1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Interactions among motivational orientations, cognitive task complexity, and proficiency in L2 writing performance
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examined how L2 learners’ motivational orientations predict writing performance across task complexity and proficiency levels. Drawing on Regulatory Focus Theory and Regulatory Mode Theory, four motivational orientations (promotion, prevention, assessment, and locomotion) were examined as predictors of syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF). One hundred and twenty EFL learners at B1–C1 levels completed simple and complex argumentative writing tasks and two motivational-orientation questionnaires. Multiple regression analyses showed that assessment consistently positively predicted several CALF measures, particularly under complex task conditions and at higher proficiency levels. Promotion positively predicted syntactic complexity and fluency but negatively predicted accuracy, especially among advanced learners completing the complex task. Prevention negatively predicted syntactic complexity and lexical sophistication, whereas locomotion positively predicted syntactic complexity but negatively predicted accuracy. Overall, the findings highlight the interplay of motivational orientations, cognitive task demands, and L2 proficiency and underscore the value of integrating motivational and cognitive considerations into task-based L2 writing instruction.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25020.abd
2026-08-25
2026-09-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.25020.abd
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdi Tabari, M., & Farahanynia, M.
    (2025) The predictive role of motivational orientations in L2 writing task performance across proficiency levels, Journal of Second Language Studies, (), –. 10.1075/jsls.00059.tab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00059.tab [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdi Tabari, M., Farahanynia, M., & Botes, E.
    (2025) Examining the predictive power of L2 writing anxiety on L2 writing performance in simple and complex tasks under task-readiness conditions. Assessing Writing, , . 10.1016/j.asw.2024.100912
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100912 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdi Tabari, M., & Golparvar, S. E.
    (2024) The interplay of task repetition and task rehearsal in L2 written production across varied proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research, OnlineFirst. 10.1177/13621688241266940
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241266940 [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdi Tabari, M., & Johnson, M. D.
    (2025) Rethinking fluency in task-based L2 writing: A critical examination of product- and process-based measures. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, (), . 10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100225 [Google Scholar]
  5. Abdi Tabari, M., Lu, X., & Wang, Y.
    (2023) The effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in L2 writing: An exploratory study. System, , . 10.1016/j.system.2023.103021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103021 [Google Scholar]
  6. Abdi Tabari, M., & Miller, M.
    (2021) Unraveling the effects of task sequencing on the syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency of L2 written production. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.37213/cjal.2021.31306
     https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.31306 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ardasheva, Y., Tong, S. S., & Tretter, T. R.
    (2012) Validating the English Language Learner Motivation Scale (ELLMS): Pre-college to measure language learning motivational orientations among young ELLs. Learning and Individual Differences, (), –. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bui, G.
    (2021) Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency, and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2018‑0244
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0244 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chau, T. C.
    (2023) The relationships between L1, writing quality, and complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 writing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of South Florida.
  10. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T.
    (1997) Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (), –. 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
     https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dao, P.
    (2021) Effects of task goal orientation on learner engagement in task performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral‑2018‑0188
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0188 [Google Scholar]
  12. DeKeyser, R., & Criado, R.
    (2012) Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. InChapelle, C. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.–). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0067
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0067 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2019) Task motivation: What makes an L2 task engaging?InZ. Wen & M. Ahmadian (Eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.13.04dor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.04dor [Google Scholar]
  14. Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z.
    (2008) Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00207.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Higgins, E. T.
    (1997) Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, , –. 10.1037/0003‑066X.52.12.1280
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2012) Regulatory focus theory. InP. A. M. Van Lange, E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp.–). Sage Publications Ltd. 10.4135/9781446249215.n24
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n24 [Google Scholar]
  17. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
    (2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ishikawa, T.
    (2007) The effect of increasing task complexity along the [±Here-and-Now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. InM. P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.–). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang, C., & Papi, M.
    (2021) The motivation-anxiety interface in language learning: A regulatory focus perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12375
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12375 [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, M. D.
    (2017) Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, M. D., & Abdi Tabari, M.
    (Eds.) (2025) Cognitive task complexity and second language performance: Understanding L2 learner affect and engagement. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003500216
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003500216 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, C., & Pekrun, R.
    (2014) Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. InJ. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp.–). Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑3185‑5_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kruglanski, A. W., Orehek, E., Higgins, E. T., Pierro, A., & Shalev, I.
    (2010) Modes of self-regulation: Assessment and locomotion as independent determinants in goal pursuit. InR. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp.–). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9781444318111.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318111.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P., Higgins, E. T., Atash, M. N., Pierro, A., Shah, J. Y., & Spiegel, S.
    (2000) To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, , –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.793
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.793 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I.
    (2005) Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. EUROSLA Yearbook, , –. 10.1075/eurosla.5.10kui
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.5.10kui [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2008) Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, (), –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2020) Complex dynamic systems theory. InB. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986‑11
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-11 [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, S., Wang, Z., & Ge, X.
    (2024) Effects of task complexity and L2 proficiency on functional adequacy in L2 writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12636
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12636 [Google Scholar]
  29. Maamuujav, U., Olson, C. B., & Chung, H.
    (2021) Syntactic and lexical features of adolescent L2 students’ academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, , . 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100822
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100822 [Google Scholar]
  30. Manchón, R. M., McBride, S., Mellado Martínez, M. D., & Vasylets, O.
    (2023) Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263123000141
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000141 [Google Scholar]
  31. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp044
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nowell, C.
    (2017) The influence of motivational orientation on the satisfaction of university students. Teaching in Higher Education, (), –. 10.1080/13562517.2017.1319811
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319811 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ortega, L.
    (2015) Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  34. Papi, M.
    (2018) Motivation as quality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S027226311700033X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700033X [Google Scholar]
  35. Papi, M., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Kim, C. J., Mahbodi, M., Eom, M., & Jiang, C.
    (2025) Regulatory focus and fit effects on task engagement: An experimental study. Applied Linguistics, Advance online publication. 10.1093/applin/amaf035
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf035 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pisarik, C. T.
    (2009) Motivational orientation and burnout among undergraduate college students. College Student Journal, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Polio, C., & Yoon, H. J.
    (2023) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CALF) measures. InM. Kessler & C. Polio (Eds.), Conducting genre-based research in Applied Linguistics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003300847‑10
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003300847-10 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pownall, J.
    (2016) Task complexity as mediated by proficiency, working memory, and attention: Competition for cognitive resources during L2 oral task performance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of Barcelona.
  39. Révész, A., Kourtali, N. E., & Mazgutova, D.
    (2017) Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12205
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12205 [Google Scholar]
  40. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2003) The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. (2011) Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1 [Google Scholar]
  43. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R.
    (2007) Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/iral.2007.007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Skehan, P.
    (2014) The context for researching a processing perspective on task performance. InP. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5.01ske
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.01ske [Google Scholar]
  45. Skinner, E. A., Graham, J. P., Brule, H., Rickert, N., & Kindermann, T. A.
    (2020) “I get knocked down, but I get up again”: Integrative frameworks for studying the development of motivational resilience in school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, (), –. 10.1177/0165025420924122
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420924122 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, W., & Wu, Y.
    (2025) EFL learner motivation and psychological well-being in online instruction: To spy the traces of resilience, autonomy, and engagement via path analysis. Learning and Motivation, , . 10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102078
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102078 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zabihi, R.
    (2017) The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0741088317735836
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25020.abd
Loading
Interactions among motivational orientations, cognitive task complexity, and proficiency in L2 writing performance
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.25020.abd
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25020.abd
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.25020.abd
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: L2 writing ; TBLT ; Cognitive task complexity ; CALF ; motivation ; proficiency

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error