1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of How much receptive affix knowledge do L1 speakers and L2 learners have?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Although there is a growing interest in assessing how much L2 receptive affix knowledge learners have, research testing this knowledge using an extensive, standardized measure is relatively scarce. This study tested 21 L1 and 107 L2 learners of English to assess receptive knowledge of forms, meanings, and grammatical functions of 118 derivational affixes. Participants’ responses on the Word Part Levels Test were analyzed in mixed effects logistic regression models that examined the effects of affix difficulty, affix knowledge aspect, and vocabulary levels in predicting response accuracy. Results indicated that L1 and L2 affix knowledge differed depending on affix difficulty and knowledge aspect, L2 affix knowledge increased as a function of L2 vocabulary levels, and there was a clear difference between learners that had not mastered the first 1,000 frequency level and the rest of the learners. This suggests that developing the knowledge of the highest frequency vocabulary is critical to improve affix knowledge. The importance of using standardized measures of vocabulary in teaching and researching vocabulary knowledge is also discussed.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24014.iwa
2025-05-06
2025-05-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.24014.iwa
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anglin, J. M.
    (1993) Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, (). 10.2307/1166112
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1166112 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer, L., & Nation, I. S. P.
    (1993) Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, (), –. 10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben-Shachar
    (2020) effectsize: Estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. Journal of Open Source Software, (), , 10.21105/joss.02815
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berk, R. A.
    (2004) Regression analysis: A constructive critique. Sage. 10.4135/9781483348834
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348834 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D.
    (2015) Is there a core general vocabulary? Introducing the new general service list. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt018 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, D., Stoeckel, T., McLean, S., & Stewart, J.
    (2022) The most appropriate lexical unit for L2 vocabulary research and pedagogy: A brief review of the evidence. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amaa061
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa061 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chiswick, B. & Miller, P. W.
    (2005) Linguistic distance: A quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/14790710508668395
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710508668395 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cobb, T., & Laufer, B.
    (2021) The nuclear word family list: A list of the most frequent family members, including base and affixed words. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12452
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12452 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coxhead, A.
    (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587951
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coxhead, A., Nation, P. & Sim, D.
    (2015) Measuring the vocabulary size of native speakers of English in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, (), –. 10.1007/s40841‑015‑0002‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0002-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Coxhead, A., Nation, I. S. P., Woods, L., & Sim, D.
    (2018) Group vs. individual: How administration procedure can affect vocabulary test scores. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, (), –. https://www.alanz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/article3.Coxhead.et_.al_.2018GS.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S.
    (2017) The academic spoken word list. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12253
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12253 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  15. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S.
    (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, (), –. 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
     https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartig, F.
    (2020) DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models (R package, Version 0.4.7) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hayashi, Y., & Murphy, V.
    (2011) An investigation of morphological awareness in Japanese learners of English. Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571731003663614
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571731003663614 [Google Scholar]
  19. Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S.
    (2022) Measuring L1 and L2 productive derivational knowledge: How many derivatives can L1 and L2 learners with differing vocabulary levels produce?TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.3035
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3035 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2023) To what extent do learner- and word-related variables affect production of derivatives?Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12524
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12524 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang, N.
    (2000) Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/21.1.47
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ke, S., Miller, R. T., Zhang, D., & Koda, K.
    (2021) Crosslinguistic sharing of morphological awareness in biliteracy development: A systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12429
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12429 [Google Scholar]
  23. Koda, K.
    (2000) Cross-linguistic variations in L2 morphological awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716400003015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400003015 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kremmel, B.
    (2021) Selling the (word) family silver? A response to Webb’s “Lemma dilemma.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000693
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000693 [Google Scholar]
  25. Laufer, B.
    (2024) Understanding L2-derived words in context: Is complete receptive morphological knowledge necessary?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263123000219
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000219 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2021) Lemmas, flemmas, word families, and common sense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000656
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000656 [Google Scholar]
  27. Laufer, B., & Cobb, T.
    (2020) How much knowledge of derived words is needed for reading?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amz051
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz051 [Google Scholar]
  28. Laufer, B., Webb, S., Kim, S. K., & Yohanan, B.
    (2021) How well do learners know derived words in a second language?ITL — International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/itl.20020.lau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20020.lau [Google Scholar]
  29. Lenth, R. V.
    (2022) Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aks least-squares means (R package, Version 1.10.7) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Leontjev, D., Huhta, A., & Tolvanen, A.
    (2023) L2 English vocabulary breadth and knowledge of derivational morphology: One or two constructs?Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/02655322221114015
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221114015 [Google Scholar]
  31. McCutchen, D., Green, L., & Abbott, R. D.
    (2008) Children’s morphological knowledge: Links to literacy. Reading Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/02702710801982050
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801982050 [Google Scholar]
  32. McLean, S.
    (2018) Evidence for the adoption of the flemma as an appropriate word counting unit. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amw050
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw050 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mizumoto, A., Sasao, Y., Webb, S.
    (2019) Developing and evaluating a computerized adaptive testing version of the Word Part Levels Test. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532217725776
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217725776 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K.
    (2000) An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, (), –. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(00)00013‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00013-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nagy, W., Diakidoy, I., & Anderson, R.
    (1993) The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior, (), –. 10.1080/10862969309547808
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969309547808 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nagy, W., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R.
    (1985) Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/747758
     https://doi.org/10.2307/747758 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nagy, W., & Scott, J.
    (1990) Word schemas: Expectations about the form and meaning of new words. Cognition and Instruction, (), –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3233473
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2004) A study of the most frequent word families in the British National Corpus. InP. Bogaards, & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.10.03nat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10.03nat [Google Scholar]
  39. (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?The Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2021) Thoughts on word families. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S027226312100067X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312100067X [Google Scholar]
  41. (2022) Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009093873
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2016) Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. Benjamins. 10.1075/z.208
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.208 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2022) Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009093873
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873 [Google Scholar]
  44. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.4.3) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.rproject.org
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Reynolds, B.
    (2015) The effects of word form variation and frequency on second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2015‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0021 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sasao, Y.
    (2013) Diagnostic tests of English vocabulary learning proficiency: Guessing from context and knowledge of word parts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
  47. Sasao, Y., & Webb, S.
    (2017) The word part levels test. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168815586083
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815586083 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmitt, N., Nation, P., & Kremmel, B.
    (2020) Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444819000326
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000326 [Google Scholar]
  49. Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728908003404
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shen, Y.
    (2022) Issues of measuring morphological awareness longitudinally. Reading Psychology. Advance online publication. 10.1080/02702711.2022.2141398
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2141398 [Google Scholar]
  51. Snoder, P., & Laufer, B.
    (2022) EFL learners’ receptive knowledge of derived words: The case of Swedish adolescents. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.3101
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3101 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sonbul, S., & El-Dakhs, D. A. S.
    (2024) L2 knowledge of English prefixes: The effect of vocabulary breadth and exposure. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/13621688211045040
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211045040 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W.
    (1989) The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(89)90002‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90002-8 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ward, J., & Chuenjundaeng, J.
    (2009) Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2009.01.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  55. Webb, S.
    (2021) The lemma dilemma: How should words be operationalized in research and pedagogy?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000784
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000784 [Google Scholar]
  56. Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H.
    (2009a) The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp010 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2009b) Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00509.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x [Google Scholar]
  58. Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O.
    (2017) The updated vocabulary levels test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL — International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/itl.168.1.02web
     https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web [Google Scholar]
  59. Green, S. B., & Yang, Y.
    (2009a) Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: An alternative to coefficient alpha. Psychometrika, (), –. 10.1007/s11336‑008‑9099‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9099-3 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2009b) Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale. Psychometrika, (), –. 10.1007/s11336‑008‑9098‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9098-4 [Google Scholar]
  61. Flora, D. B.
    (2020) Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1177/2515245920951747
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951747 [Google Scholar]
  62. Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y.
    (2022) semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package, Version 0.5–6) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
  63. McDonald, R. P.
    (1999) Test theory: a unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. McNeish, D.
    (2017) Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, (), –. 10.1037/met0000144
     https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mellenbergh, G. J.
    (1996) Measurement precision in test score and item response models. Psychological Methods, (), –. 10.1037/1082‑989X.1.3.293
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.3.293 [Google Scholar]
  66. Rosseel, Y.
    (2012) Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of statistical software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 [Google Scholar]
  67. Yang, Y., & Green, S. B.
    (2011) Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, (), –. 10.1177/0734282911406668
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406668 [Google Scholar]
  68. Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S.
    (2021) To what extent does productive derivational knowledge of adult L1 speakers and L2 learners at two educational levels differ?TESOL Journal, (), –. 10.1002/tesj.640
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.640 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lenth, R. V.
    (2022) Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aks least-squares means (R package, Version 1.8.2) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Schmitt, N., & Meara, P.
    (1997) Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263197001022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24014.iwa
Loading
How much receptive affix knowledge do L1 speakers and L2 learners have?
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.24014.iwa
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24014.iwa
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.24014.iwa
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge ; Receptive Word Part Knowledge ; Vocabulary Testing ; Updated Vocabulary Levels Test ; Word Part Levels Test

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error