H., C. Wang, and T. N. N. Truong
    (2021) Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale for English Language Learners in Vietnam. Language Teaching Research, Online First Publication. 10.1177/13621688211027852.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211027852 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kutuk, G., Putwain, D. W., Kaye, L. K., & Garrett, B.
    (2022) Relations between gender stereotyping and foreign language attainment: The mediating role of language learners’ anxiety and self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1). 10.1111/bjep.12446
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12446 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lavrakas, P. J.
    (2008) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781412963947
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947 [Google Scholar]
  32. Leeming, P.
    (2017) A longitudinal investigation into english speaking self-efficacy in a japanese language classroom. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 12. 10.1186/s40862‑017‑0035‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0035-x [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Y., & Wang, C.
    (2010) An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 144–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Loewen, S.
    (2014) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203117811
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203117811 [Google Scholar]
  35. Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R.
    (2007) The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338–352. 10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z.
    (2004) In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K.
    (2019) The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331–353. 10.1037/edu0000281
    https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281 [Google Scholar]
  38. McDermott, M. A. N., & Palchanes, K.
    (1994) A literature review of the critical elements in translation theory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(2), 113–118. 10.1111/j.1547‑5069.1994.tb00928.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00928.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Mercer, S., & Williams, M.
    (2014) Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783091362
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091362 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mills, N.
    (2014) Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. InS. Mercer, & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp.6–22). Multilingual Matters Bristol, England. 10.21832/9781783091362‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091362-003 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C.
    (2006) A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 276–295. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2006.tb02266.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Mills, N., & Peron, M.
    (2009) Global simulation and writing self-beliefs of intermediate French students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics: Special Issue on Learning and Teaching L2 Writing, 1561, 239–273. 10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034436
    https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034436 [Google Scholar]
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O.
    (2019) Mplus version 8 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H.
    (1994) Psychological theory. New York: MacGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Oxford, R. L.
    (1990) Strategy inventory for language learning. InR. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know (pp.283–300) Heinle & Heinle, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pajares, F.
    (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. 10.3102/00346543066004543
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H.
    (2002) Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. InJ. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement, pp.3–21. Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012064455‑1/50004‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50004-X [Google Scholar]
  48. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D.
    (2005) Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs. InMarch, H., Craven, R., & McInerney, D. (eds.). New frontiers for self-research. Greenwich, CT: IAP.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J.
    (1991) A manual for the use of the motivational strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P.
    (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. 10.1037/0021‑9010.88.5.879
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J.
    (2021) Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: a mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–48. 10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753 [Google Scholar]
  52. Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G.
    (2010) Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 544–559. 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477 [Google Scholar]
  53. Rust, J., & Golombock, S.
    (1989) Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. Routledge, London
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Russell, V., & Murphy-Judy, K.
    (2020) Teaching language online: A guide to designing, developing, and delivering online, blended, and flipped language courses. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429426483
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429426483 [Google Scholar]
  55. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F.
    (2009) Self-efficacy theory. InK. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp.35–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Schmenk, B.
    (2004) Languagelearning: A feminine domain? The role of stereotyping in constructing gendered learner identities. TESOL Quarterly, 381, 514–524. 10.2307/3588352
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588352 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sun, T., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., & Liu, L.
    (2021) Relationship between second language English writing self-efficacy and achievement: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 531, 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100817
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100817 [Google Scholar]
  58. Teng, L. S., Sun, P. P., & Xu, L.
    (2018) Conceptualizing writing self-efficacy in English as a foreign language context: scale validation through structural equation modeling. TESOL Quarterly, 521, 911–942. 10.1002/tesq.432
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.432 [Google Scholar]
  59. Truong, T. N. N., & Wang, C.
    (2019) Understanding Vietnamese college students’ self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. System, 841, 123–132. 10.1016/j.system.2019.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang, C., Kim, D., Bai, R., & Hu, J.
    (2014) Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for english language learners in China. System, 441, 24–33. 10.1016/j.system.2014.01.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.015 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang, C., Kim, D., Bong, M., & Ahn, H. S.
    (2013) Examining measurement properties of an English self-efficacy scale for English language learners in Korea. International Journal of Educational Research, 591, 24–34. 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  62. West, R., Guven, A., & Ergenekon, T.
    (2015) The state of English in higher education in Turkey. A baseline study. Ankara: Yorum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., & Sawalani, G. M.
    (2011) On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. 10.1037/12350‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1037/12350-003 [Google Scholar]
  64. Winke, P.
    (2014) Testing hypotheses about language learning using structural equation modeling. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 341, 102–122. 10.1017/S0267190514000075
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000075 [Google Scholar]
  65. Woodrow, L.
    (2011) College english writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522. 10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.017 [Google Scholar]
  66. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A.
    (2006) Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The counseling psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. 10.1177/0011000006288127
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127 [Google Scholar]
  67. Yang, N.
    (1999) The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27(4), 515–535. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00048‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00048-2 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error