1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The production of German vowels by Arabic-speaking L2 learners
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the production of German front rounded and tense–lax back vowels (/uː/, /ʊ/, /ʏ/, /yː/) by Arabic-speaking L2 learners, addressing the underexplored area of how L1 Arabic phonological systems — where vowel length is phonemic — influence the acquisition of German vowel contrasts in L2 speech production. These vowels were selected based on predictions from the Speech Learning Model (SLM), as they represent both similar (/uː/, /ʊ/) and new (/ʏ/, /yː/) categories relative to the Arabic vowel inventory. Nine Arabic-speaking learners of German participated in the study and were compared with nine L1 German speakers. The study specifically examines the acoustic characteristics of these four vowels, focusing on formant values (F1 and F2) and vowel duration. The target vowels were embedded in disyllabic and multisyllabic word contexts. Acoustic analysis revealed that Arabic-speaking learners maintained a vowel length contrast similar to that of L1 speakers, with no significant durational differences observed between groups except for the vowel /ʊ/. The durational patterns suggest a possible transfer of L1 phonological features into the L2 environment. Additionally, significant differences in F1 and F2 values were found across speaker groups and vowel categories, with Arabic-speaking learners exhibiting vowel fronting and formant transfer. The findings are discussed within the framework of the SLM, illustrating the assimilation of similar vowels (/uː/, /ʊ/) to corresponding Arabic vowels, while new vowels (/ʏ/, /yː/) appear to be established as distinct phonetic categories. The results also offer pedagogical implications for improving pronunciation accuracy and speech intelligibility among Arabic-speaking learners of German.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24004.ade
2025-10-30
2025-11-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.24004.ade
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abou Haidar, L.
    (1994) Norme linguistique et variabilité dialectale: Analyse formantique du système vocalique de la langue arabe. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Ani, S.
    (1970) Arabic phonology. Mouton. 10.1515/9783110878769
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110878769 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alharbi, M., Foltz, A., Kornder, L., & Mennen, I.
    (2022) L2 acquisition and L1 attrition of VOTs of voiceless plosives in highly proficient late bilinguals. Second Language Research, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alispahic, S., Mulak, K. E., & Escudero, P.
    (2017) Acoustic properties predict perception of unfamiliar Dutch vowels by adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00052
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00052 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andreeva, B., Barry, W., Pützer, M., & Tanchev, A.
    (2015) L2 stressed vowel production by Bulgarian learners of German. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Retrieved fromhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:42315694
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrientos, F.
    (2024) Out with the old, in with the new: Contrasts involving new features with acoustically salient cues are more likely to be acquired than those that redeploy L1 features. Frontiers in Language Science. 10.3389/flang.2024.1295265
     https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1295265 [Google Scholar]
  8. Belkaid, Y.
    (1984) Arabic vowels, modern literature, spectrographic analysis. Travaux de l’Institut Phonétique de Strasbourg, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Best, C.
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.–). York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Best, C., & Tyler, M.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InO.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second-language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  11. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Retrieved fromwww.praat.org/
  12. Bohn, O.
    (1995) Cross language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.–). York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cao, G.
    (2023, August2). Phonetic Dissimilarity and L2 Category Formation in L2 Accommodation. Language and Speech. Advance. online publication. 10.1177/00238309231182967
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309231182967 [Google Scholar]
  14. Carroll, P., Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F.
    (2015) A visual feedback tool for German vowel production. Proceedings of Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung (ESSV), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chao, S., Ochoa, D., & Daliri, A.
    (2019) Production variability and categorical perception of vowels are strongly linked. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, , –. 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00096
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00096 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, W., van de Weijer, J.
    (2022) The role of L1-L2 dissimilarity in L2 segment learning — Implications from the acquisition of English post-alveolar fricatives by Mandarin and Mandarin/Wu speakers. Front Psychol. , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017724
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017724 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dellwo, V., & Wagner, P.
    (2003) Relations between language rhythm and speech rate. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dong, W., van Hout, R., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H.
    (2024) L2 prosody assessment by combining acoustic and neural model features. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2024. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024‑34
     https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2024-34 [Google Scholar]
  19. Escudero, P.
    (2005) Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University.
  20. Escudero, P., & Boersma, P.
    (2002) The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: Multiple-category assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish. InB. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. H.-J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.–). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Flege, J.
    (1980) Phonetic approximation in second language acquisition. Language Learning, , –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1980.tb00154.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00154.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W.
    (1987) Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication, (), –. 10.1016/0167‑6393(87)90025‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90025-2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Flege, J.
    (1987b) The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30537‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.–). York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Flege, J., & Bohn, O.
    (2021) The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flege, J., Bohn, O., & Jang, S.
    (1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 [Google Scholar]
  27. Flege, J., & Hillenbrand, J.
    (1984) Limits on pronunciation accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , –. 10.1121/1.391257
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391257 [Google Scholar]
  28. Flege, J., & Liu, S.
    (2001) The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44486960. 10.1017/S0272263101004041
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004041 [Google Scholar]
  29. Flege, J., & MacKay, I.
    (2004) Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, , –. 10.1017/S0272263104261010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104261010 [Google Scholar]
  30. Flege, J., Schmidt, A., & Wharton, G.
    (1996) Age of learning affects rate-dependent processing of stops in a second language. Phonetica, –. PMID10.1159/000262195
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000262195 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ghazeli, S.
    (1977) Back consonants and backing coarticulation in Arabic. [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University Texas at Austin].
  32. Gao, Y., Ding, H., Birkholz, P., Jäckel, R., & Lin, Y.
    (2019) Perception of German tense and lax vowel contrast by Chinese learners. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Electronic Speech Signal Processing (ESSV). Retrieved fromhttps://www.essv.de/paper.php?id=57
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Georgiou, G.
    (2018) Discrimination of L2 Greek vowel contrasts: Evidence from learners with Arabic L1 background. Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2018.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2021) Interplay between perceived cross-linguistic similarity and L2 production: analyzing the L2 vowel patterns of bilinguals. Journal of Second Language Studies, –. 10.1075/jsls.19031.geo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.19031.geo [Google Scholar]
  35. Guion, S., & Pederson, E.
    (2007) Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. InO. S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.09gui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.09gui [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall, C.
    (2003) Modern German pronunciation: An introduction for speakers of English. Manchester University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hazan, V., & Markham, D.
    (2004) Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hopp, H., & Schmid, M.
    (2013) Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, –. 10.1017/S0142716411000737
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000737 [Google Scholar]
  39. Iverson, P., & Evans, G.
    (2007) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , –. 10.1121/1.2783198
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2783198 [Google Scholar]
  40. Iverson, P., Kuhl, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C.
    (2001) A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. InSpeech, hearing and language: Work in progress (Vol., pp.–). University College London Department of Phonetics and Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Jessen, M.
    (1999) Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/sfsl.44
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.44 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kabakoff, H., & Levi, G.
    (2020) Training a non-native vowel contrast with a distributional learning paradigm results in improved perception and production. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100940
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100940 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kerschhofer-Puhalo, N.
    (2014) Similarity, cross-linguistic influence and preferences in non-native vowel perception: An experimental cross-language comparison of German vowel identification by non-native listeners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wien University].
  44. Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Kong, E.
    (2020) Individual differences in perceptual adaptation to unfamiliar phonetic categories. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100984
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100984 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kingston, J.
    (2003) Learning foreign vowels. Language & Speech, , –. 10.1177/00238309030460020201
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020201 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ladefoged, P.
    (2006) A Course in phonetics (5th ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K.
    (2014) A course in phonetics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lipińska, D.
    (2015) Production of L3 vowels: Is it possible to separate them from L1 and L2 sounds?Research in Language, (), –. 10.1515/rela‑2015‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0011 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mayer, R., & Escudero, P.
    (2010) Explaining individual variation in L2 perception: Rounded vowels in English learners of German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/S1366728909990022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990022 [Google Scholar]
  50. McAllister, R., Flege, J., & Piske, T.
    (2002) The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics. , –. 10.1006/jpho.2002.0174
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0174 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mitleb, F.
    (1984) Vowel length contrast in Arabic and English: A spectrographic test. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30879‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30879-4 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mitterer, H., Eger, N., & Reinisch, E.
    (2020) My English sounds better than yours: Second-language learners perceive their own accent as better than that of their peers. PLoS ONE, , –. e0227643. 10.1371/journal.pone.0227643
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227643 [Google Scholar]
  53. Moon, S., & Lindblom, B.
    (1994) Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , –. 10.1121/1.410492
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410492 [Google Scholar]
  54. Munro, M.
    (1993) Production of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, , –. 10.1177/002383099303600103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600103 [Google Scholar]
  55. Newman, D., & Verhoeven, J.
    (2002) Frequency analysis of Arabic in connected speech. Papers in Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. O’Brien, M., & Fagan, S.
    (2016) German Phonetics and Phonology: Theory and Practice. Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Oh, E.
    (2019) The relationship between “native-like” L2 vowel production and perceptual judgments enhancement by native listeners. Linguistic Research, (), –. 10.17250/khisli.36.2.201906.004
     https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.36.2.201906.004 [Google Scholar]
  58. Perwitasari, A.
    (2018) Perception of English vowels by Javanese and Sundanese speakers: A mouse-tracking study. Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, (), Article 9. 10.17510/wacana.v19i1.607
     https://doi.org/10.17510/wacana.v19i1.607 [Google Scholar]
  59. Perwitasari, A., Klamer, M., & Schiller, N.
    (2016) Formant frequencies and vowel space area in Javanese and Sundanese English language learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, , –. 10.17576/3L‑2016‑2203‑10
     https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2203-10 [Google Scholar]
  60. Pickett, M.
    (1999) The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology. Allyn and Bacon.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J.
    (2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 [Google Scholar]
  62. Polka, L., & Bohn, O.
    (1996) A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , –. 10.1121/1.415884
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415884 [Google Scholar]
  63. Saadah, E.
    (2011) The production of Arabic vowels by English L2 learners and heritage speakers of Arabic [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].
  64. Stevens, K.
    (1999) Acoustic phonetics. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1072.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sonnenberg, C., & vom Brocke, J.
    (2012) Evaluations in the science of the artificial — Reconsidering the build-evaluate pattern in design science research. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2012), –. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑29863‑9_28
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_28 [Google Scholar]
  66. Strandberg, J., Gooskens, C., & Schüppert, A.
    (2021) Simultaneous bilingualism and speech style as predictors of variation in allophone production: evidence from Finland-Swedish. Journal of Phonetics, , –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101095
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101095 [Google Scholar]
  67. Strange, W.
    (2011) Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, (), –. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kubo, R., Trent, S., & Nishi, K.
    (2001) Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , –. 10.1121/1.1353594
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1353594 [Google Scholar]
  69. Strange, W., Bohn, O., Nishi, K., & Trent, S.
    (2005) Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, , –. 10.1121/1.1992688
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1992688 [Google Scholar]
  70. Stratton, J.
    (2023) Explicit pronunciation instruction in the second language classroom: An acoustic analysis of German final devoicing. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.22038.str
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.22038.str [Google Scholar]
  71. (2025, in press). The effects of production training on speech perception in L2 learners of German. Journal of Phonetics, . 10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101370
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101370 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wickham, H.
    (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wottawa, J., & Adda-Decker, M.
    (2018) Quand les voyelles longues et brèves ne tiennent pas en place : la qualité vocalique en allemand L2, –. 10.21437/JEP.2018‑8
     https://doi.org/10.21437/JEP.2018-8 [Google Scholar]
  74. Yang, Y., Chen, X., & Xiao, Q.
    (2022) Cross-linguistic similarity in L2 speech learning: evidence from the acquisition of Russian stop contrasts by Mandarin speakers. Second Language Research, , –. Res. , –. 10.1177/0267658319900919
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319900919 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24004.ade
Loading
The production of German vowels by Arabic-speaking L2 learners
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.24004.ade
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24004.ade
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24004.ade
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Arabic vowels ; Late Arabic learners of L2 German ; Speech Learning Model ; German vowels ; Transfer in Arabic

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error