1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Factors affecting foreign language learners’ receptive and productive word knowledge in English, French, German, and Spanish
PDF
EPUB

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of first language (L1) and second language (L2) frequency, cognateness, concreteness, and word length on language learners’ receptive and productive word knowledge in English, French, German, and Spanish. A group of Dutch-speaking non-language students ( = 529) completed a meaning recognition test and a form recall test in English, French, German or Spanish. Meaning recognition in English was influenced by L1 frequency and concreteness. In French and German, it was affected by L2 frequency and cognateness, and in Spanish by L2 frequency. Regarding form recall, L2 frequency was the only significant predictor across all four languages. Our findings suggest that factors affecting word knowledge may depend on the type of knowledge tested and/or the context in which a language is learned.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25004.boo
2026-01-08
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.25004.boo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/itl.25004.boo/itl.25004.boo.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25004.boo&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barclay, S., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A.
    (2021) Exploring the learning burden and decay of foreign language vocabulary knowledge: The effect of part of speech and word length. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), -. 10.1075/itl.20011.bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.20011.bar [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boone, G., & De Wilde, V.
    (2023) Productive vocabulary knowledge in L2 German: Which word-related variables matter?System, . 10.1016/j.system.2023.103150
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103150 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brysbaert, M.
    (2020) Basic statistics for psychologists (Second edition). Red Globe Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A.
    (2011) The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000123
     https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000123 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
    (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V.
    (2014) Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0403‑5
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Charbonnier, J., & Wartena, C.
    (2021) Predicting the concreteness of German words. InProceedings of the 5th Swiss text analytics conference (SwissText) & 16th conference on natural language processing (KONVENS). CEUR-WS (vol. 2624). 10.25968/OPUS‑2075
     https://doi.org/10.25968/OPUS-2075 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Crossley, S., Kyle, K., & Salsbury, T.
    (2016) A usage-based investigation of L2 lexical acquisition: The role of input and output. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12344
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12344 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2011) SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. de Groot, A. M. B., & Keijzer, R.
    (2000) What is hard to learn is easy to forget: The roles of word concreteness, cognate status, and word frequency in foreign-language vocabulary learning and forgetting. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00110
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00110 [Google Scholar]
  13. Denies, K., Magnus, I., Desmet, P., Gielen, S., Heyvaert, L., & Janssen, R.
    (2016) Motivation in a French L2 context: Teacher motivational practices and student attitudes in relation to proficiency. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dewaele, J.-M.
    (2005) Sociodemographic, Psychological and Politicocultural Correlates in Flemish Students’ Attitudes towards French and English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434630508668400
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630508668400 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J.
    (2020) Learning English through out-of-school exposure: How do word-related variables and proficiency influence receptive vocabulary learning?Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12380
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12380 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2022) Formal versus informal L2 learning: How do individual differences and word-related variables influence French and English L2 vocabulary learning in Dutch-speaking children?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000097
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000097 [Google Scholar]
  17. Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M.
    (2013) EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑013‑0326‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elgort, I., & Warren, P.
    (2014) L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12052
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12052 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, N. C.
    (2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263102002024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, N., & Beaton, A.
    (1993a) Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/14640749308401062
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401062 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A.
    (1993b) Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1993.tb00627.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1993.tb00627.x [Google Scholar]
  22. González-Fernández, B.
    (2022) Conceptualizing L2 vocabulary knowledge: An empirical examination of the dimensionality of word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263121000930
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000930 [Google Scholar]
  23. González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N.
    (2020) Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amy057
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gooskens, C., van Heuven, V. J., Golubović, J., Schüppert, A., Swarte, F., & Voigt, S.
    (2018) Mutual intelligibility between closely related languages in Europe. International Journal of Multilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/14790718.2017.1350185
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1350185 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goriot, C., van Hout, R., Broersma, M., Lobo, V., McQueen, J. M., & Unsworth, S.
    (2021) Using the peabody picture vocabulary test in L2 children and adolescents: Effects of L1. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2018.1494131
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1494131 [Google Scholar]
  26. Guasch, M., Ferré, P., & Fraga, I.
    (2016) Spanish norms for affective and lexico-semantic variables for 1,400 words. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑015‑0684‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0684-y [Google Scholar]
  27. Gyllstad, H., Vilkaitė, L., & Schmitt, N.
    (2015) Assessing vocabulary size through multiple-choice formats: Issues with guessing and sampling rates. ITL — International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/itl.166.2.04gyl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.2.04gyl [Google Scholar]
  28. Henriksen, B.
    (1999) Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263199002089
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002089 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keuleers, E.
    (2013) vwr: Useful functions for visual word recognition research. Retrieved fromhttps://cran.r-project.org/package=vwr
  30. Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
    (2010) SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643 [Google Scholar]
  31. Köper, M., & Schulte im Walde, S.
    (2016) Automatically generated norms of abstractness, arousal, imageability and valence for 350 000 German lemmas. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Portorož: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). https://www.ims.unistuttgart.de/en/research/resources/experiment-data/affective-norms/
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kormos, J., Suzuki, S., & Eguchi, M.
    (2022) The role of input modality and vocabulary knowledge in alignment in reading-to-speaking tasks. System, , . 10.1016/j.system.2022.102854
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102854 [Google Scholar]
  33. Laufer, B.
    (1997) What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting vocabulary acquisition. InN. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (1998) The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/19.2.255
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2012) Second language word difficulty. InC. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.–). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1328
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1328 [Google Scholar]
  36. Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z.
    (2004) Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness: Language Learning. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2004.00260.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Laufer, B., & Nation, P.
    (1999) A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553229901600103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., & Michel, M.
    (2004) Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960444000007
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lotto, L., & de Groot, A. M. B.
    (1998) Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00032
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00032 [Google Scholar]
  40. Muñoz, C., Cadierno, T., & Casas, I.
    (2018) Different starting points for English language learning: A comparative study of Danish and Spanish young Learners. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12309
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12309 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H.
    (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, (), –. 10.1111/j.2041‑210x.2012.00261.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Nation, I. S. P.
    (1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. Newbury House Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (2001) Learning vocabulary in another language (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524759
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 [Google Scholar]
  44. New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C.
    (2007) The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S014271640707035X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640707035X [Google Scholar]
  45. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L.
    (2004) Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, (), –. 10.3758/BF03195598
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195598 [Google Scholar]
  46. Otwinowska, A., Foryś-Nogala, M., Kobosko, W., & Szewczyk, J.
    (2020) Learning orthographic cognates and non-cognates in the classroom: Does awareness of cross-linguistic similarity matter?Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12390
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12390 [Google Scholar]
  47. Paquot, M.
    (2017) L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658315620265
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315620265 [Google Scholar]
  48. Paivio, A.
    (1969) Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/h0027272
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027272 [Google Scholar]
  49. Peters, E.
    (2020) Factors affecting the learning of single-word items. InS. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (1st ed., pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429291586‑9
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586-9 [Google Scholar]
  50. Peters, E., Noreillie, A., Heylen, K., Bulté, B., & Desmet, P.
    (2019) The impact of instruction and out-of-school exposure to foreign language input on learners’ vocabulary knowledge in two languages. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12351
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12351 [Google Scholar]
  51. Peters, E., & Webb, S.
    (2018) Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263117000407
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000407 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pinchbeck, G. G., Brown, D., Mclean, S., & Kramer, B.
    (2022) Validating word lists that represent learner knowledge in EFL contexts: The impact of the definition of word and the choice of source corpora. System, , . 10.1016/j.system.2022.102771
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102771 [Google Scholar]
  53. Puimège, E., & Peters, E.
    (2019a) Learners’ English vocabulary knowledge prior to formal instruction: The role of learner-related and word-related variables. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12364
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12364 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2019b) Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: An exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1638630
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1638630 [Google Scholar]
  55. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Reynolds, B. L., Wu, W.-H., Liu, H.-W., Kuo, S.-Y., & Yeh, C.-H.
    (2015) Towards a model of advanced learners’ vocabulary acquisition: An investigation of L2 vocabulary acquisition and retention by Taiwanese English majors. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2015‑0006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0006 [Google Scholar]
  57. Rogers, J., Webb, S., & Nakata, T.
    (2015) Do the cognacy characteristics of loanwords make them more easily learned than noncognates?Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168814541752
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541752 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schepens, J., Dijkstra, T., & Grootjen, F.
    (2012) Distributions of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728910000623
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000623 [Google Scholar]
  59. Schmitt, N.
    (2010) Researching vocabulary. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9780230293977
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2014) Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12077
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2019) Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444819000053
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000053 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schmitt, N., Dunn, K., O’Sullivan, B., Anthony, L., & Kremmel, B. Introducing Knowledge-based Vocabulary Lists (KVL)
    (2021) TESOL Journal, (), . 10.1002/tesj.622
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.622 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sonbul, S., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., & Masrai, A.
    (2023) Second language productive knowledge of collocations: Does knowledge of individual words matter?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263122000341
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000341 [Google Scholar]
  64. Thompson, B., & Lupyan, G.
    (2018) Automatic estimation of lexical concreteness in 77 languages. InThe 40th annual conference of the cognitive science society (cogsci 2018) (pp.–). Cognitive Science Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Tschirner, Erwin
    (2021): Examining the validity and reliability of the ITT vocabulary size tests. Leipzig (Research papers in assessment 3).
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Vanbuel, M.
    (2025) Predicting vocabulary knowledge in adult L2 learners: The role of word-level variables across educational backgrounds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728924000889
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728924000889 [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Der Slik, F. W. P.
    (2010) Acquisition of Dutch as a second language: The explanative power of cognate and genetic linguistic distance measures for 11 West European first languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263110000021
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000021 [Google Scholar]
  68. van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2014) Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521 [Google Scholar]
  69. Vanhove, J., & Berthele, R.
    (2015) The lifespan development of cognate guessing skills in an unknown related language. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2015‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0001 [Google Scholar]
  70. Vidal, K.
    (2011) A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00593.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x [Google Scholar]
  71. Webb, S.
    (2005) Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263105050023
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050023 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2008) Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263108080042
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080042 [Google Scholar]
  73. Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P.
    (2017) How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Xu, J., & Van De Poel, K.
    (2011) English as a Lingua Franca in Flanders: A study of university students’ attitudes. English Text Construction, (), –. 10.1075/etc.4.2.05xu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.4.2.05xu [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25004.boo
Loading
Factors affecting foreign language learners’ receptive and productive word knowledge in English, French, German, and Spanish
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.25004.boo
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25004.boo
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25004.boo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: cognateness ; vocabulary ; frequency ; meaning recognition ; form recall

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error