oa Multimodal rhetoric and argumentation

References

1. Archer, Arelene, and Travis Noakes
   2020 “Multimodal Academic Argument in Data Visualization.” InData Visualization in Society, ed. byMartin Engebretsen, and Helen Kennedy, 239–256. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bateman, John A.
   2018 “Position Paper on Argument and Multimodality.” International Review of Pragmatics101:294–308. 10.1163/18773109‑01002008
   https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01002008 [Google Scholar]
3. Bateman, John A., Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala
   2017 Multimodality. Foundations, Research and Analysis: A Problem-oriented Introduction. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Birdsell, David S., and Leo Groarke
   1996 “Toward a Theory of Visual Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy331:1–10.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blair, J. Anthony
   2015 “Probative Norms for Multimodal Visual Arguments.” Argumentation291:217–233. 10.1007/s10503‑014‑9333‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9333-3 [Google Scholar]
6. Champagne, Marc, and Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
   2020 “Why Images Cannot be Arguments, but Moving Ones Might.” Argumentation34 (2): 207–236. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09484‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09484-0 [Google Scholar]
7. Eckstein, Justin
   2021 “The Rhetoric of Sound Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly51 (3):240–246. 10.1080/02773945.2021.1918517
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2021.1918517 [Google Scholar]
8. Frápolli, María J.
   2023 The Priority of Propositions. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Logic. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑25229‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25229-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Gonçalves-Segundo, Paulo Roberto, Fabrizio Macagno, and Isabel C. M. de Azevedo
   2021 “Multimodal Argumentation: Challenges and Recent Trends: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Revista da Abralin20 (3):722–736. 10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.2020
   https://doi.org/10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.2020 [Google Scholar]
10. Grancea, Ioana
    2017 “Types of Visual Arguments.” Argumentum15 (2):16–34.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gries, Laurie
    2020 “Advances in Visual Rhetorical Analysis.” InThe SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, ed. byLuc Pauwels, and Dawn Mannay, 381–396. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781526417015.n24
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526417015.n24 [Google Scholar]
12. Groarke, Leo
    2018 “Auditory Arguments: The Logic of ‘Sound’ Arguments.” Informal Logic38 (3): 312–340. 10.22329/il.v38i3.4954
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i3.4954 [Google Scholar]
13. Groarke, Leo
    2020 “Visual Argument Schemes in the PTA.” InProceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Volume I, ed. byC. Dutilh Novaes , 561–577. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Groarke, Leo, Catherine H. Palczewski, and David Godden
    2016 “Navigating the Visual Turn in Argument.” Argumentation & Advocacy521:17–235. 10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871 [Google Scholar]
15. Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Otto Halmesvaara, and Inari Sakki
    2020 “Persuasion through Bitter Humor: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Rhetoric in Internet Memes of Two Far-Right Groups in Finland.” Social Media + Society6 (2):1–11. 10.1177/2056305120921575
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575 [Google Scholar]
16. Jones, Madison
    2022 “Tracking Memes in the Wild: Visual Rhetoric and Image Circulation in Environmental Communication.” Frontiers in Communication71. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.883278
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.883278 [Google Scholar]
17. Kiili, Carita
    2021 “Students’ Interpretations of a Persuasive Multimodal Video about Vaccines.” Journal of Literacy Research53 (2):196–218. 10.1177/1086296X211009296
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211009296 [Google Scholar]
18. Kišiček, Gabrijela
    2022 “Sonic Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Spoken Language.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion, ed. byJ. Fahnestock, and R. A. Harris, 131–146. Milton: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367823658‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367823658-10 [Google Scholar]
19. Kjeldsen, Jens E.
    2015a “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation291:115–132. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9348‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4 [Google Scholar]
20. Kjeldsen, Jens E.
    2015b “The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.” Argumentation291:197–215. 10.1007/s10503‑014‑9342‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9342-2 [Google Scholar]
21. Kjeldsen, Jens, and Aaron Hess
    2021 “Experiencing Multimodal Rhetoric and Argumentation in Political Advertisements: A Study of How People Respond to the Rhetoric of Multimodal Communication.” Visual Communication20 (3):327–352. 10.1177/14703572211013399
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211013399 [Google Scholar]
22. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
    2021 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lilleker, Darren, and Anastasia Veneti
    (eds) 2023 Research Handbook on Visual Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781800376939
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376939 [Google Scholar]
24. Lv, Junyi
    2022 “Crafting Multimodal Argumentative Meshworks: Li Ziqi’s ‘Mushroom at The End of the World’.” Journal of Argumentation in Context11 (3):329–349. 10.1075/jaic.21010.lv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21010.lv [Google Scholar]
25. Macagno, Fabrizio, and Rosalice B. W. S. Pinto
    2021 “Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory.” Argumentation351:141–176. 10.1007/s10503‑020‑09525‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09525-z [Google Scholar]
26. Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino, Selen A. Ercan, and Hans Asenbaum
    2022 “More than Words: A Multidimensional Approach to Deliberative Democracy”. Political Studies70 (1):153–172. 10.1177/0032321720950561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720950561 [Google Scholar]
27. Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna, and Agnieszka Kampka
    2021 “Creative Reconstructions of Political Imagery in an Instagram-Based Election Campaign: Implications for Visual Rhetorical Literacy.” Creativity Studies14 (2):307–322. 10.3846/cs.2021.14524
    https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.14524 [Google Scholar]
28. Norris, Sigrid
    2019 Systematically Working with Multimodal Data: Research Methods in Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119168355
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168355 [Google Scholar]
29. Novak, Marko
    2024 The Logic of Legal Argumentation. Multi-Modal Perspectives. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pereira, Andrew
    2018 “Exploring the Multimodal Argument: The Interplay of Multimodality and Attention Economy.” Pedagogies: An International Journal13 (3):201–221. 10.1080/1554480X.2017.1399796
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1399796 [Google Scholar]
31. Pflaeging, Jana, and Hartmut Stöckl
    2021a “The Rhetoric of Multimodal Communication.” Visual Communication20 (3):319–326. 10.1177/14703572211010200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211010200 [Google Scholar]
32. Pflaeging, Jana, and Hartmut Stöckl
    2021b “Tracing the Shapes of Multimodal Rhetoric: Showing the Epistemic Powers of Visualization. “Visual Communication20 (3):397–414. 10.1177/14703572211010370
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211010370 [Google Scholar]
33. Puppo, Federico
    (ed) 2019 Informal Logic: A ‘Canadian’ Approach to Argument. Windsor, ON: Windsor Studies in Argumentation. 10.22329/wsia.09.2019
    https://doi.org/10.22329/wsia.09.2019 [Google Scholar]
34. Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco
    2019 Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04568‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5 [Google Scholar]
35. Rocci, Andrea, and Chiara Pollaroli
    2018 “Introduction: Multimodality in Argumentation.” Semiotica2201:1–17. 10.1515/sem‑2017‑0150
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0150 [Google Scholar]
36. Roderick, Noah
    2023 “Exigence at the Dawn of Recommendation Media: Dramatizing Salience in Audio Memes.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly:1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Santibáñez, Cristián
    2018 “Arguing with Images as Extended Cognition.” Informal Logic38 (4):531–549. 10.22329/il.v38i4.5052
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i4.5052 [Google Scholar]
38. Schreieder, Tobias, and Jan Braker
    2023 “Touché 2022 Best of Labs: Neural Image Retrieval for Argumentation.” InInternational Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages, ed. byAvi Arampatzis , 186–197. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑42448‑9_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42448-9_16 [Google Scholar]
39. Seiter, John S., and Harry Weger
    2020 Nonverbal Communication in Political Debates. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Serafis, Dimitris
    2023 Authoritarianism on the Front Page: Multimodal Discourse and Argumentation in Times of Multiple Crises in Greece. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.99
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.99 [Google Scholar]
41. Stöckl, Hartmut
    2024 “Fresh Perspectives on Multimodal Argument Reconstruction.” Frontiers in Communication91:1–6. ( 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1366182)
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1366182 [Google Scholar]
42. Stöckl, Hartmut
    2019 “Linguistic Multimodality – Multimodal Linguistics: A State-of-the-Art Sketch.” InMultimodality: Disciplinary Thoughts and the Challenge of Diversity, ed. byJanina Wildfeuer , 41–68. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110608694‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110608694-002 [Google Scholar]
43. Stöckl, Hartmut, and Jana Pflaeging
    2022 “Multimodal Coherence Revisited: Notes on the Move from Theory to Data in Annotating Print Advertisements.” Frontiers in Communication71:1–17. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.900994
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.900994 [Google Scholar]
44. Tseronis, Assimakis
    2020 “The Prospects for Multimodal Schemes of Argument: Assessing the Spoofing Strategies in Subvertisements of the Tobacco Industry.” InProceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Volume I, ed. byC. Dutilh Novaes , 579–592. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tseronis, Assimakis
    2021 “From Visual Rhetoric to Multimodal Argumentation: Exploring the Rhetorical and Argumentative Relevance of Multimodal Figures on the Covers of The Economist.” Visual Communication20 (3):374–396. 10.1177/14703572211005498
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211005498 [Google Scholar]
46. Tseronis, Assimakis, and Charles Forceville
    (eds) 2017 Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14 [Google Scholar]
47. Tseronis, Assimakis, and Chiara Pollaroli
    2018 “Introduction: Pragmatic Insights or Multimodal Argumentation.” International Review of Pragmatics101:147–157. 10.1163/18773109‑01002001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01002001 [Google Scholar]
48. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
49. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
50. Wildfeuer, Janina, and Joseph Addika Coffie
    2022 “#socialiseresponsibly: Analyzing the Rhetorical Structure of Heineken TV Commercials During the Pandemic.” Frontiers in Communication71. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.887706
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.887706 [Google Scholar]
51. Wu, Ting
    2020 “Reasoning and Appraisal in Multimodal Argumentation: Analyzing Building a community of shared future for humankind.” Chinese Semiotic Studies16 (3):419–438. 10.1515/css‑2020‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2020-0023 [Google Scholar]
52. Žagar, Igor Ž.
    2021 “Methodological Problems in Analysing Non-verbal Arguments: The Case of Visual Argumentation.” InMultimodality, Digitalization and Cognitivity in Communication and Pedagogy, ed. byNatalya V. Sukhova, Tatiana Dubrovskaya, and Yulia A. Lobina, 49–69. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑84071‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84071-6_4 [Google Scholar]
53. Zhang, Chuanrui, and Cihua Xu
    2017 “Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in Video Advertising: The Case of the Lin Dan Commercial.” Journal of Argumentation in Context6 (3):359–380. 10.1075/jaic.17002.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17002.zha [Google Scholar]
54. Zhang, Chuanrui, and Cihua Xu
    2018 “Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study.” Argumentation32 (4):501–517. 10.1007/s10503‑018‑9455‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9455-0 [Google Scholar]