1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Exploring the interplay between task-readiness factors and task complexity in L2 writing performance and anxiety
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between task-readiness factors, task complexity, and their impact on L2 writing task performance and anxiety in the task-based language teaching (TBLT) domain. The study aimed to address gaps in the TBLT literature by investigating the combined effects of task repetition, task rehearsal, and task complexity on different constructs of L2 writing, including syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF), as well as their effects on L2 writing anxiety. The study involved 90 undergraduate ESL students enrolled in advanced academic writing courses at an American university. Participants completed an L2 writing anxiety questionnaire before performing two argumentative writing tasks of varying cognitive complexity, spaced one week apart. After the initial task performances, a perception questionnaire was completed to validate assumptions about cognitive task complexity. The participants then repeated the same writing tasks within the same time interval. Results indicated that task readiness generally improved all CALF measures. Task repetition resulted in more accurate and lexically and syntactically complex writing while task rehearsal led to greater fluency. All the CALF measures, except for accuracy, varied as a function of task complexity. Furthermore, the participants experienced lower levels of L2 writing in the simple task and the second performance.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23003.abd
2025-05-16
2025-06-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.23003.abd
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdi Tabari, M.
    (2022) Investigating the interactions between L2 writing processes and products under different task planning time conditions. Journal of Second Language Writing, , 100871. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100871
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100871 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2023) Unpacking the effects of different lengths of pre-task planning time: L2 writing outcomes and learners’ perceptions. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2023.2213237
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2023.2213237 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdi Tabari, M., & Cho, M.
    (2022) Task sequencing and L2 writing development: Exploring the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/13621688221090922
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221090922 [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdi Tabari, M., Khezrlou, S., & Tian, Y.
    (2022) Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2022‑0123
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0123 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2023a) Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 written production: effects of task complexity and task repetition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/17501229.2023.2211955
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2211955 [Google Scholar]
  6. Abdi Tabari, M., Lu, X., & Wang, Y.
    (2023b) The effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in L2 writing: An exploratory study. System, , 103021. 10.1016/j.system.2023.103021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103021 [Google Scholar]
  7. Abdi Tabari, M., Khezrlou, S., & Ghanbar, H.
    (2024) Task repetition versus task rehearsal: Understanding effects of task-readiness factors and elemental genres on L2 writing task performance. Language Teaching Research, (). 10.1177/13621688241249689
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241249689 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ai, H., & Lu, X.
    (2013) A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing. InDíaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N., Thompson, P. (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.59.15ai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59.15ai [Google Scholar]
  9. Amiryousefi, M.
    (2016) The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: A focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (), –. 10.1080/09588221.2016.1170040
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1170040 [Google Scholar]
  10. Azizzadeh, L., & Dobakhti, L.
    (2015) The effect of task repetition on complexity and accuracy of Iranian high-intermediate EFL learners’ narrative writing performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, (), –. 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.17
     https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.17 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baba, K., & Nitta, R.
    (2011) Dynamic effects of repeating a timed writing task in two EFL university courses: Multi-element text analysis with Coh-Metrix. InP. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum (Eds.), Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution (pp.–). IGI Global.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Baba, K., & Nitta, A.
    (2014) Phase transitions in the development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12033
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bui, G. H. Y.
    (2014) Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. InP. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.–). John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bui, G., & Yu, R.
    (2021) Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal. InN. P. Sudharshana & L. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Task-Based language teaching and assessment: Contemporary reflections from across the world (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑16‑4226‑5_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bygate, M.
    (2018) Introduction. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.intro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.intro [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, Y. S.
    (2004) A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, (), –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) Development and preliminary validation of four brief measures of L2 language-skill-specific anxiety. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2017.06.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  18. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2018) Task repetition for language learning: A perspective from skill acquisition theory. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.01dek
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.01dek [Google Scholar]
  19. Divsar, H.
    (2022) The comparative effect of rehearsal, strategic, and online planning on the fluency, accuracy, complexity, lexical variety, and attentional allocation of EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, (), –. 10.22099/tesl.2021.41004.3017
     https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2021.41004.3017 [Google Scholar]
  20. Donate, A.
    (2022) Task anxiety, cognition, and performance, Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/23247797.2022.2090661
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2022.2090661 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2019) Task motivation: What makes an L2 task engaging?InZ. Wen, & M. J. Ahmadian (Eds.), Researching L2 performance and pedagogy (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.13.04dor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.04dor [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, N. C.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. InRebuschat, P. (Ed.) Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.01ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.01ell [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Planning and task-based performance. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.03ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.03ell [Google Scholar]
  24. (2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp042
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2019) Introducing task-based language teaching. Wiley’s ELT Corner. 10.1017/9781108643689
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689 [Google Scholar]
  26. Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N.
    (2011) New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, (), –. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.019
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  27. Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J.
    (2015) The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, (), –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fukunaga, T.
    (2021) L2 writing development through two types of writing task repetition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (). 10.1515/iral‑2021‑0144
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0144 [Google Scholar]
  29. Golparvar, S. E., & Rashidi, F.
    (2021) The effect of task complexity on integrated writing performance: The case of multiple-text source-based writing. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102524
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102524 [Google Scholar]
  30. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z.
    (2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, (), –. 10.3758/BF03195564
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564 [Google Scholar]
  31. Güvendir, E., & Uzun, K.
    (2023) L2 writing anxiety, working memory, and task complexity in L2 written performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, , . 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101016 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hsu, H. C.
    (2017) The Effect of task planning on L2 performance and L2 development in text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amv032
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv032 [Google Scholar]
  33. Johnson, M. D.
    (2017) Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, lexical complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A.
    (2012) The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, (), –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kellogg, R. T.
    (1996) A model of working memory in writing. InC. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp.–). Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, Y., Kang, S., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, B.
    (2020) The role of task repetition in a Korean as a foreign language classroom: Writing quality, attention to form, and learning of Korean grammar. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/flan.12501
     https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12501 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2011) Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.09ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.09ch4 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2012) Syntactic complexity, lexical variation, and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. InA. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder, Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in SLA (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.07kui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.07kui [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, J.
    (2018) Task complexity, cognitive load, and L1 speech. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amx054
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx054 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2020) Task closure and task complexity effects on L2 written performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, (),. 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100777
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100777 [Google Scholar]
  41. Long, M.
    (2014) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lu, X.
    (2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu [Google Scholar]
  43. (2017) Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532217710675
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710675 [Google Scholar]
  44. Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Dura´n, P.
    (2004) Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511804
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511804 [Google Scholar]
  45. Manchón, R. M.
    (2014) The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. InByrnes, H., Manchón, R. M. (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp.–). John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. A.
    (2007) Vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532207080767
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207080767 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mehrang, F.
    (2016) The effect of task structure, task repetition, and reformulation on foreign language written performance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Auckland.
  48. Nitta, R., & Baba, K.
    (2014) Task repetition and L2 writing development: A longitudinal study from a dynamic systems perspective. InH. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights to and from writing (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.7.05nit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.05nit [Google Scholar]
  49. (2018) Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective: The case of a writing task. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Learning language through task repetition (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11.11nit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.11nit [Google Scholar]
  50. Rahimi, M.
    (2018) Effects of increasing the degree of reasoning and the number of elements on L2 argumentative writing. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168818761465
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818761465 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J.
    (2019) Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1336042
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1336042 [Google Scholar]
  52. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2011) Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. InP. Robinson (Ed.) Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R.
    (2007) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/iral.2007.007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.007 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sánchez, A. J., Manchón, R. M., & Gilabert, R.
    (2020) The effects of task repetition across modalities and proficiency levels. InR. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and Language Learning: Advancing Research Agendas (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.56.06san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.06san [Google Scholar]
  57. Skehan, P.
    (2001) Tasks and language performance assessment. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.–). Longman/Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5 [Google Scholar]
  59. Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Second language anxiety, and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263118000311
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000311 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N.
    (2009) Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. Language Testing, , –. 10.1177/0265532209104670
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yalaoui, F. Z. & Rabahi, Kh.
    (2017) The effect of rehearsal planning on the accuracy of narratives composed by secondary school students: The case of third year-foreign languages stream-at Nedjar Hocine secondary school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Tlemcen, Algeria.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Yasuda, S.
    (2011) Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, (),–. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zalbidea, J.
    (2017) ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12389
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12389 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23003.abd
Loading
Exploring the interplay between task-readiness factors and task complexity in L2 writing performance and anxiety
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.23003.abd
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23003.abd
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23003.abd
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: L2 writing performance ; anxiety ; TBLT ; task-readiness factors

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error