Auditory arguments, advertising, and argumentation theory

References

1. Aguinis, Herman, M. Melissa Simonsen, and Charles A. Pierce
   1998 “Effects of Nonverbal Behavior on Perceptions of Power Bases.” The Journal of Social Psychology138 (4):455–469. 10.1080/00224549809600400
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600400 [Google Scholar]
2. Berry, Diane
   1991 “Accuracy in Social Perception: Contributions on Facial and Vocal Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology621:298–307. 10.1037/0022‑3514.61.2.298
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.298 [Google Scholar]
3. Berry, Diane
   1992 “Vocal Types and Stereotypes: Joint Effects of Vocal Attractiveness and Vocal Maturity on Person Perception.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior181:187–197. 10.1007/BF02170025
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170025 [Google Scholar]
4. Birdsell, David, and Leo Groarke
   (eds) 2007 “Special Double Issue on Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy: The Journal of the American Forensic Association43 (3–4).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Birdsell, David, and Leo Groarke
   (eds) 1996 “Special Double Issue on Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy: The Journal of the American Forensic Association33 (1–2).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blair, J. Anthony
   (ed) 2021 Studies in Critical Thinking (2nd ed). Windsor: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bloom, Kathleen, David Zajac, and Julie Titus
   1999 “The Influence of Nasality of Voice on Sex-stereotyped Perceptions.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior23 (4):271–281. 10.1023/A:1021650809431
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021650809431 [Google Scholar]
8. Burgoon, Judee K., Thomas Birk, and Michael Pfau
   1990 “Nonverbal Behaviours, Persuasion and Credibility.” Human Communication Research17 (1):140–169. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1990.tb00229.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00229.x [Google Scholar]
9. Dove, Ian J.
   2016 “Visual Scheming: Assessing Visual Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy52 (1):254–264. 10.1080/00028533.2016.11821873
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2016.11821873 [Google Scholar]
10. Eckstein, Justin
    2017 “Sound Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy53 (1): 63–180. 10.1080/00028533.2017.1337328
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2017.1337328 [Google Scholar]
11. Ferreira, Ivone
    2021 “Advertising as a Rhetorical Metagenre.” InMedia Rhetoric: How Advertising and Digital Media Influence Us, ed. bySamuel Mateus, 29–45. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Graakjær, Nicolai Jørgensgaari, and Anders Bonde
    2018 “Non-Musical Sound Branding: A Conceptualization and Research Overview.” European Journal of Marketing52 (7):1505–25. 10.1108/EJM‑09‑2017‑0609
    https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2017-0609 [Google Scholar]
13. Graakjær, Nicolai Jørgensgaari
    2015 Analyzing Music in Advertising: Television Commercials and Consumer Choice. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Grancea, Ioana
    2016 “Visual Modes of Ethotic Argumentation: An Exploratory Inquiry,” Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences3 (4): 375–389. 10.5840/symposion20163430
    https://doi.org/10.5840/symposion20163430 [Google Scholar]
15. Groarke, Leo, Catherine H. Palczewski and David Godden
    (eds) 2016 “Special Issue: Twenty Years of Visual Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy52 (4).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Groarke, Leo
    2018 “Auditory Arguments: The Logic of ‘Sound’ Arguments.” Informal Logic38 (3):312–340. 10.22329/il.v38i3.4954
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i3.4954 [Google Scholar]
17. Groarke, Leo, and Gabrijela Kišiček
    2016 “Compassion, Authority and Baby Talk: Prosody and Objectivity.” InArgumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation conference, ed. byLaura Benacquista, and Patrick Bondy. Windsor: University of Windsor.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Groarke, Leo
    2015 “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?” Argumentation291:133–155. 10.1007/s10503‑014‑9336‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0 [Google Scholar]
19. Guyer, Johsua
    2019 “Nonverbal Behaviour of Persuasive Sources: A Multiple Process Analysis.” Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour431:203–31. 10.1007/s10919‑018‑00291‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-018-00291-x [Google Scholar]
20. Häusermann, Jürg
    2018 “Sound Studies and the Political Components of the Auditory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Media, ed. byColleen Cotter, and Daniel Perrin, 211–229. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hickson, Mark, Don Stacks, and Nina Moore
    2004 Nonverbal Communication: Studies and Applications. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kimble, Charles E., and Steven D. Seidel
    1991 “Vocal Signs of Confidence.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior151:99–105. 10.1007/BF00998265
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00998265 [Google Scholar]
23. Kišiček, Gabrijela
    2014 “The Role of Paralinguistic Features in the Analysis of Multimodal Argumentation.” InProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Argumentation, ed. byBart Garssen, David Godden, Francisca Henkemans, and Gordon Mitchell, 730–741. Amsterdam: Sic-Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kišiček, Gabrijela
    2016 “Prosodic Features in the Analysis of Multimodal Argumentation.” InArgumentation and Reasoned Action, ed. byDima Mohamed, and Marcin Lewinski, 629–643. Rickmansworth: Collage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kišiček, Gabrijela
    2018 “Can We Translate Sounds into Words? A Response to Leo Groarke’s ‘Auditory Arguments: The Logic of ‘Sound’ Arguments’.” Informal Logic38 (3):346–361. 10.22329/il.v38i3.5223
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i3.5223 [Google Scholar]
26. Kjeldsen, Jens
    2015 “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation291:115–132. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9348‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4 [Google Scholar]
27. Kjeldsen, Jens
    2018 “The Rhetoric of Sound, the Sound of Arguments: Three Propositions, Three Questions, and an Afterthought for the Study of Sonic and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation and Advocacy1 (8):364–371. 10.1080/10511431.2018.1525013
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2018.1525013 [Google Scholar]
28. Köksall, Fatma and Umit Inatci
    2021 “Artwork as Representation in Advertising: A Visual Rhetorical Perspective.” InMedia Rhetoric: How Advertising and Digital Media Influence Us, ed. bySamuel Mateus, 45–61. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kress, Gunther
    2001 “Sociolinguistics and Social Semiotics.” InThe Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, ed. byPaul Cobley, 66–83. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Oosterhof, Nikolaas, and Alexander Todorov
    2008 “The Functional Basis of Face Evaluation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America105 (32):11087–11092. 10.1073/pnas.0805664105
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105 [Google Scholar]
31. Pollaroli, Chiara
    2013 “T(r)opical Patterns in Advertising.” InVirtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. byDima Mohamed, and Marcin Lewinski. Windsor: University of Windsor.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rezlescu, Constantin
    2015 “Dominant Voices and Attractive Faces: The Contribution of Visual and Auditory Information to Integrated Person Impressions.” Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour391:355–370. 10.1007/s10919‑015‑0214‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-015-0214-8 [Google Scholar]
33. Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco
    2019 The Inferential Configuration of Arguments: The Argumentum Model of Topics: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Amsterdam: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04568‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5 [Google Scholar]
34. Ripley, M. Louise
    2008 “Argumentation Theorists Argue that an Ad is an Argument.” Argumentation22 (4):507–519. 10.1007/s10503‑008‑9102‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9102-2 [Google Scholar]
35. Slade, Cristina
    2003 “Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisements.” Argumentation17 (2):145–160. 10.1023/A:1024025114369
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024025114369 [Google Scholar]
36. Sousa, Alfredo
    2011 Os géneros retóricos e a mediatização do discurso político. Paper presented atI Congresso Internacional de Retórica Política, (The rhetorical genres and the mediatization of political discourse. Paper presented at I International Congress of Political Rhetoric)Madrid, January 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Spang, Kurt
    1979 Fundamentos de Retórica Literaria y Publicitaria. (Fundamentals of Literary and Advertising Rhetoric) Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stöckl, Hartmut
    2024 “Detecting generic patterns in multimodal argumentation: A corpus-based study of environmental protection print-ads.” Journal of Argumentation in Context13 (2):260–291.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tseronis, Assimakis, and Charles Forceville
    2017 “Argumentation and Rhetoric in Visual and Multimodal Communication.” InMultimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres, ed. byAssimakis Tseronis, and Charles Forceville, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.14.01tse
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.01tse [Google Scholar]
40. Tseronis, Assimakis, Ramy Younis, and Mehmet A. Üzelgün
    2024 “A proposal for the evaluation of multimodal argumentation: Assessing reasonableness and effectiveness in environmental campaign posters.” Journal of Argumentation in Context13 (2):292–317.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vukovic, Jovana
    2011 “Variation in Perceptions of Physical Dominance and Trustworthiness Predicts Individual Differences in the Effect of Relationship Context on Women’s Preferences for Masculine Pitch in Men’s Voices.” British Journal of Psychology102 (1):37–48. 10.1348/000712610X498750
    https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X498750 [Google Scholar]
42. Way, Lyndon, Simon McKerrell, and Paul Bouissac
    (eds) 2017 Music as Multimodal Discourse: Semiotics, Power and Protest. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wildfeuer, Janina, and Chiara Pollaroli
    2017 “Seeing the untold: Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers.” Argumentation in Context141:190–216.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Willis, Janine, and Alexander Todorov
    2006 “First Impressions: Making up Your Mind after a 100-ms Exposure to a Face.” Psychological Science17 (7):592–598. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2006.01750.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x [Google Scholar]
45. Zuckerman, Miron, Holley Hodgins, and Kunitate Miyake
    1990 “The Vocal Attractiveness Stereotype: Replication and Elaboration.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior141:97–112. 10.1007/BF01670437
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01670437 [Google Scholar]
46. Zuckerman, Miron, and Kunitate Miyake
    1993 “The Attractive Voice: What Makes it So?” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior171:119–135. 10.1007/BF01001960
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001960 [Google Scholar]