1887
Volume 95, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Pronomina en Pronominal Approach, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/itl.95-96.09dew-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/itl.95-96.09dew
1992-01-01
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bach E.
    (1970), Problominalization, in: Linguistic Inquiry1, 121–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanche-Benveniste C. , Delofeu J. , Stefanini J. , Van den Eynde K.
    (1984), Pronom et syntaxe, l'approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris, Selaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloomfield L.
    (1961;1933), Language. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolinger D.
    (1977), Pronouns and Repeated Nouns. Indiana University Linguistics Club. Bloomington.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1979), Pronouns in Discourse, in: Givón T. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume12, Discourse and Syntax. New York, San Francisco, London, 289–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosch P.
    (1983), Agreement and Anaphora. A Study of the Role of Pronouns in Syntax and Discourse. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Broeders E. , Eggermont C. , Van den Eynde K. , Vangilbergen L.
    (1988), The Pronominal Approach in NLP: A Pronominal Feature Analysis of Coordination in French, in: Computers and Translation3, 177–213.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris Z.S.
    (1966;1947), Structural Linguistics. Chicago, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Harré R. #x0026; Mühlhäusler P.
    (1990), Pronouns and People: The Linguistic construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hartshorne C. #x0026; Weiss P.
    (eds.) (1965), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. VolumesI and II. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hinds J.
    (1977), Paragraph Structure and Pronominalization, in: Papers in Linguistics10, 77–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hiz H.
    (1969), Referentials, in: SemioticaI, 136–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Maes A. & Van den Eynde K.
    (1981), Pronominale Paradigmen en Basissemantiek in de verbale Constructies. Beknopte Schets voor een pronominale Syntaxis van het Nederlands, in: Handelingen van het XXXIIIste Vlaams Filologencongres, Antwerpen, 346–354.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Milner J.-C.
    (1973), Arguments linguistiques.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Quine W.V.O.
    (1964), From a Logical Point of View. 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Reinhart T.
    (1976), The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Ph. D. diss. M.I.T..
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stéfanini J.
    (1976), Jules César Scaliger et son De causis linguae Latinae, in: Parret H. (ed.), History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Berlin, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Swiggers P.
    (1983), Qu'est-ce qu'une théorie (en) linguistique?, in: Modèles linguistiques5, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/itl.95-96.09dew
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error