1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 87, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 87, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The aim of the present paper was to find out which learning strategies secondary school pupils of different ages employ to acquire complex words in English as their second language: either by applying rules and analogies or by learning by heart. As a working hypothesis, it was postulated that younger pupils probably preferred the latter approach and older pupils the former. In order to test this hypothesis, a 122-item complex word derivation test was devised, containing three categories of words: (1) words of which both the base-form and the derived form had been studied, (2) words of which just the base-form had been studied and (3) words of which neither form had been studied. The test was administered to pupils in three grades of secondary school and a group of 1st year university students of English. Statistical treatment of the data neither confirmed nor falsified the original hypothesis, but it showed many correlations and gave rise to a large number of additional conclusions. Amongst other things, it was concluded that the presence of the proposed tentative change-over in learning approach, from learning words as whole entities to applying word-formation rules, may or may not have been present, but if it were, it had been completely obscured. It was evident from several different indications that a dominant influence on the pupils' scores was exerted by In addition, the data collected revealed numerous correlations concerning the influence of education level, word category, regularity, frequency, etc. Finally, suggestions are given for application of the test results in second language education in secondary school in general.

© 1990 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.87-88.04aik
1990-01-01
2025-02-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/itl.87-88.04aik
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Khuli, M.A.
    1977: The TESL Teacher and English Suffixes. TESL Reporter11: 17–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, M.R.
    1978: Morphological Investigations. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Storrs (Conn.): University of Connecticut.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aronoff, M.
    1976: Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, L.
    1983: English Word-Formation. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Berko, J.
    1958: The Child's Learning of English Morphology. Word14: 150–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Freyd, P. and Baron, J.
    1982: Individual Difference in Acquisition of Derivational Morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviourll21: 282–295.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Kastovsky, D.
    1986: The problem of Productivity in Word Formation. Linguistics24:585–600.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Lehnert, M.
    1973: Reverse Dictionary of Present-Day English. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ljung, M.
    1974: A Frequency Dictionary of English Morphemes. Stockholm: AWE/Gebers.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Marchand, H.
    1969: The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation: a synchronic-diachronic approach. München: C.H. Beck.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Matthews, P.H.
    1974: Morphology: An Introduction to the Theory of Word-Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Meijs, W.J.
    1981: Morphology and Second Language Teaching. In James, A. and Westney, P. , editors, New Linguistic Impulses in Foreign Language Teaching (pp.121–146), Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Pons-Ridler, S.
    1984: Oral Comprehension: A New Approach. British Journal of Language Teaching22: 87–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Selkirk, E.O.
    1981: English Compounding and the Theory of Word Structure, In Moort-gat, M. , van der Hulst, H. and Hoekstra, T. , editors, The Scope of Lexical Rules (pp.229–277), Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Siegel, D.
    1974: Topics in English Morphology. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Smedts, W.
    1979: Lexicale Morfologie: De beheersing van de Woordvorming door Vlaamse "Brugklassers". Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Leuven: Universiteit van Leuven.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/itl.87-88.04aik
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error