1887
Volume 6, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Zhiwen Yang. 2013. Normative research on specific method of legal argumentation, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/jaic.17023.xu-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.17023.xu
2017-12-04
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarnio, A.
    1987The rational as reasonable. A treatise on legal justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Feteris, E. T.
    1999Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9219‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Eemeren, F. H.van and Grootendorst, R.
    2003 A pragma-dialectical procedure for a critical discussion. Argumentation, 17: 365–386. doi: 10.1023/A:1026334218681
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026334218681 [Google Scholar]
  4. 1992Argumentation,communication,and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical approach. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kamlah, W. and Lorenzen, P.
    1967Logische Propadeutik. Vorschule des vernunftigen Redens (2nd improved and enlarged edition). Mannheim: Biblioraphisches Institue.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MacCormick, N.
    2005Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. A theory of legal reasoning. NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.17023.xu
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error