1887
Volume 71, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.71.01beh
1986-01-01
2024-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BENSOUSSAN, M.
    (1983): Dictionaries and tests of reading comprehension. ELT Journal87, 4, 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BENSOUSSAN, M. , D. SIM & R. WEISS
    (1981): The Effect of Dictionary Usage on EFL Test Performance. Compared with Student and Teacher Attitudes and Expectations. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds): Aila 81 Proceedings, 216–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BENSOUSSAN, M. & R. RAMRAZ
    (1983): The Fill-in Test: Combining Multiple-Choice and Modified Cloze Techniques to Test English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. Paper read atthe 7th International Language testing Symposium. University of Essex, Colchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BIALYSTOK, E. & J. HOWARD
    (1979): Inferencing as an aspect of cloze test performance. Working Papers on Bilingualism17:24–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BORMUTH, J.
    (1969): Factor validity of cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly4, 358–365.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CARROLL, J.B.
    (1961): Fundamental considerations in testing for English language proficiency of foreign students. H.B. Allen & R.N. Campbell (eds) (1972): Teaching English as a second language: a book of readings. New York: McGraw-Hill: 313–321.
  7. CHASE, C.I.
    (1972): Test of English as a second language. A review in O.V. Buros (ed.): Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park N.J.
  8. HARRIS, D.
    (1969): Testing English as a second language. New York. Mc. Graw-Hill.
  9. Het Certificaat Nederlands als vreemde taal
    Het Certificaat Nederlands als vreemde taal (1983): Brochure uigegeven door het Commissariaat- generaal voor de International Culturele Samenwerking van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en het Minsiterie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen van Nederland. Brussel – 's Gravenhage.
  10. HINOFOTIS, F.B.
    (1976): An investigation of the concurrent validity of cloze testing as a measure of overall proficiency in English as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. South Illinois University.
  11. HISAMA, K.K.
    (1980): An analysis of various ESL proficiency tests. J.W. Oller & K. Perkins (eds): Research in Language testing. Rowley, Mass., 47–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HUGHES, A.J. & A.J. WOODS
    (1981): Unitary Competence and Cambridge Proficiency. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds): AILA 81. Proceedings, 193.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. INGRAM, E.
    (1968): Item Analysis. A. Davies (ed.): Language Testing Symposium. London, O.U.P., 192–203.
  14. LEE, Y.P.
    (1979): Is there a global factor of language proficiency?Unpublished Ph.D. University of Hong Kong.
  15. LEE, Y.P. & G.D. LOW
    (1981): Classifying tests of language use. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds): AILA 81 Proceedings, 213–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LOOIJMANS, P. & H. PALM
    (1979): Tekstbegrip getoetst?Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. OLLER, J.W.
    (1976): Evidence for a general language proficiency factor: An expectancy grammar. Die Neueren Sprachen2, 165–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1976): Language tests at school. London, Longman.
  19. OLLER, J.W. & F.B. HINOFITIS
    (1976): Two mutually exclusive hypotheses about second language ability: indivisible or partially divisible competence. J.W. Oller & K. Perkins (eds): Research in Language Testing. Rowley, Mass., 13–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. POWERS, D.E.
    (1982): Selecting samples for testing the hypothesis of divisible versus unitary competence in language proficiency. Language Learning, 32, 3, 331–335.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. RAATZ, U.
    (1982): Language theory and factor analysis. M. Lut jeharms & T. Culhane (eds): Practice and problems in language testing3, Brussel, 30–56.
  22. ROHRER, J.
    (1981): Problems and practice in language testing: A view from the Bundessprachenamt. C. Klein-Braley & D.K. Stevenson (eds): Practice and problems in language testing1, 31–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SCHOLZ, G. HENDRICKS, D. , JOHNSON, M. & VANDENBURG, L.
    (1980): Is language ability divisible or unitary? A factor analysis of 22 English language proficiency tests. J.W. Oiler & K. Perkins (ed.): Research in Language testing. Rowley, Mass., 24–33.
  24. SHOHAMY, E.
    (1982): Predicting Speaking Proficiency from Cloze Tests: theoretical and practical considerations for test substitution. Applied LinguisticsVol. 3, nr.2, 161–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SPOLSKY
    (1973): What does it mean to know a language; or how do you get someone to perform his competence? F.W. Oller & J.C. Richards (eds): Focus on the learner: pragmatic perspectives for the language teacher. Rowley, Mass; 164–176.
  26. SWINTON, S.S. & D.E. POWERS
    (1980): Factor Analysis of the Test of English as a Foreign Language for Several Language Groups. TOEFL Research Report Nr.6. Princeton, N.J.
  27. VOLLMER, H.J.
    (1981): Receptive vs. productive competence? Models, findings and psycho-linguistic considerations in L2-testing. B. Sigurd & J. Svartvik (eds.): Aila 81 Proceed-ings, 208–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WESDORP, H.
    (1979): Over het toetsen van het schrijfvermogen in het moedertaalonderwijs. J.F. Matter (ed.): Taaltoetsen in onderwijs en onderzoek. ABLA-papers, nr.1, 28–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. : (1981): Evaluatietechnieken voor het moedertaalonderwijs. Staatsuitgeverij. Den Haag.
  30. WESTHOFF, G.J.
    (1981): Voorspellend lezen. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.
  31. WIJGH, I.F.
    (1982): Reading comprehension and authentic texts. M. Lut jeharms & T. Culhane (eds): Practice and Problems in Language testing3, Brussel, 82–87.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.71.01beh
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error