Prime Minister Abe’s challenge to the Japanese Postwar Constitution

References

1. Abe: Japan will never be drawn into U.S. war 2015, May21. The Japan News, p.1.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abe makes case for security legislation in Diet debate 2015, May27. The Japan News, p.1.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Abe: Mideast, Indian Ocean possible logistic support areas 2015, June3. The Japan News, p.1.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Andone, C.
   2013 Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.5
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
5. Aoki, M.
   May28 2015 Abe lays out scenarios for SDF dispatch if security bills pass. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blair, G.
   2015, September19. New era for Japan. The Christian Science Monitor.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cabinet approves 2 security bills: Turning point for Japan’s defense policy. May15 2015 The Japan News, p.1.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cai, H. and Zhang, Y.
   2014, August6. China stands firm against Japanese defense paper. The China Daily. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Davis, J. H. and Gordon, M. R.
   2015, April28. U.S. and Japan tighten military cooperation. The New York Times, p.A13.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Diet debates security bills in detail 2015, May28. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Diet deliberations on security legislation focus on criteria 2015, June9. The Japan News, p.2.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dower, J. W.
    1999 Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Editorial: Approval for limited exercise of right of collective self-defense constitutional. June7 2015 The Japan News, p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Editorial: Diet should consider real threats in its discussion of security bills. June12 2015 The Japan News, p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Editorial: Exclusively defense-oriented policy unchanged under new legislation. May31 2015 The Japan News, p.4.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fifield, A.
    2015, May24. Ally of Japan’s premier defends effort to amend constitution. The Washington Post, p.A22.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fifield, A.
    2015, August14. “Japan’s leader stops short of WWI apology.” The Washington Post. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Friday, K.
    2006 Might makes right: Just war and just warfare in early Medieval Japan. In T. Brekke (Ed.), The ethics of war in Asian civilizations: A comparative perspective (pp.159–84). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fukuma, Y.
    2007 Junkoku to hangyaku: “Tokko” no katari no sengoshi. Tokyo: Sekai Shisosha.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Funabashi, Y.
    2015, August13. Japan’s gray-haired pacifism. The New York Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Japan in depth: Abe avoids controversy in security bills debate 2015, May22. The Japan News, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Japan security debate masks differences on pacifist character constitution seen as a shoddy document 2015, July15. The Nation. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kameda, M.
    May15 2015 Abe says new security bills are not “war legislation.” The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kameda, M. and Yoshida, R.
    January1 2015 Year ahead may mark turning point for SDF. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Legislative reforms aim to remove geographical limit on SDF work 2015, June7. The Japan News, p.2.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Macagno, F. and Walton, D.
    2016 Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McCurry, J.
    2015, September18. Japanese soldiers could fight abroad again after security bill passed. The Guardian. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mie, A.
    2014, June25. Abe offers concession on collective defense. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
29. More time won’t justify security bills 2015, June26. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mosse, G.
    1990 Fallen soldiers: Reshaping the memory of the world wars. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. New security bills envision threats to Japanese people. May29 2015 The Japan News, p.2.
    [Google Scholar]
32. O’Brien, W.
    1981 The conduct of just and limited war. New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Orend, B.
    2006 The morality of war. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Parry, R. L.
    2015, September15. Japanese forces live in fear of their first battle since 1945. The Times (London), p.38.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Parry, R. L.
    2015, November30. From our correspondent: After 70 years of pacifism, Japan has given itself the power to go to war, but do its soldiers really want to fight?The Times (London), p.39.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pilling, D.
    2015, April23. An unsinkable Pacific alliance. The Financial Times. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ft.com/content/e32282d8-e8cf-11e4-87fe-00144feab7de
    [Google Scholar]
37. SDF logistic support only possible when strict rules met, Abe says 2015, May29. The Japan News. p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Security bills raise critical questions. May23 2015 The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Soble, J.
    2015, July17. Lower house in Japan acts to ease limits on military. The International New York Times, p.1.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Stop dodging key security questions 2015, June18. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
41. van Eemeren, F. H.
    2010 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
42. van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P.
    2002 Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P. (Eds.). Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis. (pp.131–159). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9948‑1_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_10 [Google Scholar]
43. Walton, D.
    2005 Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and persuasive definitions. Argumentation19, pp.159–186. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑005‑2312‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2312-y [Google Scholar]
44. Waltzer, M.
    1977 Just and unjust war. 3rd ed.New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wrong way to pass security bills 2015, July17. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Yoshida, R.
    2015, June19. Supreme court unlikely to rule on Abe’s Article 9 revamp. The Japan Times. Retrieved fromLexisNexis Academic database.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Zarefsky, D.
    1997 Keynote address: Definitions. Klumpp, J. F. (Ed.). Argument in a time of change: Definitions, frameworks, and critiques. (pp.1–11). Annandale, VA.: National Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zarefsky, D.
    2006 Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: Implications for dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation 20, pp.399–416.
    [Google Scholar]