1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Interactive roles of L1 properties and L2 textbook input for constructing L2 knowledge
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates how morphosyntactic features of learners’ L1 (Czech; English) and characteristics of L2-textbook input jointly contribute to L2-Korean learners’ comprehension of Korean subject–predicate honorific agreement, focusing on the two mismatch conditions on the honorific status between a subject and a predicate. Textbook analysis revealed over-emphasis on the honorific suffix (and honorification in general) and unsystematic approaches to raising awareness of this knowledge. Acceptability judgement with reaction time measurement revealed learners’ global leniency in the grammatically incorrect condition and by-L1 asymmetries regarding acceptability ratings and processing cost for the infelicitous (but acceptable in actual language use) condition. Implications of this study’s findings are discussed with respect to the interplay between L1 properties and L2 textbook input in constructing noisy representations of L2 knowledge.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23007.jun
2025-10-30
2025-11-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.23007.jun
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alsaif, A., & Milton, J.
    (2012) Vocabulary input from school textbooks as a potential contributor to the small uptake gained by English as a foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia. Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2012.658221
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.658221 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambridge, B., Bidgood, A., Twomey, K. E., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Freudenthal, D.
    (2015) Preemption versus entrenchment: Towards a construction-general solution to the problem of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. PloS one, (), e0123723. 10.1371/journal.pone.0123723
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123723 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P.
    (2010) Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, (), –. 10.21500/20112084.807
     https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B.
    (1989) Functionalism and the competition model. InB. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp.–). New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bidgood, A., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F.
    (2014) The retreat from locative overgeneralisation errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgment study. PLOS one, (), e97634. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097634
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097634 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bresnan, J.
    (2007) Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. InS. Featherston and W. Sternefeld (eds), Roots: Linguistics in Search of Its Evidential Base (pp.–). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198621.75
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198621.75 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, L.
    (2010) Questions of appropriateness and authenticity in the representation of Korean honorifics in textbooks for second language learners. Language, Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908310903474246
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310903474246 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) Honorifics and politeness. InL. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp.–). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781118371008.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, X., & Brown, L.
    (2022) Second Language knowledge of pragmatic meanings: What do learners of Korean know about the Korean pronouns ce and na?Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.10.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, X., & Lee, J.
    (2021) The relationship between stereotypical meaning and contextual meaning of Korean honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cho, S. & Whitman, J.
    (2020) Korean: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Choo, M. & Kwak, H-Y.
    (2008) Using Korean: a guide to contemporary usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168496
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168496 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
    (2006) Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716406060206
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060206 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cunnings, I.
    (2017) Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916000675
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000675 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dąbrowska, E.
    (2009) Constructing a second language: Some final thoughts. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/arcl.7.11dab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.11dab [Google Scholar]
  18. (2010) Naive v. expert intuitions: An empirical study of acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review, (), –. 10.1515/tlir.2010.001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dąbrowska, E., Becker, L., & Miorelli, L.
    (2020) Is adult second language acquisition defective?, Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01839 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, M., & Face, T.
    (2006) Vocabulary coverage in Spanish textbooks: How representatives is it?. InN. Sagarra & A. J. Toribio (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.–). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Eckes, T., & Grotjahn, R.
    (2006) A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1191/0265532206lt330oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt330oa [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2006) Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review, (), –. 10.1075/aila.19.08ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.08ell [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. G.
    (2009) Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/arcl.7.08ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell [Google Scholar]
  25. Eom, J-s.
    (2019) A study on the use of the honorific suffix ‘-si-’ by learners of Korean. Hanmincokemwunhak, , –. 10.31821/HEM.84.1
     https://doi.org/10.31821/HEM.84.1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Frenck-Mestre, C., Kim, S. K., Choo, H., Ghio, A., Herschensohn, J., & Koh, S.
    (2019) Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1080/23273798.2018.1549332
     https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1549332 [Google Scholar]
  27. Futrell, R., & Gibson, E.
    (2017) L2 processing as noisy channel language comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916001061
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001061 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2019) Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Grodner, D., & Gibson, E.
    (2005) Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial complexity. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Grüter, T., & Hopp, H.
    (2021) How permeable are native and non-native syntactic processing to crosslinguistic influence?. Journal of Memory and Language, , . 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104281
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104281 [Google Scholar]
  31. Grüter, T., & Rohde, H.
    (2021) Limits on expectation-based processing: Use of grammatical aspect for co-reference in L2. Applied Psycholinguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0142716420000582
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000582 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hale, J.
    (2003) The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, , –. 10.1023/A:1022492123056
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022492123056 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S.
    (2017) The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728915000164
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000164 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Moors, A.
    (2017) On the automaticity of language processing. InH.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp.–). De Gruyter-Mouton. 10.1037/15969‑010
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-010 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hopp, H.
    (2014) Working memory effects in the L2 processing of ambiguous relative clauses. Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1080/10489223.2014.892943
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892943 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2018) The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language, , –. 10.11431/secondlanguage.17.0_5
     https://doi.org/10.11431/secondlanguage.17.0_5 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hwang, S. H., & Lardiere, D.
    (2013) Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658312461496
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461496 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jackson, C. N., & Dussias, P. E.
    (2009) Cross-linguistic differences and their impact on L2 sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728908003908
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003908 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jacob, G., & Felser, C.
    (2016) Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2014.984231
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.984231 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X.
    (2011) Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00627.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Jung, B. K., & Shin, G-H.
    (2024) L2 textbook input and L2 written production: a case of Korean locative postposition–verb construction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2022‑0028
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0028 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kaan, E.
    (2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa [Google Scholar]
  43. Kharkwal, G., & Stromswold, K.
    (2014) Good-enough language processing: Evidence from sentence-video matching. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑013‑9239‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9239-5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim, E. S.
    (2010) The Construction of Norms of Linguistic Politeness: Valorizations of Korean Honorification in Language How-To Manuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of British Columbia, Canada.
  45. Kim, H., & Shin, G-H.
    (2021) Effects of long-term language use experience in sentence processing: Evidence from Korean. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, , –. 10.1007/s10936‑020‑09737‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09737-0 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim, H., Shin, G-H., & Hwang, H.
    (2020) Integration of verbal and constructional information in the second language processing of English dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263119000743
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000743 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim-Renaud, Y.-K.
    (2001) Change in Korean honorifics reflecting social change. InT. E. McAuley (ed.), Language change in East Asia (pp.–). London: Curzon.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kwak, Y.
    (2017) Manners of translation of Czech and Korean honorifics. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Kwon, N., & Sturt, P.
    (2016) Attraction effects in honorific agreement in Korean. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01302
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01302 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2024) When social hierarchy matters grammatically: Investigation of the processing of honorifics in Korean. Cognition, , . 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105912
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105912 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kyle, K.
    (2016) Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgia State University.
  52. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S.
    (2017) Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532217712554
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217712554 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lee, C., Shin, G-H., & Jung, B. K.
    (2024) How ‘good-enough’ is second language comprehension? Morphological causative and suffixal passive constructions in Korean. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2022‑0152
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0152 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lee-Ellis, S.
    (2009) The development and validation of a Korean C-test using Rasch analysis. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532208101007
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208101007 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K.
    (2015) Second language sensitivity to agreement errors: Evidence from eye movements during comprehension and translation. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716414000290
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000290 [Google Scholar]
  56. MacWhinney, B.
    (2008) A unified model. InP. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp.–). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. (2013) The logic of the unified model. InS. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.–). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Madlener, K.
    (2015) Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition (Vol.). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 10.1515/9783110405538
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110405538 [Google Scholar]
  59. McDonald, J. L.
    (2006) Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  60. McKay, T.
    (2019) More on the validity and reliability of C-test scores: A meta-analysis of C-test studies. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.
  61. Mitsugi, S., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2016) The use of case marking for predictive processing in second language Japanese. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728914000881
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000881 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mueller, J., & Jiang, N.
    (2013) The acquisition of the Korean honorific affix (u)si by advanced L2 learners. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12005.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12005.x [Google Scholar]
  63. O’Grady, W.
    (2015) Processing determinism. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12091
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12091 [Google Scholar]
  64. Omaki, A., & Schulz, B.
    (2011) Filler-gap dependencies and island constraints in second-language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263111000313
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000313 [Google Scholar]
  65. Park, S. H., & Kim, H.
    (2022) Cross-linguistic influence in the second language processing of Korean morphological and syntactic causative constructions. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C.
    (2016) Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: a visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728915000838
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000838 [Google Scholar]
  67. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Robenalt, C., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2016) Nonnative speakers do not take competing alternative expressions into account the way native speakers do. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12149
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12149 [Google Scholar]
  69. Rothman, J.
    (2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, , –. 10.1177/0267658310386439
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439 [Google Scholar]
  70. Römer, U.
    (2004) Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. InG. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Steward (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.17.12rom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.12rom [Google Scholar]
  71. Schütze, C. T.
    (1996) The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J.
    (2014) Judgment data. InR. J. Podesva & D. Sharma (eds), Research methods in linguistics (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.004 [Google Scholar]
  73. Shin, G-H., & Jung, B. K.
    (2022) Input-output relation in L2 acquisition: Textbook and learner writing for adult English-speaking beginners of Korean. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/aral.20049.shi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20049.shi [Google Scholar]
  74. Shin, G-H., Jung, B. K., & Yang, M.
    (2025) Learning environment and learning outcome: Evidence from Korean subject–predicate honorific agreement. Languages, (), . 10.3390/languages10080180
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10080180 [Google Scholar]
  75. Shin, G-H., & Park, S.
    (2023) Isomorphism and language-specific devices in comprehension of Korean suffixal passive construction by Mandarin-speaking learners of Korean. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2020‑0036
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0036 [Google Scholar]
  76. Sprouse, J., & Almeida, D.
    (2013) The role of experimental syntax in an integrated cognitive science of language. InK. K. Grohmann and C. Boeckx (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics (pp–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511980435.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.013 [Google Scholar]
  77. Shapiro, L. P., Hestvik, A., Lesan, L., & Garcia, A. R.
    (2003) Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00026‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00026-3 [Google Scholar]
  78. Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728908003404
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  79. Slabakova, R.
    (2014) The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Song, J.
    (2019) Enhancing intercultural competence with 360-degree virtual reality videos. The Korean Language in America, (), –. 10.5325/korelangamer.23.1.0085
     https://doi.org/10.5325/korelangamer.23.1.0085 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sohn, H. M.
    (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Song, S., Choe, J. W., & Oh, E.
    (2019) An empirical study of honorific mismatches in Korean. Language Sciences, , –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101238
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101238 [Google Scholar]
  83. Tachihara, K., & Goldberg, A. E.
    (2020) Reduced competition effects and noisier representations in a second language. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12375
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12375 [Google Scholar]
  84. Tan, M., & Foltz, A.
    (2020) Task sensitivity in L2 English speakers’ syntactic processing: Evidence for good-enough processing in self-paced reading. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575847 [Google Scholar]
  85. Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N.
    (2011) Across languages, space and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263110000549
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000549 [Google Scholar]
  86. Tomasello, M.
    (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J., & Altmann, G. T.
    (2014) Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/S1366728913000321
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000321 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23007.jun
Loading
Interactive roles of L1 properties and L2 textbook input for constructing L2 knowledge
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.23007.jun
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23007.jun
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.23007.jun
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: L2 textbook ; Korean ; Noisy representations ; Subject−predicate honorific agreement ; L1 property

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error