oa Critical reconstructions of populist multimodal argumentation

References

1. Amossy, R.
   2009 “The New Rhetoric’s Inheritance: Argumentation and Discourse Analysis.” Argumentation23 (3):313–324. 10.1007/s10503‑009‑9154‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9154-y [Google Scholar]
2. Atkins, J., and A. Finlayson
   2013 “‘… A 40-Year-Old Black Man Made the Point to Me’: Everyday Knowledge and the Performance of Leadership in Contemporary British Politics.” Political Studies61 (1):161–177. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2012.00953.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00953.x [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. & McEnery, T.
   2013 Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baishya, A.
   2015 “#NaMo: The Political Work of the Selfie in the 2014 Indian General Elections.” International Journal of Communication91:1686–1700.
   [Google Scholar]
5. De Cleen, B., and Y. Stavrakakis
   2017 “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost The Public24 (4):301–319. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
6. Doiciar, C., and R. Crețan
   2021 “Pandemic Populism: COVID-19 and the Rise of the Nationalist AUR Party in Romania.” Geographica Pannonica25 (4):243–259. 10.5937/gp25‑33782
   https://doi.org/10.5937/gp25-33782 [Google Scholar]
7. Elgenius, G. & Rydgren, J.
   2017 The Sweden “Democrats and the ethno-nationalist rhetoric of decay and betrayal”sociologisk forskning54 (4):353–358.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Engesser, S.
   2017 “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society20 (8):1109–1126. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697 [Google Scholar]
9. Ernst, N.
   2019 “Favorable Opportunity Structures for Populist Communication: Comparing Different Types of Politicians and Issues in Social Media, Television and the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics24 (2):165–188. 10.1177/1940161218819430
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430 [Google Scholar]
10. Fairclough, I.
    2016 “Evaluating Policy as Argument: The Public Debate over the First UK Austerity Budget.” Critical Discourse Studies13 (1):57–77. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1074595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1074595 [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, I.
    (forthcoming). Frames and Inferences. InProceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Argumentation. Studies in Logic and Argumentation series ed. by A. Ansani, M. Marini and F. Paglieri, 160–172. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fairclough, I., & Mădroane, I. D.
    2020 An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”: Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict. Co-herencia, 17 (32), 119–158. 10.17230/co‑herencia.17.32.5
    https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.5 [Google Scholar]
13. Finlayson, A.
    2018 “‘Dancing with Doxa’: A ‘Rhetorical Political Analysis’ of David Cameron’s Sense of Britishness.” InDoing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse, ed. byM. Kranert and G. Horan, 59–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.80.03fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.80.03fin [Google Scholar]
14. Georgiadou, V.
    2019 Η άκρα δεξιά στην Ελλάδα 1965–2018 [The Extreme Right in Greece 1965–2018]. Athens: Kastaniotis.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Greco Morasso, S.
    2012 “Contextual Frames and Their Argumentative Implications: A Case Study in Media Argumentation.” Discourse Studies14 (2):197–216. 10.1177/1461445611433636
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433636 [Google Scholar]
16. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1973 Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1978 Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heshmati, Bita and Ewa Modrzejewska
    2024 “How we argue about the use of images: Metavisual disputes in practice.” Journal of Argumentation in Context13 (2):203–231.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ibañez Sales, M.
    2023 “The Refugee Crisis’ Double Standards: Media Framing and the Proliferation of Positive and Negative Narratives during the Ukrainian and Syrian Crises.” EuroMeSCo Policy Brief1291.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave
    2007 “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research46 (3):319–345. 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2006.00690.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x [Google Scholar]
22. Jungar, A-C.
    2016 “The Sweden Democrats”. InUnderstanding Populist Party Organisation: The Radical Right in Western Europe, ed. byR. Heinish and O. Mazzoleni, 189–219. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58197‑6_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58197-6_8 [Google Scholar]
23. Katsambekis, G. and A. Kioupkiolis
    (eds) 2019 The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180823
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180823 [Google Scholar]
24. Kjeldsen, J.
    2017 “The Rhetorical and Argumentative Potentials of Press Photography.” InMultimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres, ed. byA. Tseronis and C. Forceville, 51–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.14.03kje
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.03kje [Google Scholar]
25. Kreis, R.
    2017 “The ‘Tweet Politics’ of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4):607–618. 10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre [Google Scholar]
26. Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen
    2021 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd ed). London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Krzyżanowski, M.
    2018 “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2):76–96. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897 [Google Scholar]
28. Krzyżanowski, M.
    2020 “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics30 (4):503–527. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199 [Google Scholar]
29. Krzyżanowski, M., A. Triandafyllidou, and R. Wodak
    2018 “The Mediatization and the Politicization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Europe.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2):1–14. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189 [Google Scholar]
30. Laclau, E.
    2007 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ledin, P., and D. Machin
    2020 Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350069176
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350069176 [Google Scholar]
32. Lorenzetti, M. I.
    2020 “Right-Wing Populism and the Representation of Immigrants on Social Media: A Critical Multimodal Analysis.” Iperstoria151:59–95.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Machin, D., and A. Mayr
    2012 How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Machin, D.
    2013 “What is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies?” Critical Discourse Studies10(4): 347–355.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mercuri, C.
    2023 “Characterization Frames Constructing endoxa in Activists’ Discourse about the Public Controversy Surrounding Fashion Sustainability.” Topoi421:635–650. 10.1007/s11245‑023‑09909‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09909-2 [Google Scholar]
36. Mohammed, D.
    2019 “Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What Is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?” Argumentation331:307–322. 10.1007/s10503‑018‑9473‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-9473-y [Google Scholar]
37. Moffit, B.
    2016 The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mouffe, C.
    2005 “The ‘End’ of Politics and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism.” InPopulism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. byF. Panizza, 72–98. London/New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mudde, C.
    2016 “The Study of Populist Radical Right Parties: Toward a Fourth Wave.” C-Rex Working Paper Series (1):1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Mudde, C.
    2017 The Far Right in America. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315160764
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160764 [Google Scholar]
41. Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser
    2013 “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government and Opposition48 (2):147–174. 10.1017/gov.2012.11
    https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11 [Google Scholar]
42. Mudde, C., and C. Rovira Kaltwasser
    2017 Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Pelinka, A.
    2013 “Right-Wing Populism: Concept and Typology.” InRight-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, ed. byR. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik and B. Mral, 3–22. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781472544940.ch‑001
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940.ch-001 [Google Scholar]
44. Richardson, J. E.
    2004 (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9 [Google Scholar]
45. Rigotti, E., and S. Greco
    2019 Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑04568‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5 [Google Scholar]
46. Rovira Kaltwasser, C.
    (eds) 2017 The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
47. Rydgren, J., K. Jylhä, and P. Strimling
    2019 “Radical Right-Wing Voters from Right and Left: Comparing Sweden Democrat Voters Who Previously Voted for the Conservative Party or the Social Democratic Party.” Scandinavian Political Studies42 (3–4):220–244. 10.1111/1467‑9477.12147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12147 [Google Scholar]
48. Rydgren, J., and S. van der Meiden
    2019 “The Radical Right and the End of Swedish Exceptionalism.” European Political Science18 (3):439–455. 10.1057/s41304‑018‑0159‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0159-6 [Google Scholar]
49. Serafis, D.
    2022 Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts: A critical framework. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 6 (2), 261–288. 10.1558/jld.22363
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.22363 [Google Scholar]
50. Serafis, D.
    2023 Authoritarianism on the front page: Multimodal discourse and argumentation in times of multiple crises in Greece. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.99
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.99 [Google Scholar]
51. Serafis, D. & Assimakopoulos, S.
    2023 ‘Let’s send them to desert islands’: Right-wing populist argumentation and hatred against migrants in Greece. InB. Hamre and L. Villadsen (Eds.), Islands and desolated places as cases of extreme exclusion, 83–103. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004688520_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004688520_005 [Google Scholar]
52. Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. & Jermini-Martinez Soria, C.
    2020a Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: Evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies, 17 (5), 545–565. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1701509
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1701509 [Google Scholar]
53. Serafis, D., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C. & Jermini-Martinez Soria, C.
    2020b Multimodal arguments in the mainstream press: Illustrating portrayals of migration. InCook, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol.121 (pp.1–14). Ontario: University of Windsor.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Serafis, D., Raimondo, C., Assimakopoulos, S., Greco, S. & Rocci, A.
    2021 Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: Evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis’. Discourse & Communication, 15 (5), 559–581. 10.1177/17504813211017706
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211017706 [Google Scholar]
55. Serafis, D. & Tseronis, A.
    2023 The front page as a canvas for multimodal argumentation: Brexit in the Greek press. Frontiers in Communication81: 1230632. 10.3389/fcomm.2023.1230632
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1230632 [Google Scholar]
56. Serafis, D., Zappettini, F. & Assimakopoulos, S.
    2023 The institutionalization of hatred politics in the Mediterranean: Studying corpora of online news portals during the European ‘refugee crisis’. Topoi421, 651–670. 10.1007/s11245‑023‑09890‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09890-w [Google Scholar]
57. Soare, S., and C. D. Tufiș
    2023 “Saved by the Diaspora? The Case of the Alliance for the Union of Romanians.” European Political Science22 (1):101–118. 10.1057/s41304‑022‑00408‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00408-3 [Google Scholar]
58. Stavrakakis, Y., and G. Katsambekis
    2014 “Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA.” Journal of Political Ideologies19 (2):119–142. 10.1080/13569317.2014.909266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266 [Google Scholar]
59. Stavrakakis, Y.
    2017 “Extreme Right-wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association.” Critical Discourse Studies14 (4): 420–439. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325 [Google Scholar]
60. Sverigedemokraterna
    Sverigedemokraterna 2023 “Vad vi vill.” [This is what we want] https://sd.se/vad-vi-vill/ (last accessed: 2023-10-29).
61. Söderin, E.
    2022 SD-toppen styrde trollarmén – gav sig på unga under klimatdemonstration. [Member of parliament from the Sweden Democrats led a troll army – infiltrated a climate demonstration] Dagens ETC. https://www.etc.se/inrikes/sd-toppen-styrde-trollarmen-gav-sig-paa-unga-under-klimatdemonstration (last accessed: 29.10.2023).
62. Tseronis, A.
    2015 “Multimodal Argumentation in News Magazine Covers: A Case Study of Front Covers Putting Greece on the Spot of the European Economic Crisis.” Discourse, Context and Media71:18–27. 10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.003 [Google Scholar]
63. Tseronis, A.
    2018 “Multimodal Argumentation: Beyond the Verbal/Visual Divide.” Semiotica2201:41–67. 10.1515/sem‑2015‑0144
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0144 [Google Scholar]
64. Tseronis, A., and C. Forceville
    (eds) 2017 Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14 [Google Scholar]
65. Tseronis, Assimakis, Ramy Younis, and Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
    2024 “A proposal for the evaluation of multimodal argumentation: Assessing reasonableness and effectiveness in environmental campaign posters.” Journal of Argumentation in Context13 (2):292–317.
    [Google Scholar]
66. van Dijk, T. A.
    2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byD. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, and H. Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
67. van Leeuwen, T.
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
68. Way, L. & Serafis, D.
    2023 “Scroll culture and authoritarian populism: How Turkish and Greek online news aggravate ‘refugee crisis’ tensions”. Critical Discourse Studies, 20(6), 643–664. 10.1080/17405904.2022.2156568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2156568 [Google Scholar]
69. Wodak, R., and M. Krzyżanowski
    (eds) 2017 “Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse Beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4):471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
70. Wodak, R.
    2021 The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781529739664
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664 [Google Scholar]
71. Wodak, R., and M. KhosraviNik
    (2013) “Dynamics of Discourse and Politics in Right-Wing Populism in Europe and Beyond: An Introduction.” InRight-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, ed. byR. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, and B. Mral, xvii–xxviii. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472544940
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472544940 [Google Scholar]