1887
Volume 79, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Critique de LAFONTAINE, Dominique & Pierre Mardaga (1986) Le parti-pris des mots - Normes et attitudes linguistiques, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/itl.79-80.07dep-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.79-80.07dep
1988-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. W. Labov
    , Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation, inLanguage in use, J. Baugh and J. Sherzer 1984, New Jersey : Prentice Hall, p.28–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description?, Variation omnibus, D. Sankoff and H. Cedergren 1981, Edmonton (Can.), p. 177–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dans la dernière édition du Bon Usage, refondue par A. Goosse , Duculot 1986, 1768 p., il est remarqué (p. 1322) : “ aimer de, tour classique, subsiste dans la langue littéraire (et aussi dans l’usage courant de certaines régions)”. Cette tournure est vraisemblablement fréquente dans le français parlé à Liège.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.79-80.07dep
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error