Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



We analyze the visual, verbal, and material arguments present at the European Green Belt (EGB), a contemporary conservation project built from the former Iron Curtain. The EGB presents itself as a “living memorial” that fuses together former warring countries and thus makes an argument for the unity of Europe. To analyze this incredibly diverse and rhetorically significant project, we put the digital representations of the site and the discourse around the EGB into conversation with situated, rhetorical criticism performed along the EGB site itself. We analyze the EGB’s different argumentative juxtapositions regarding history and memory, nonhuman nature and technology, peace and war, memorial and tourism, and preservation and restoration. Overall, we find that the transformation of the Iron Curtain from divisive border into a European-wide, transboundary biodiversity conservation project uses transcendence as a key argumentative structure, which has implications for how we understand the human relationship with the environment, history, and memory


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Blair, Carole, Dickinson, Greg, and Brian L. Ott
    2010 “Introduction: Rhetoric/memory/place.” InPlaces of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials, ed. byGreg Dickinson, Carole Blair, and Brian Ott, 1–56. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloomfield, Emma Frances, and Angeline Sangalang
    2014 “Juxtaposition as Visual Argument: Health Rhetoric in Super Size Me and Fat Head.” Argumentation and Advocacy50: 141–156. 10.1080/00028533.2014.11821815
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2014.11821815 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brummett, Barry
    1981 “Burkean Scapegoating, Mortification, and Transcendence in Presidential Campaign Rhetoric.” Central States Speech Journal32(4): 254–264. 10.1080/10510978109368104
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978109368104 [Google Scholar]
  4. BUND
    BUND 2017, August9. Traces of the past along the German Green Belt [PDF file]. BUND. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bund.net/service/publikationen/detail/publication/traces-of-the-past-along-the-german-green-belt/publication-topic/gruenes-band/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke, Kenneth
    1966Language as Symbolic Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1968Counter-Statement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1969aA Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1969bA Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1970The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1984Attitudes Toward History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cagle, Lauren E., and Denise Tillery
    2017 “Tweeting the Anthropocene: #400ppm as Networked Event.” InScientific Communication: Practices, Theories, and Pedagogies, ed. byHan Yu and Kathryn M. Northcut, 131–148. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315160191‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315160191-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carson, Rachel
    [1962] 2002Silent Spring (40th anniversary ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cronon, William
    1996 “The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong nature.” Environmental History1(1): 7–28. 10.2307/3985059
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059 [Google Scholar]
  14. Conley, Donovan S., and Lawrence J. Mullen
    2008 “Righting the Commons in Red Rock Canyon.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies5(2): 180–199. 10.1080/14791420801989694
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420801989694 [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies Boren, Zachary
    2015, June19. “Germany is turning 62 military bases into wildlife sanctuaries.” Independent. Retrieved fromwww.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germany-is-turning-62-military-bases-into-wildlife-sanctuaries-10332109.html
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DeLuca, Kevin Michael
    1999 “Unruly Arguments: The Body Rhetoric of Earth First!, Act Up and Queer Nation.” Argumentation and Advocacy36: 9–21. 10.1080/00028533.1999.11951634
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1999.11951634 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dunlap, Riley E., and Kent D. Van Liere
    1978 “The ‘New Environmental Paradigm.’” The Journal of Environmental Education9(4): 10–19. 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 [Google Scholar]
  18. EuroNatur
  19. EUROPARC Federation (ed)
    EUROPARC Federation (ed) 2010 “Following Nature's Design. Promoting Cross-Border Cooperation in Nature Conservation.” Stuttgart, Germany: Heidehof Stiftung. Retrieved fromhttps://www.europarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/brochure_TransParcNet_final_low_resolution.pdf
  20. European Commission
    European Commission 2013, May5. “Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital.” European Commission. Retrieved fromeur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:d41348f2-01d5-4abe-b817-4c73e6f1b2df.0014.03/DOC_1&format=PDF
    [Google Scholar]
  21. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017a “Borders Separate. Nature Unites!” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/initiative.html
    [Google Scholar]
  22. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017b “European Green Belt.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  23. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017c “From Deathzone to Lifeline.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/initiative/origin.html
    [Google Scholar]
  24. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017d “Iron Curtain.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/iron-curtain.html
    [Google Scholar]
  25. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017e “Route of the Green Belt.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/route.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. European Green Belt
    European Green Belt 2017f “Backbone of Diversity.” European Green Belt. Retrieved fromwww.europeangreenbelt.org/ecological-network.html
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Foss, Sonja K.
    1984 “Women Priests in the Episcopal Church: A Cluster Analysis of Establishment Rhetoric.” Religious Communication Today7: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Geidezes, L. & Kreutz, M.
    2004 Green Belt Europe – Nature knows no boundaries. From Iron Curtain to Europe’s lifeline Urbani izziv, 15(2), 135–138. doi:  10.5379/urbani‑izziv‑en‑2004‑15‑02‑007
    https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2004-15-02-007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gilbert, Michael A.
    1994 “Multi-Modal Argumentation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences24(2): 159–177. 10.1177/004839319402400202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319402400202 [Google Scholar]
  30. Groarke, Leo
    2015 “Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does it Matter?” Argumentation29(2): 133–155. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑014‑9336‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0 [Google Scholar]
  31. Groarke, Leo, Palczewski, Catherine H., and David Godden
    “Navigating the Visual Turn in Argument.” Argumentation and Advocacy52: 217–235. 10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2016.11821871 [Google Scholar]
  32. Iron Curtain Trail
    Iron Curtain Trail 2014, August27. “Iron Curtain Becomes 7,000-Kilometer Bike Trail.” Iron Curtain Trail. Retrieved fromwww.ironcurtaintrail.eu/en/ict_realisieren/realisierte_abschnitte/6663040.html
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jamieson, Kathleen H.
    1980 “The Metaphoric Cluster in the Rhetoric of Pope Paul VI and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.” Quarterly Journal of Speech66(1): 51–72. doi:  10.1080/00335638009383502
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383502 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kentigern Siewers, Alfred
    (eds.) 2014Re-Imagining Nature: Environmental Humanities and Ecosemiotics. Lanham, MD: Bucknell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kjeldsen, Jens E.
    2015a “The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient.” Argumentation29(2): 197–215. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑014‑9342‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9342-2 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2015b “The Study of Visual and Multimodal Argumentation.” Argumentation29(2): 115–132. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑015‑9348‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4 [Google Scholar]
  37. McGeough, Ryan E., Catherine H. Palczewski, and Randall A. Lake
    2015 “Oppositional Memory Practices: U.S. Memorial Spaces as Arguments over Public Memory.” Argumentation and Advocacy51: 231–254. 10.1080/00028533.2015.11821852
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821852 [Google Scholar]
  38. Milstein, Tema
    2011 “Nature Identification: The Power of Pointing and Naming.” Environmental Communication5: 3–24. 10.1080/17524032.2010.535836
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.535836 [Google Scholar]
  39. Olson, Kathryn M. and G. Thomas Goodnight
    1994 Entanglements of Consumption; Cruelty, Privacy, and Fashion: The Social Controversy over Fur. The Quarterly Journal of Speech80(3): 249–276. 10.1080/00335639409384072
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639409384072 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pasvik Inari Trilateral Park
    Pasvik Inari Trilateral Park 2007Pasvik-Inari: Nature and History Shared [PDF file]. Oulu, Finland: Kalevaprint. Retrieved fromhttps://prosjekt.fylkesmannen.no/Documents/Pasvik%20-%20Inari/Dokument/InariPasvik_EN_web.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    [1969] 1971The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pinto, Robert C.
    2001Argument, inference and dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑0783‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0783-1 [Google Scholar]
  43. Plumwood, Val
    1993Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Point Alpha Foundation
    Point Alpha Foundation. n.d.a.. “The Point Alpha Memorial.” Point Alpha Foundation. Retrieved frompointalpha.com/en/point-alpha-memorial
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Point Alpha Foundation
    Point Alpha Foundation. n.d.b.. “Path of Hope (‘Weg der Hoffnug’).” Point Alpha Foundation. Retrieved frompointalpha.com/en/path-hope-weg-der-hoffnung
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania
    Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania. n.d.. “Balkan Green Belt.” PPNEA. Retrieved fromppnea.org/news/balkan_green_belt_.html
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rickards, Lauren A.
    2015 “Metaphor and the Anthropocene: Presenting Humans as a Geological Force.” Geographical Research53(3): 280–287. 10.1111/1745‑5871.12128
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12128 [Google Scholar]
  48. Senda-Cook, Samantha
    2013 “Materializing Tensions: How Maps and Trails Mediate Nature.” Environmental Communication7(3): 355–371. 10.1080/17524032.2013.792854
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.792854 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sepp, Kalev
    2011The Estonian Green Belt. Tallinn: The Estonian University of Life Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sharer, Wendy
    1999 “Disintegrating Bodies of Knowledge: Historical Material and Revisionary Histories of Rhetoric.” InRhetorical Bodies, ed. byJack Selzer and Sharon Crowley, 120–142. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wells, Justine, McGreavy, Bridie, Senda-Cook, Samantha, & McHendry, George F.
    (2018) Introduction: Rhetoric’s ecologies. InBridie McGreavy, Justine Wells, George F. McHendry, & Samantha Senda-Cook (Eds.), Tracing Rhetoric and Material Life (pp.1–36). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑65711‑0_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65711-0_14 [Google Scholar]
  52. Willis, Emma
    2014Theatricality, Dark Tourism, and Ethical Spectatorship: Absent Others. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137322654
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137322654 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zappen, James P.
    2009 “Kenneth Burke on Dialectical-Rhetorical Transcendence.” Philosophy & Rhetoric42(3): 279–301. 10.1353/par.0.0039
    https://doi.org/10.1353/par.0.0039 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error