1887
Volume 91, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Is Spelling Acquired or Learned? A Re-analysis of Rice (1897) and Cornman (1902), Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/itl.91-92.01kra-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.91-92.01kra
1991-01-01
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. APPLEBEE, A. , LANGER, J. , & MULLIS, I.
    (1987): Grammar, punctuation, and spelling: Controlling the conventions of written English at ages 9, 13, and 17. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BRANDENBURG, G. C.
    (1919): Some possibly secondary factors in spelling ability. School and Society, 9, 632–636.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CLARKE, L.
    (1988): Invented versus traditional spelling in first graders’ writings: Effects on learning to spell and read. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 281–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CONNERS, R. & LUNSFORD, A.
    (1988): Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication, 4, 395–409.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CORNMAN, O.
    (1902): Spelling in the elementary school. Boston: Ginn.
  6. CURTISS, H. & DOLCH, E.
    (1939): Do spelling-books teach spelling?Elementary School Journal, 39, 584–592.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FERGUSON, G.
    (1971): Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FTTZSIMMONS, R. & LOOMER, B.
    (1982): Excerpts from Spelling: Learning and instruction - research and practice. In W. Barbe , A. Francis , and L. Braun (Eds.), Spelling: Basic skills for effective communication (pp.61–79). Columbus, Ohio: Zaner-Bloser, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. FOX, W. & EATON, M.
    (1946): Analysis of spelling proficiency in 82, 833 pupils in grades 2 through 8 in 3, 547 teaching units of the city schools in Indiana. Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University, 22, 9–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GILBERT, L. C.
    (1934a): Effect of spelling on reading in the ninth grade. School Review, 42, 197–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1934b): Effects of reading on spelling in the secondary schools. California Quarterly of Secondary Education, 9, 269–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GILBERT, L.C.
    (1935): Study of the effect of reading on spelling. Journal of Educational Research, 28, 570–576.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GOODMAN, K. & GOODMAN, Y.
    (1982): Spelling ability of a self-taught reader. In F. Gollasch (Ed.), Language and literacy The selected writings of Kenneth S. Goodman , vol.2. (pp.221–226). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GUILES, R.
    (1943): Effect of formal spelling on spelling accuracy. Journal of Educational Research, 37, 284–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HAMMILL, D. , LARSEN, S. , & MCNUTT, G.
    (1977): The effect of spelling instruction: A preliminary study. Elementary School Journal, 78, 67–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HASWELL, R.
    (1988): Error and change in college student writing. Written Communication, 5, 479–499.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. HILDERBRANT, E.
    (1924): Can high school students spell?The School Review, 32, 779–781.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. JOHNSON, R.
    (1917): The persistency of error in English composition. School Review, 25, 555–580.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KRASHEN, S.
    (1981): Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  20. (1982): Principles and practice in second language acqusition. New York: Prentice-Hall.
  21. (1985a): The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. White Plains, New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1985b): Inquiries and insights. Menlo Park, Ca.: Alemany Press.
  23. (1990): The input hypothesis and some competing hypotheses. In R. Courchene and J. St. John (Eds.), Comprehension-based language teaching: Current trends. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KYTE, G.
    (1948): When spelling has been mastered in the elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 42, 47–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LANGE, P.
    (1948): A sampling of composition errors of college freshmen in a course other than English. Journal of Educational Research, 42, 191–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LESTER, J.
    (1922): A study of high school spelling material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 65–74; 152–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. NAGY, W. , HERMAN, P. , & ANDERSON, R.
    (1985): Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly20, 233–253.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. NELL, V.
    (1988) The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly23, 6–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. NISBET, S.
    (1941): The scientific investigation of spelling instruction: Two preliminary problems. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 11, 150.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ORMROD, J.
    (1986): Learning to spell: Three studies at the university level. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 160–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PETERS, M.
    (1985): Spelling: Caught or taught?London: Routledge and Kagen Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PITTS, S. & HIRSCHFIELD, G.
    (1987): Three spelling measures as correlates of reading ability in underprepared college freshmen. Reading Horizons, 27, 103–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RICE, J. M.
    (1897): The futility of the spelling grind. Forum, 23, 163–172, 409419.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. RICHARDS, A.
    (1920): Spelling and the individual system. School and Society, 10, 647–650.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SMITH, F.
    (1981): Reading: What is basic?In M. Douglas (Ed.), Claremont Reading Conference, 45th Yearbook (pp.1–20). Claremont, California: Claremont Graduate School of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. TATE, M.
    (1965): Statistics in education and psychology. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. THOMPSON, R.
    (1930): The effectiveness of modern spelling instruction. Con-tributions to Education, No.436. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. TIDYMAN, W.F.
    (1915): A critical study of Rice’s investigation of spelling efficiency. Pedagogical Seminary, 22, 391–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. TYLER, I. K.
    (1939): Spelling as a secondary learning. Contributions to Education, No.781. Teachers College, Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. WALLIN, J.E.W.
    (1910): Has the drill become obsolescent?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 200–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. WILDE, S.
    (1988): Learning to spell and punctuate: A study of eight- and nine-year-old children. Language and Education, 2, 35–59.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.91-92.01kra
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error