Phonetic Training for Migrant Worker Pupils

References

1. Beebe, L.
   (1984) : Myths about interlanguage phonologyin S. Eliasson (ed.); Theoretical Issues Contrastive Phonology. Heidelberg : J. Gross.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cutting, J. and D. Pisoni
   (1978) : An information-processing approach to speech perceptionin J. Kavanaugh and W. Strange (ed.), Speech and Language in the Laboratory, School and Clinic. Cambridge : MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Larkey, L.
   (1980) : The Role of Prosodie Information in Speech Perception. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lehiste, I.
   (1983) : The role of prosody in the internal structuring of a sentence. in S. Hattori and K. Inoue (eds), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. Tokyo.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lewis, P.
   (1961) : Implications of visual problems in learning disability. XIVth Annual Forum on Visual Problems of Children. Montgomery County, MD : Department of Education.
6. Mettas, O.
   (1963) : Etude sur les facteurs ectosémantiques de l'intonation en français, Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature de l'Université de Strasbourg, 1, 143–149.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Repp, B.
   (1983) : Phonetic and auditory trading relations between acoustic cues in speech perception : further results, Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-73, 121–139.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Wenk, B.
   (1983) : Articulatory setting and second language phonology. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 65, 51-65.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Wenk, B.
   (in press) : le Français parlé : vers un protocole pédagogique.. Bollettino de11 'IRRSAE per la Valle d'Aosta.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Wenk, B. and F. Wioland
    (1982) : Is French really syllable-timed?Journal of Phonetics, 10, 193–216.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Wioland, F. and B. Wenk
    (1983) : Prenez le temps, Le Français dans le Monde, 176, 79–83.
    [Google Scholar]