Rhetorical imaginings and multimodal arguments at the European Green Belt

References

1. Blair, Carole, Dickinson, Greg, and Brian L. Ott
   2010 “Introduction: Rhetoric/memory/place.” InPlaces of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials, ed. byGreg Dickinson, Carole Blair, and Brian Ott, 1–56. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bloomfield, Emma Frances, and Angeline Sangalang
   2014 “Juxtaposition as Visual Argument: Health Rhetoric in Super Size Me and Fat Head.” Argumentation and Advocacy50: 141–156. 10.1080/00028533.2014.11821815
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2014.11821815 [Google Scholar]
3. Brummett, Barry
   1981 “Burkean Scapegoating, Mortification, and Transcendence in Presidential Campaign Rhetoric.” Central States Speech Journal32(4): 254–264. 10.1080/10510978109368104
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978109368104 [Google Scholar]
4. BUND
   BUND 2017, August9. Traces of the past along the German Green Belt [PDF file]. BUND. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bund.net/service/publikationen/detail/publication/traces-of-the-past-along-the-german-green-belt/publication-topic/gruenes-band/
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burke, Kenneth
   1966 Language as Symbolic Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burke, Kenneth
   1968 Counter-Statement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Burke, Kenneth
   1969a A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Burke, Kenneth
   1969b A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Burke, Kenneth
   1970 The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Burke, Kenneth
    1984 Attitudes Toward History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cagle, Lauren E., and Denise Tillery
    2017 “Tweeting the Anthropocene: #400ppm as Networked Event.” InScientific Communication: Practices, Theories, and Pedagogies, ed. byHan Yu and Kathryn M. Northcut, 131–148. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315160191‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160191-7 [Google Scholar]
12. Carson, Rachel
    [1962] 2002 Silent Spring (40th anniversary ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cronon, William
    1996 “The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong nature.” Environmental History1(1): 7–28. 10.2307/3985059
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059 [Google Scholar]
14. Conley, Donovan S., and Lawrence J. Mullen
    2008 “Righting the Commons in Red Rock Canyon.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies5(2): 180–199. 10.1080/14791420801989694
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420801989694 [Google Scholar]
15. Davies Boren, Zachary
    2015, June19. “Germany is turning 62 military bases into wildlife sanctuaries.” Independent. Retrieved fromwww.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germany-is-turning-62-military-bases-into-wildlife-sanctuaries-10332109.html
    [Google Scholar]
16. DeLuca, Kevin Michael
    1999 “Unruly Arguments: The Body Rhetoric of Earth First!, Act Up and Queer Nation.” Argumentation and Advocacy36: 9–21. 10.1080/00028533.1999.11951634
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1999.11951634 [Google Scholar]
17. Dunlap, Riley E., and Kent D. Van Liere
    1978 “The ‘New Environmental Paradigm.’” The Journal of Environmental Education9(4): 10–19. 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 [Google Scholar]
18. EuroNatur
    EuroNatur, n.d. “Green Belt Europe”. Retrieved fromhttps://www.euronatur.org/en/what-we-do/campaigns-and-initiatives/green-belt-europe/
19. EUROPARC Federation (ed)
    EUROPARC Federation (ed) 2010 “Following Nature's Design. Promoting Cross-Border Cooperation in Nature Conservation.” Stuttgart, Germany: Heidehof Stiftung. Retrieved fromhttps://www.europarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/brochure_TransParcNet_final_low_resolution.pdf
20. European Commission
    European Commission 2013, May5. “Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital.” European Commission. Retrieved fromeur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:d41348f2-01d5-4abe-b817-4c73e6f1b2df.0014.03/DOC_1&format=PDF
    [Google Scholar]
21. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017a “Borders Separate. Nature Unites!” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/initiative.html
    [Google Scholar]
22. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017b “European Green Belt.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/
    [Google Scholar]
23. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017c “From Deathzone to Lifeline.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/initiative/origin.html
    [Google Scholar]
24. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017d “Iron Curtain.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/iron-curtain.html
    [Google Scholar]
25. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017e “Route of the Green Belt.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/route.html
    [Google Scholar]
26. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017f “Backbone of Diversity.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/ecological-network.html
    [Google Scholar]
27. Foss, Sonja K.
    1984 “Women Priests in the Episcopal Church: A Cluster Analysis of Establishment Rhetoric.” Religious Communication Today7: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Geidezes, L. & Kreutz, M.
    2004 Green Belt Europe – Nature knows no boundaries. From Iron Curtain to Europe’s lifeline Urbani izziv, 15(2), 135–138. doi:  10.5379/urbani‑izziv‑en‑2004‑15‑02‑007
    https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2004-15-02-007 [Google Scholar]
29. Gilbert, Michael A.
    1994 “Multi-Modal Argumentation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences24(2): 159–177. 10.1177/004839319402400202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319402400202 [Google Scholar]
30. Groarke, Leo
    2015 “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?” Argumentation29(2): 133–155. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑014‑9336‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0 [Google Scholar]
31. Groarke, Leo, Palczewski, Catherine H., and David Godden
    “Navigating the Visual Turn in Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy52: 217–235. 10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871 [Google Scholar]
32. Iron Curtain Trail
    Iron Curtain Trail 2014, August27. “Iron Curtain Becomes 7,000-Kilometer Bike Trail.” Iron Curtain Trail. Retrieved fromwww.ironcurtaintrail.eu/en/ict_realisieren/realisierte_abschnitte/6663040.html
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jamieson, Kathleen H.
    1980 “The Metaphoric Cluster in the Rhetoric of Pope Paul VI and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.” Quarterly Journal of Speech66(1): 51–72. doi:  10.1080/00335638009383502
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383502 [Google Scholar]
34. Kentigern Siewers, Alfred
    (eds.) 2014 Re-Imagining Nature: Environmental Humanities and Ecosemiotics. Lanham, MD: Bucknell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kjeldsen, Jens E.
    2015a “The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.” Argumentation29(2): 197–215. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑014‑9342‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9342-2 [Google Scholar]
36. Kjeldsen, Jens E.
    2015b “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation29(2): 115–132. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑015‑9348‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4 [Google Scholar]
37. McGeough, Ryan E., Catherine H. Palczewski, and Randall A. Lake
    2015 “Oppositional Memory Practices: U.S. Memorial Spaces as Arguments over Public Memory.” Argumentation and Advocacy51: 231–254. 10.1080/00028533.2015.11821852
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821852 [Google Scholar]
38. Milstein, Tema
    2011 “Nature Identification: The Power of Pointing and Naming.” Environmental Communication5: 3–24. 10.1080/17524032.2010.535836
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.535836 [Google Scholar]
39. Olson, Kathryn M. and G. Thomas Goodnight
    1994 Entanglements of Consumption; Cruelty, Privacy, and Fashion: The Social Controversy over Fur. The Quarterly Journal of Speech80(3): 249–276. 10.1080/00335639409384072
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639409384072 [Google Scholar]
40. Pasvik Inari Trilateral Park
    Pasvik Inari Trilateral Park 2007 Pasvik-Inari: Nature and History Shared [PDF file]. Oulu, Finland: Kalevaprint. Retrieved fromhttps://prosjekt.fylkesmannen.no/Documents/Pasvik%20-%20Inari/Dokument/InariPasvik_EN_web.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
41. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    [1969] 1971 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Pinto, Robert C.
    2001 Argument, inference and dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑0783‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0783-1 [Google Scholar]
43. Plumwood, Val
    1993 Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Point Alpha Foundation
    Point Alpha Foundation. n.d.a.. “The Point Alpha Memorial.” Point Alpha Foundation. Retrieved frompointalpha.com/en/point-alpha-memorial
    [Google Scholar]
45. Point Alpha Foundation
    Point Alpha Foundation. n.d.b.. “Path of Hope (‘Weg der Hoffnug’).” Point Alpha Foundation. Retrieved frompointalpha.com/en/path-hope-weg-der-hoffnung
    [Google Scholar]
46. Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania
    Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania. n.d.. “Balkan Green Belt.” PPNEA. Retrieved fromppnea.org/news/balkan_green_belt_.html
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rickards, Lauren A.
    2015 “Metaphor and the Anthropocene: Presenting Humans as a Geological Force.” Geographical Research53(3): 280–287. 10.1111/1745‑5871.12128
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12128 [Google Scholar]
48. Senda-Cook, Samantha
    2013 “Materializing Tensions: How Maps and Trails Mediate Nature.” Environmental Communication7(3): 355–371. 10.1080/17524032.2013.792854
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.792854 [Google Scholar]
49. Sepp, Kalev
    2011 The Estonian Green Belt. Tallinn: The Estonian University of Life Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sharer, Wendy
    1999 “Disintegrating Bodies of Knowledge: Historical Material and Revisionary Histories of Rhetoric.” InRhetorical Bodies, ed. byJack Selzer and Sharon Crowley, 120–142. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wells, Justine, McGreavy, Bridie, Senda-Cook, Samantha, & McHendry, George F.
    (2018) Introduction: Rhetoric’s ecologies. InBridie McGreavy, Justine Wells, George F. McHendry, & Samantha Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing Rhetoric and Material Life (pp.1–36). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑65711‑0_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65711-0_14 [Google Scholar]
52. Willis, Emma
    2014 Theatricality, Dark Tourism, and Ethical Spectatorship: Absent Others. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137322654
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322654 [Google Scholar]
53. Zappen, James P.
    2009 “Kenneth Burke on Dialectical-Rhetorical Transcendence.” Philosophy & Rhetoric42(3): 279–301. 10.1353/par.0.0039
    https://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0039 [Google Scholar]