1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Japan has transformed itself from a militaristic, imperialist state into a pacifist, democratic country as well as a reliable U.S. ally. However, postwar Japan has had two responses to the lost war. On the one hand, conservatives often found it difficult to reconcile themselves with the reality of losing the last war. On the other hand, liberals found themselves at home in line with the Japanese postwar democracy based on the country’s embrace of the ideal. Taking into account the tension intrinsic to Japanese interpretations of the postwar Constitution, this study will explore the way in which Prime Minister Abe made confrontational strategic maneuvering in political argumentation. By doing so, it will explicate how Abe sought to identify the context in the way that one should view a reality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.16008.oku
2018-05-07
2019-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abe: Japan will never be drawn into U.S. war 2015, May21. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abe makes case for security legislation in Diet debate 2015, May27. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Abe: Mideast, Indian Ocean possible logistic support areas 2015, June3. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andone, C.
    2013Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aoki, M.
    May28 2015 Abe lays out scenarios for SDF dispatch if security bills pass. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blair, G.
    2015, September19. New era for Japan. The Christian Science Monitor.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabinet approves 2 security bills: Turning point for Japan’s defense policy. May15 2015The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai, H. and Zhang, Y.
    2014, August6. China stands firm against Japanese defense paper. The China Daily. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, J. H. and Gordon, M. R.
    2015, April28. U.S. and Japan tighten military cooperation. The New York Times, p.A13.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Diet debates security bills in detail 2015, May28. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Diet deliberations on security legislation focus on criteria 2015, June9. The Japan News, p.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dower, J. W.
    1999Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Editorial: Approval for limited exercise of right of collective self-defense constitutional. June7 2015The Japan News, p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Editorial: Diet should consider real threats in its discussion of security bills. June12 2015The Japan News, p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Editorial: Exclusively defense-oriented policy unchanged under new legislation. May31 2015The Japan News, p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fifield, A.
    2015, May24. Ally of Japan’s premier defends effort to amend constitution. The Washington Post, p.A22.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015, August14. “Japan’s leader stops short of WWI apology.” The Washington Post. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Friday, K.
    2006 Might makes right: Just war and just warfare in early Medieval Japan. In T. Brekke (Ed.), The ethics of war in Asian civilizations: A comparative perspective (pp.159–84). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fukuma, Y.
    2007Junkoku to hangyaku: “Tokko” no katari no sengoshi. Tokyo: Sekai Shisosha.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Funabashi, Y.
    2015, August13. Japan’s gray-haired pacifism. The New York Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Japan in depth: Abe avoids controversy in security bills debate 2015, May22. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Japan security debate masks differences on pacifist character constitution seen as a shoddy document 2015, July15. The Nation. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kameda, M.
    May15 2015 Abe says new security bills are not “war legislation.” The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kameda, M. and Yoshida, R.
    January1 2015 Year ahead may mark turning point for SDF. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Legislative reforms aim to remove geographical limit on SDF work 2015, June7. The Japan News, p.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Macagno, F. and Walton, D.
    2016Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McCurry, J.
    2015, September18. Japanese soldiers could fight abroad again after security bill passed. The Guardian. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mie, A.
    2014, June25. Abe offers concession on collective defense. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. More time won’t justify security bills 2015, June26. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mosse, G.
    1990Fallen soldiers: Reshaping the memory of the world wars. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. New security bills envision threats to Japanese people. May29 2015The Japan News, p.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. O’Brien, W.
    1981The conduct of just and limited war. New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Orend, B.
    2006The morality of war. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Parry, R. L.
    2015, September15. Japanese forces live in fear of their first battle since 1945. The Times (London), p.38.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2015, November30. From our correspondent: After 70 years of pacifism, Japan has given itself the power to go to war, but do its soldiers really want to fight?The Times (London), p.39.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pilling, D.
    2015, April23. An unsinkable Pacific alliance. The Financial Times. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ft.com/content/e32282d8-e8cf-11e4-87fe-00144feab7de
    [Google Scholar]
  37. SDF logistic support only possible when strict rules met, Abe says 2015, May29. The Japan News. p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Security bills raise critical questions. May23 2015The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Soble, J.
    2015, July17. Lower house in Japan acts to ease limits on military. The International New York Times, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stop dodging key security questions 2015, June18. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. van Eemeren, F. H.
    2010Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  42. van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P.
    2002 Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P. (Eds.). Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. (pp.131–159). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9948‑1_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_10 [Google Scholar]
  43. Walton, D.
    2005 Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and persuasive definitions. Argumentation19, pp.159–186. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑005‑2312‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2312-y [Google Scholar]
  44. Waltzer, M.
    1977Just and unjust war. 3rd ed.New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wrong way to pass security bills 2015, July17. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Yoshida, R.
    2015, June19. Supreme court unlikely to rule on Abe’s Article 9 revamp. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zarefsky, D.
    1997 Keynote address: Definitions. Klumpp, J. F. (Ed.). Argument in a time of change: Definitions, frameworks, and critiques. (pp.1–11). Annandale, VA.: National Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2006 Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: Implications for dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation 20, pp.399–416.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.16008.oku
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): constitution , Japan , Just War doctrine , Peace and Security Bills and Shinzo Abe
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error