Pronomina en Pronominal Approach

References

1. Bach E.
   (1970), Problominalization, in: Linguistic Inquiry1, 121–122.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blanche-Benveniste C. , Delofeu J. , Stefanini J. , Van den Eynde K.
   (1984), Pronom et syntaxe, l'approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris, Selaf.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bloomfield L.
   (1961;1933), Language. New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bolinger D.
   (1977), Pronouns and Repeated Nouns. Indiana University Linguistics Club. Bloomington.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bolinger D.
   (1979), Pronouns in Discourse, in: Givón T. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume12, Discourse and Syntax. New York, San Francisco, London, 289–309.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bosch P.
   (1983), Agreement and Anaphora. A Study of the Role of Pronouns in Syntax and Discourse. London.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Broeders E. , Eggermont C. , Van den Eynde K. , Vangilbergen L.
   (1988), The Pronominal Approach in NLP: A Pronominal Feature Analysis of Coordination in French, in: Computers and Translation3, 177–213.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Harris Z.S.
   (1966;1947), Structural Linguistics. Chicago, London.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Harré R. #x0026; Mühlhäusler P.
   (1990), Pronouns and People: The Linguistic construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hartshorne C. #x0026; Weiss P.
    (eds.) (1965), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. VolumesI and II. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hinds J.
    (1977), Paragraph Structure and Pronominalization, in: Papers in Linguistics10, 77–99.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hiz H.
    (1969), Referentials, in: SemioticaI, 136–166.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Maes A. & Van den Eynde K.
    (1981), Pronominale Paradigmen en Basissemantiek in de verbale Constructies. Beknopte Schets voor een pronominale Syntaxis van het Nederlands, in: Handelingen van het XXXIIIste Vlaams Filologencongres, Antwerpen, 346–354.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Milner J.-C.
    (1973), Arguments linguistiques.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Quine W.V.O.
    (1964), From a Logical Point of View. 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Reinhart T.
    (1976), The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Ph. D. diss. M.I.T..
    [Google Scholar]
17. Stéfanini J.
    (1976), Jules César Scaliger et son De causis linguae Latinae, in: Parret H. (ed.), History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics. Berlin, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Swiggers P.
    (1983), Qu'est-ce qu'une théorie (en) linguistique?, in: Modèles linguistiques5, 3–15.
    [Google Scholar]