Strategic maneuvering by persuasive definition in corporate crisis communication

References

1. Aberdein, A.
   2000 Persuasive Definition. In Tindale, C. W. , Hansen, H. V. and Sveda, E. (eds.). Argumentation at the Century’s Turn. OSSA (Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation) Proceedings.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Agerdal-Hjermind, A.
   2014 “Organizational blogging: A case study of a corporate weblog from an employee perspective.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal19(1): 34–51. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ‑09‑2012‑0066
   https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2012-0066 [Google Scholar]
3. Baxter, G. L. and Connolly, T. M.
   2013 “The ‘state of art’ of organizational blogging.” The Learning Organization20(2): 104–117. doi: 10.1108/09696471311303755
   https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471311303755 [Google Scholar]
4. Du Bois, J.
   2007 The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.). Stance-taking in Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 139–182. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
5. Goodman, M. , Romenti, S. , Murtarelli, G. and Valentini, C.
   2014 “Organisations’ conversations in social media: Applying dialogue strategies in times of crises.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal19(1): 10–33. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ‑05‑2012‑0041
   https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2012-0041 [Google Scholar]
6. Macagno, F. and Walton, D.
   2010 “What we hide in words: Emotive words and persuasive definitions.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 1997–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.003 [Google Scholar]
7. Onkila, T.
   2009 Environmental Rhetoric in Finnish Business: Environmental Values and stakeholder relations in the corporate argumentation of acceptable environmental management. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Palmieri, R.
   2014 Corporate Argumentation in Takeover Bids. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aic.8
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.8
9. Romenti, S. Murtarelli , and Valentini, C.
   2014 “Organisations’ conversations in social media: applying dialogue strategies in times of crises.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal19(1): 10–33. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ‑05‑2012‑0041
   https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-05-2012-0041 [Google Scholar]
10. Stevenson, C.
    1944 Ethics and Language. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. van Eemeren, F.
    2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
12. van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R.
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. van Eemeren, F. , Grootendorst, G. and Snoeck Henkemans, F.
    2002 Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
14. van Eemeren, F. and Snoeck Henkemans, A.
    2017 Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation (second edition). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Walton, D.
    2005 “Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions.” Argumentation19: 159–86. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑005‑2312‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-2312-y [Google Scholar]