Volume 97, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0019-0829
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1490
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The present article wants to discuss advantages and limitations of word frequency counts for foreign language teaching and ways of putting them to good use. It will do so along a review of the (the ), (shortly also of) the author-ware and the courseware ), and in a detailed presentation of the current E.E.T.-project in our department, the The whole discussion circles around a sensible and responsible use and manipulation of an amount of objective data, combined with (inter-) subjective choices, into an instrument that allows teacher and learner to manage vocabulary learning from authentic text materials systematically and reliably.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baten, L.
    1981, Text Comprehension: a quantified study of the parameters of difficulty in narrative and expository prose texts read by fourteen year old students. A redefinition of readability in English, with application to Dutch and French on the basis of the interaction reader - (whole) text. PhD dissertation. Urbana: Illinois University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bulteel, J.
    1992, Criteria of vocabulary selection for teaching purposes. Principles, lists, and teaching practice. MA dissertation. KULeuven: Applied linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Engels, L.K.
    1968, “The Fallacy of Word Counts”, IRAL, 10: 213–231
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Engels, L.K. , Van Beckhoven, B. , Leenders, Th. , Brasseur, I.
    1981, LET. Vocabulary-List, Leuven English Teaching Vocabulary List based on objective frequency combined with subjective word-selection. Leuven: Acco nv, 456pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Engels, L.K. , Goethals, M. , Vanermen, U. , Van Beckhoven, B. , Leenders, T.
    1991, Didactic Frequency Research for English as a Foreign Language at the K.U.Leuven. In: Granger, S. (ed.), Perspectives on the English Lexicon. A tribute to Jacques Van Roey. Louvain-la-Neuve: Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 17.1–3, pp. 269–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Geens, D. , Engels, L.K. , Martin, W.
    1975, Leuven Drama Corpus and Frequency List, Leuven: Institute of Applied Linguistics, Occasional paper
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goethals, M. , Engels, L.K. , Leenders, T.
    1990, Automated Analysis of the Vocabulary of English Texts and Generation of Practice Materials: from Main Frame to PC, the Way to the Teacher’s Electronic Desk. In: Halliday, M.A.K. , Gibbons, J. , Howard, N. (eds.), Learning Keeping and Using Language II, Selected papers fromthe 8th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Sydney, August 16-21, 1987, pp.231–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Hindmarsh’s
    Cambridge English Lexicon 1980, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johansson, S.
    1980, “The L.O.B. Corpus of British English Texts: Presentation and comments”. ALLC Journal1 (1), 25–36
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Krashen, S.D.
    1982, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kucera, H. , Francis, W.N.
    1967, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Language Learning in Europe: the Challenge of Diversity 1989 Conference Report ofthe final conference of the modern languages Project No. 12, 22-25 March 1988. Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Co-operation, Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LDOCE
    LDOCE 1978Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Chief Editor P. Procter . London: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Leenders, T. , Engels, L.K.
    1988, 1989, 1991, A.D.A.M & E.V.E (computersoftware; authoring programme); A.D.A.M. & E.V.E1991 is published byOxford University Press in association with CoMet Verlag für Unterrichtsoftware (Duisburg).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marzano, R.J. , Marzano, J.S.
    1988, A Cluster Approach. Newark (Delaware): International Reading Association
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Richards, J.C.
    1971, “Word Familiarity as an Index of Vocabulary Selection with Indices for 4495 Words”. PhD Dissertation, Université de Laval, Canada. Unpublished ms.
  17. Richards, I A
    1944, Basic English and its Uses. New York: W.W. Norton & C°
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sinclair, J.
    (ed.) 1987, Looking up. An account of the COBUILD Project in lexical computing. London: Collins
    [Google Scholar]
  19. van Ek, J.A. , Alexander, L.G. , Fitzpatrick, M.A.
    1980, Waystage English. Oxford: Pergamon Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. van Ek, J.A. , Alexander, L.G.
    1982, Threshold Level English. Oxford: Pergamon Press
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van Ek, J.A. , Trim, J.L.M.
    1991a, Waystage 1990. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1991b, Threshold Level 1990. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vanermen, U.
    1991, “Comprehension-Training Package for Dutch-speaking Learners of English (CTP)”. In: Verlinde, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Differentiation in LSP, Learning and Teaching. Leuven: ACCO
    [Google Scholar]
  24. West, M.
    1953, A General Service List of English Words. Rev. Ed.London: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1977, An International Readefs Dictionary. Defining Vocabulary. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Alexander, L.G. , Kingsbury, R.
    1980, Follow Me, Book 1, Book 2. London: Longman
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Blundell, J.
    1984, English VISA, Teacher’s book 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dentant, J. , Shaw, W. & Shaw, J. , Wendelen, R.
    1989, By All Means, 1A. Deurne: Plantyn
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunn, O.
    1987, Outset, Pupil’s Book 1. London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ellis, M. , Ellis, P.
    1985, Counterpoint, Coursebook-Beginners, Coursebook-Elementary. Walton-on-Thames: Nelson
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hermans, E. , Benson, D.
    1988, Channel, 1. Kapellen: DNB/Pelckmans
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mellgren, L , Walker, M. , Dehaan, W. , Lammerse, J.
    1978 Mainstream, Textbook 1HV. Zutphen: Thieme
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rutten, H. , Van Ruyssevelt, F.
    1986, Notting Hill Gate, Textbook 1, Textbook 2. Den Bosch: Malmberg
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vanden Borre, J. , Claeys, G. , Maclean, A.L.
    1989,1991, Contact, 1, 2. Leuven: Wolters
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Willis, J. & Willis, D.
    1988, Collins COBUILD English Course, Student’s Book 1, Student’s Book 2. London: Collins
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error