Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises

References

1. Dimitrov, Radoslav S.
   2016 The Paris Agreement on climate change: Behind closed doors. Global Environmental Politics16:3. doi: 10.1162?GLEP_a_00361
   https://doi.org/10.1162?GLEP_a_00361 [Google Scholar]
2. Van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst
   2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fairclough, Isabela
   2019 Deontic power and institutional contexts: The impact of institutional design on decision-making in the UK fracking debate. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp.136–171. doi: 10.1075/jaic.18014.fai
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18014.fai [Google Scholar]
4. Fairclough, Isabela, & Norman Fairclough
   2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fisher, Roger, William Ury, & Bruce Patton
   2011 Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In, 3rd ed.London: Random House.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goodwin, J.
   2019 Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp.40–64. 10.1075/jaic.18008.goo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18008.goo [Google Scholar]
7. Krabbe, Erik C. W.
   2002 Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool. InF. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp.153–167). Amsterdam/Newport News, VA: Sic Sat & Vale Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
   2016 Splitting a difference of opinion. InPatrick Bondy & Laura Benacquista (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21 2016 Windsor, ON: OSSA. (pp.1–19). Windsor, Ontario: OSSA.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
   2018a Splitting a difference of opinion: The shift to negotiation. Argumentation, 32(3), 329–350. Reworked part of van Laar & Krabbe 2016. 10.1007/s10503‑017‑9445‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9445-7 [Google Scholar]
10. Van Laar, Jan Albert, & Erik C. W. Krabbe
    2018b The role of argument in negotiation. Argumentation, 32, 549–567.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lewiński, Marcin, & Dima Mohammed
    2019 The 2015 Paris Climate Conference: Arguing for the fragile consensus in global multilateral diplomacy. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp.65–90. doi: 10.1075/jaic.18017.lew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18017.lew [Google Scholar]
12. Mohammed, Dima
    2018 Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time: Accusations of Inconsistency in Response to Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.15 [Google Scholar]
13. Republican Platform
    Republican Platform 2016 https://prod-static-ngop-pbl.s3.amazonaws.com/media/documents/DRAFT_12_FINAL%5B1%5D-ben_1468872234.pdf
14. Rodrigues, S., Lewiński, M., & Üzelgün, M. A.
    2019 Environmental manifestoes: Argumentative strategies in the Ecomodernist Manifesto. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), pp.12–39. 10.1075/jaic.18036.rod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18036.rod [Google Scholar]
15. UNFCCC
    UNFCCC 2017 Climate: Get the Big Picture. Retrieved, March 20, 2017from: bigpicture.unfccc.int/#content-the-paris-agreemen
    [Google Scholar]
16. Tweede Kamer [Dutch House of Commons]
    Tweede Kamer [Dutch House of Commons] 2017 Uitkomsten klimaattop Parijs [Results climate summit Paris]. In: Handelingen 2015 – 2016 [Proceedings, 2015 – 2016], number85, item 17, May19 2016 Retrieved onMarch 20 2017from: https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/h-tk-20152016-85-17
    [Google Scholar]
17. Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, & Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
18. Weinstock, Daniel
    2013 On the possibility of principled moral compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16(4): 537–556. 10.1080/13698230.2013.810392
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.810392 [Google Scholar]
19. Wendt, Fabian
    2016 Compromise, Peace and Public Justification: Political Morality Beyond Justice. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑28877‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28877-2 [Google Scholar]