Implicit argumentation and persuasion

References

1. Aslanidis, Paris
   2016 “Populist Social Movements of the Great Recession.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly213: 301–321. 10.17813/1086‑671X‑20‑3‑301
   https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-3-301 [Google Scholar]
2. Bredart, Serge and Karin Modolo
   1988 “Moses strikes again: Focalization effect on a semantic illusion.” Acta Psychologica67: 135–144. 10.1016/0001‑6918(88)90009‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(88)90009-1 [Google Scholar]
3. Caffi, Claudia
   2003 “Mitigation”. InPragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. byMarina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 257–285. Berlin-Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caffi, Claudia
   2012 “Mezzi linguistici della mitigazione in italiano: risultati e prospettive di ricerca”. In: Grammatica e pragmatica, = Atti del XXXIV Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia – Roma, 22–24 ottobre 2009, ed. byFranca Orletti, Anna Pompei, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, 147–189. Roma: Il Calamo.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chafe, Wallace
   1987 “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow”. InCoherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. byRussell S. Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
6. Chafe, Wallace
   1992 “Information Flow in Speaking and Writing”. InThe Linguistics of Literacy, ed. byPamela Downing, Susan D. Lima and Michael Noonan, 17–29. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.21.05cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.05cha [Google Scholar]
7. Christiansen, Morten and Nick Chater
   2016 “The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences39:1–19. 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1500031X [Google Scholar]
8. Cresti, Emanuela
   2000 Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Danler, Paul
   2005 “Morpho-syntactic and textual realizations as deliberate pragmatic argumentative linguistic tools?” InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, ed. byLouis De Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 45–60. Amsterdam-Philadelphia, Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.17.04dan
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.04dan [Google Scholar]
10. Ducrot, Oswald
    1972 Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Erickson, Thomas D., and Mark E. Mattson
    1981 “From words to meanings: A semantic illusion.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior205: 540–551. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(81)90165‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1 [Google Scholar]
12. Gigerenzer, Gerd
    2008 “Why heuristics work”. Perspectives on Psychological Science31, 20–29. 10.1111/j.1745‑6916.2008.00058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x [Google Scholar]
13. Givón, Talmy
    1982 “Evidentiality and Epistemic Space”. Studies in Language61: 23–49. 10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv [Google Scholar]
14. Grice, Herbert P.
    1957 “Meaning”. The Philosophical Review66: 377–388. 10.2307/2182440
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440 [Google Scholar]
15. Grice, Herbert P.
    1975 “Logic and Conversation”. InSyntax and Semantics vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    1986 L’Implicite. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Krebs, John R., and Richard Dawkins
    1984 “Animal Signals: Mind-reading and Manipulation”. InBehavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, ed. byJohn R. Krebs, and Nicholas B. Davies, 380–402. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lewiński, Marcin
    2011 “Towards a critique-friendly approach to the straw man fallacy evaluation”. Argumentation25(2): 469–497. 10.1007/s10503‑011‑9227‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9227-6 [Google Scholar]
19. Lewis, David
    1979 “Scorekeeping in a language game”. Journal of Philosophical Logic8: 339–359. 10.1007/BF00258436
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00258436 [Google Scholar]
20. Loftus, Elizabeth F.
    1975 “Leading Questions and the Eyewitness Report”. Cognitive Psychology7: 550–572. 10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90023‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7 [Google Scholar]
21. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    1993 “Clausole a contenuto presupposto e loro funzione discorsiva in italiano antico”. Quaderni del dipartimento di Linguistica dell’Università di Firenze4: 71–95.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    1995 “Tratti linguistici della persuasione in pubblicità”. Lingua Nostra2(3): 41–51.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2009a “Grice elettorale”. InLinguistica e Società. Studi in onore di Franca Orletti, ed. byMarilena Fatigante, Laura Mariottini, and Eleonora Sciubba, 172–184. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2009b La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2016 “The “exaptation” of linguistic implicit strategies”. SpringerPlus51: 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
    2019 La lingua disonesta. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo, and Viviana Masia
    2014 “Implicitness Impact: Measuring texts”. Journal of Pragmatics61: 161–184. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.010 [Google Scholar]
28. Macagno, Fabrizio
    2015 “Presupposition as Argumentative Reasoning”. InInterdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. byAlessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 465–487. Heidelberg-New York-Dordrecht-London: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Machetti, Sabrina
    2006 Uscire dal vago. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Machetti, Sabrina
    2011 “La vaghezza linguistica come problema della pragmatica. Questioni teoriche e dati a confronto”. Esercizi filosofici6: 195–213.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mercier, Hugo
    2009 La Théorie Argumentative du Raisonnement. PhD dissertation, E.H.E.S.S.Paris.
32. Mercier, Hugo, and Dan Sperber
    2011 “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences34(2): 57–74. 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968 [Google Scholar]
33. Oswald, Steve, Didier Maillat and Louis de Saussure
    2016 “Deceptive and uncooperative verbal communication”. InVerbal communication Handbooks of communicative science3, ed. byLouis de Saussure and Andrea Rocci, 509–534. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Peirce, Charles Sanders
    1902 “Vague”. InJ. M. Baldwin (ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Petrilli, Raffaella
    2016 La lingua politica. Lessico e strutture argomentative. Carocci, Roma.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Reboul, Anne
    2011 “A relevance-theoretic account of the evolution of implicit communication.” Studies in Pragmatics13: 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rigotti, Eddo
    1988 “Significato e senso”. InRicerche di semantica testuale, ed. byAA.VV., 71–120. Brescia: La Scuola.
    [Google Scholar]
38. de Saussure, Louis
    2013 “Background relevance”. Journal of Pragmatics59, 178–189. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.009 [Google Scholar]
39. de Saussure, Louis and Steve Oswald
    2009 “Argumentation et engagement du locuteur. Pour un point de vue subjectiviste”. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française29: 215–243.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sbisà, Marina
    2007 Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sperber, Dan, Francesco Cara and Vittorio Girotto
    1995 “Relevance Theory explains the Selection Task”. Cognition57:31–95. 10.1016/0010‑0277(95)00666‑M
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M [Google Scholar]
42. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi and Deirdre Wilson
    2010 “Epistemic Vigilance”. Mind and Language25(4): 359–393. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
43. Stalnaker, Robert
    2002 “Common ground”. Linguistics and Philosophy25: 701–721. 10.1023/A:1020867916902
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
44. Strawson, Peter F.
    1964 “Identifying Reference and Truth-Values”. Theoria302: 96–118. Rep. in Idem, Logico-Linguistic Papers, London: Methuen 1971, 75–95.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman
    1974 “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science185(4157): 1124–1131. 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 [Google Scholar]
46. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Voghera, Miriam
    2012 “Chitarre, violini, banjo e cose del genere”. InPer Tullio De Mauro, ed. byAnna M. Thornton and Miriam Voghera, 429–460. Roma: Aracne.
    [Google Scholar]