1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

On The Relative Importance of Feedback Loops in Speech, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/itl.6.03leb-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.6.03leb
2016-12-23
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chase R. , Harvey S. , Standfast S. , Rapin I. , Sutton S.
    (1959) Comparison of the Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Speech and Key Tapping. Science129: 903–904.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dunker E. , Schlosshauer B.
    (1964) Irregularities in the Laryngeal Vibratory Pattern in Healthy and Hoarse Persons. Research in Voice Physiology, edited by D. Brewer (New York, State University of New York) 151–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fairbanks G.
    (1955) Selective Vocal Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders20: 333–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fairbanks G. , Guttman N.
    (1958) Effects of Delayed Auditory Feedback Upon Articulation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research1: 12–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fry D.
    (1954) The Experimental Study of Speech. Nature173: 844–846.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1957) Speech and Language. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology71:434–452.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaiser L.
    (1936) Das Hören der eigenen Sprache. Archives néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale12: 78–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kalmus H. , Denes P. , Fry D.
    (1955) Effect of Delayed Acoustic Feedback on Some Non-Vocalic Activities. Nature175: p.1078.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kloster Jensen M.
    (1960) Rôle du contrôle auditif dans la production des accents dits de mot des langues Scandinaves. Word16: 28–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ladefoged P.
    (1967) Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics (London, Oxford University Press).
  11. Lane H. , Catania A. , Stevens S.
    (1961) Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness, and Effects of Sidetone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America33: 160–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee B.
    (1950) Some Effects of Side-Tone Delay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22: 639–640.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1950) Effects of Delayed Speech Feedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22: 824–826.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1951) Artificial Stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders16: 53–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. MacNeilage P. , Rootes T. , Chase R.
    (1967) Speech Production and Perception in a Patient with Severe Impairment of Somesthetic Perception and Motor Control. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research10: 449–467.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. McCroskey R.
    (1958) The Relative Contribution of Auditory and Tactile Clues to Certain Aspects of Speech. Southern Speech Journal24: 84–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meyer-Eppler W.
    (1956) Verzögerte Rückkopplung als Mittel der Stimmforschung. Elektronische Rundschau10: 91–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meyer-Eppler W. , Luchsinger R.
    (1955) Beobachtungen bei der verzögerten Rückkopplung der Sprache. Folia Phoniatrica7: 87–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schliesser H. , Coleman R.
    (1968) Effectiveness of Certain Procedures for Alteration of Auditory and Oral Tactile Sensation for Speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26: 275–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith W. , McCrary J. , Smith K.
    (1960) Delayed Visual Feedback and Behavior. Science132:1013.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.6.03leb
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error