The Role of Cognitive and Hemispheric Processing Styles in L2 Learning

References

1. ABRAHAM, R.G.
   (1983): Relationship between the Use of the Strategy of Monitoring and the Cognitive Style. Studies in Second Language Acquisition6.17–32.
   [Google Scholar]
2. ALPTEKIN, C.
   (forthcoming): Neurolinguistic Dimensions of Foreign Language Tests. InProceedings of the Seminar. Testing English at University Level (3-5 November 1987). Istanbul : Bogazici University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BEAUMONT, J.G.
   (1983): Methods for Studying Cerebral Hemispheric Function. In A. W. Young (ed.), Functions of the Righ t Cerebral Hemisphere. London: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BEER, J.
   (1988): Hemispheric Dominance Inferred from Your Style of Learning and Thinking on Reports of Necker Cube Reversals and Maze Learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills66.887–890.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BROWN, H.D.
   (1987): Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BRYDEN, M.P.
   (1966): Left-Right Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition: Directional Scanning or Cerebral Dominance. Perceptual and Motor Skills29.1127–1134.
   [Google Scholar]
7. CANTO NI-HARVEY, G.
   (1987): Content-Area Language Instruction: Approaches and Strategies. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
   [Google Scholar]
8. CHAPELLE, C. and ROBERTS, C.
   (1986): Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Indepen-dence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning36.27–45.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CORBALLIS, M.C. and BEALE I.L.
   (1983): The Ambivalent Mind: The Neuropsychology of Left and Right. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
10. DAWSON, G.D.
    (1981): Sex Differences in Dichhaptic Processing. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 53.935–944.
    [Google Scholar]
11. DAY, J.
    (1977): Right Hemisphere Language Processing in Normal Right Handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3.518–528.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DULAY, H. , Burt, M. , and Krashen, S.
    (1982): Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. EHRLICHMAN, H. and Weinberger A.
    (1978): Lateral Eye Movements and Hemispheric Asymmetry: A Critical Review. Psychological Bulletin85.1080–1101.
    [Google Scholar]
14. GALLOWAY, L.M.
    (1983): Études cliniques et expérimentales sur la répartition hé-misphérique du traitement cérébral du langage chez les bilingues: modèles théoriques. Langages w2.79–113.
    [Google Scholar]
15. GUR, R.E.
    (1975): Conjugate Lateral Eye Movement as an Index of Hemispheric Activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31.751–757.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GUR, R.E. , Gur, R.C. , and Harris, L.J.
    (1975): Cerebral Activation, as Measured by Subjects' Lateral Eye Movements, is Influenced by Experimenter Location. Neuropsychologia13.35–44.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HANSEN, J. and STANSFIELD, C.
    (1981): The Relationship of Field Dependent-In-dependent Cognitive Styles to Foreign Language Achievement. Language Learning31.349–367.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HANSEN-STRAIN, L.
    (1984): Field-Dependence-Independence and Language Testing: Evidence from Six Pacific Island Cultures. TESOL Quarterly18.311–324. Second Language Test Performance. TESOL Quarterly21.565–569.
    [Google Scholar]
19. HARTNETT, D.D.
    (1975): The Relation of Cognitive Style and Hemispheric Preference to Deductive and Inductive Second Language Learning. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Los Angeles: UCLA.
20. HARTNETT, D.D.
    (1980): The Relationship of Analytic and Holistic Cognitive Styles to Second Language Instructional Methods. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. Los Angeles: UCLA.
21. HECAEN, H. and SAUGUET, J.
    (1971): Cerebral-dominance in Left-handed Subjects. Cortex719–48.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KIMURA, D.
    (1969): Cerebral Dominance and the Perception of Verbal Stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology15.166–171.
    [Google Scholar]
23. KIMURA, D.
    (1973): The Asymmetry of the Brain. Scientific American228.70–76.
    [Google Scholar]
24. KOTIK, B.
    (1975): Investigation of Speech Lateralization in Multilinguals. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State University.
25. KRASHEN, S.D.
    (1986): The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
26. KRASHEN, S.D. , Seliger, H. , and Hartnett, D.
    (1974): Two Studies in Adult Second Language Learning. Kritikon Literarum3.220–228.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LEVY, J.
    (1985): Right Brain, Left Brain: Fact or Fiction. Psychology Today19.38–44.
    [Google Scholar]
28. MCGLONE, J. and DAVIDSON, W.
    (1973): The Relation between Cerebral Speech Laterality and Spatial Ability with Special Reference to Sex and Hand Preference. Neuropsychologia11.105–113.
    [Google Scholar]
29. NAIMAN, N. , FRÖHLICH, M. , STERN, H.H. , and TODESCO, A.
    (1978): The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
    [Google Scholar]
30. OLTMAN, P.K. , RASKIN, E. , and WTTKIN, H.A.
    (1971): Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CAL: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. OLTMAN, P.K. , CHARMION, S. , and GOLDSTEIN, L.
    (1979): Cognitive Style and Interhemispheric Differentiation in the EEG. Neuropsychologia17.699–702.
    [Google Scholar]
32. PIZZAMIGLIO, L. and ZOCCOLOTTI, P.
    (1977): Laterality and Field Dependence. Paper presented atthe Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society.
    [Google Scholar]
33. PIZZAMIGLIO, L. and ZOCCOLOTTI, P.
    (1981): Sex and Cognitive Influence on Visual Hemifield Superiority for Face and Letter Recognition. Cortex17.215–226.
    [Google Scholar]
34. ROBERTS, C.A.
    (1983): Field Independence as a Predictor of Second Language Learning for Adult ESL Learners in the U.S. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
35. ROBINSON, G.L.N.
    (1985): Crosscultural Understanding. New York: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. SACKHEIM, H.A. , Weiman, A.L. , and Grega, D.M.
    (1984): Effects of Predictors of Hemispheric Specialization on Individual Differences in Hemispheric Activation. Neuropsychologia22.55–64.
    [Google Scholar]
37. SCHNEIDERMAN, E.I. and Wesche, M.B.
    (1986): Right-Hemisphere Processing and Foreign Language Aptitude. ITL71.43–64.
    [Google Scholar]
38. SHOHAMY, E.
    (1984): Does the Testing Method Make a Difference? The Case of Reading Comprehension. Language Testing1/2.147–170.
    [Google Scholar]
39. SILVERMAN, A.J. , Adevai, G. , and McGough, W.E.
    (1966): Some Relationships between Handedness and Perception. Journal of Psychosomatic Research10.151–158.
    [Google Scholar]
40. STANSFIELD, C. and HANSEN, J.
    (1983): Field Dependence-Independence as a Var-iable in Second Language Cloze Test Performance. TESOL Quarterly17.29–38.
    [Google Scholar]
41. STIEBLICH, C.H.
    (1984): Language Learning: A Study on Cognitive Style, Lateral Eye-Movement and Deductive vs. Inductive Learning of Foreign Language Structures. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Montreal: McGill University.
42. TUCKER, G.H. and SUIB, M.R.
    (1978): Conjugate Lateral Eye Movement (CLEM) Direction and its Relationship to Performance on Verbal and Visuospatial Tasks. Neuropsychologia16.251–254.
    [Google Scholar]
43. WEITEN, W. and ETAUGH, C.F.
    (1973): Lateral Eye Movement as Related to Verbal and Perceptual Motor Skills and Values. Perceptual and Motor Skills36.423–428.
    [Google Scholar]
44. WITKIN, H.A. , GOODENOUGH, D.R. , and KARP, S.A.
    (1967): Stability of Cognitive Style from Childhood to Young Adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology7.291–300.
    [Google Scholar]
45. WITKIN, H.A. , MOORE, C.A. , GOODENOUGH, D.R. , and COX, P.W.
    (1977): Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research47.1–64.
    [Google Scholar]
46. ZAIDEL, E.
    (1985): Introduction. In D.F. Benson and E. Zaidel (eds.), The Dual Brain: Hemispheric Specialization in Humans. New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. ZENHAUSERN. R.
    (1978): Imagery, Cerebral Dominance, and Style of Thinking: Unified Field Model. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society12.381–384.
    [Google Scholar]