1887
Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews The maneuvering Paul: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Paul’s argumentation in First Corinthians 4:18–7:40

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.18002.hie
2020-01-24
2020-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eriksson, A.
    1998 Traditions as Rhetorical Proof – Pauline Argumentation in 1 Corinthians. Coniectanea Biblica, NewTestament Series, 29. Diss.Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
  2. Hietanen, M.
    2007Paul’s Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. Library of New Testament Studies, 344. London: T&T Clark.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Perelman, Ch. , and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1971The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver . University of Notre Dame Press, 120; Notre Dame & London: University of Notre Dame Press. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑1713‑8_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1713-8_8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Siegert, F.
    1985Argumentation bei Paulus. Gezeigt an Röm 9–11. Tübingen: Mohr.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Thurén, L.
    1995Argument and Theology in 1 Peter – The Origins of Christian Paraenesis. Journal of the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series, 114. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in their Rhetorical Context. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. 10.2307/j.ctt9m0vdv
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9m0vdv [Google Scholar]
  7. Toulmin, S.
    1990The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.18002.hie
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error