The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters

References

1. Charles, Cathy , Amiram Gafni , and Tim Whelan
   1997 “Shared Decision-Making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean? (or It Takes at Least Two to Tango).” Social Science and Medicine44 (5):681–92. 10.1016/S0277‑9536(96)00221‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3 [Google Scholar]
2. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
   2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
3. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
   1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110846089
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
4. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
   2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
   2016 Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315401140
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315401140 [Google Scholar]
6. Elwyn, Glyn et al.
   2014 “Collaborative Deliberation: A Model for Patient Care.” Patient Education and Counseling97 (2):158–64. 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.027
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.027 [Google Scholar]
7. Epstein, Ronald M. and Richard L. Street
   2011 “Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness.” The Annals of Family Medicine9 (5):454–61. 10.1370/afm.1301
   https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1301 [Google Scholar]
8. Karnieli-Miller, Orit
   2006 “The Experiencing of Breaking and Receiving Bad News on Chronic Illness during Adolescence: An Insider’s Perspective of Adolescents, Parents and Physicians.” (doctoral dissertation) University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. (In Hebrew).
9. Karnieli-Miller, Orit and Zvi Eisikovits
   2009 “Physician as Partner or Salesman? Shared Decision-Making in Real-Time Encounters.” Social Science and Medicine69 (1):1–8. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.030
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.030 [Google Scholar]
10. Karnieli-Miller, Orit , Perla Werner , Judith Aharon-Peretz , and Shmuel Eidelman
    2007 “Dilemmas in the (un)veiling of the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Walking an Ethical and Professional Tight Rope.” Patient Education and Counseling67 (3):307–14. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.014 [Google Scholar]
11. Karnieli-Miller, Orit , Perla Werner , Galit Neufeld-Kroszynski , and Shmuel Eidelman
    2012 “Are You Talking to Me?! An Exploration of the Triadic Physician-Patient-Companion Communication within Memory Clinics Encounters.” Patient Education and Counseling88 (3):381–90. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.014 [Google Scholar]
12. Labrie, Nanon H. M. and Peter J. Schulz
    2015 “Exploring the Relationships between Participatory Decision-Making, Visit Duration, and General Practitioners’ Provision of Argumentation to Support Their Medical Advice: Results from a Content Analysis.” Patient Education and Counseling98 (5):572–77. 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.017 [Google Scholar]
13. Labrie, Nanon and Peter J. Schulz
    2014 “Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication.” Health Communication29 (10):996–1008. 10.1080/10410236.2013.829018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.829018 [Google Scholar]
14. Leplege, Alain et al.
    2007 “Person-Centredness: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Disability and Rehabilitation29 (20–21):1555–65. 10.1080/09638280701618661
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701618661 [Google Scholar]
15. Mead, Nicola and Peter Bower
    2000 “Patient-Centredness: A Conceptual Framework and Review of the Empirical Literature.” Social Science and Medicine51 (7):1087–1110. 10.1016/S0277‑9536(00)00098‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8 [Google Scholar]
16. Meitar, Dafna , Orit Karnieli-Miller , and Shmuel Eidelman
    2009 “The Impact of Senior Medical Students’ Personal Difficulties on Their Communication Patterns in Breaking Bad News.” Academic Medicine84 (11):1582–94. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2b94
    https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2b94 [Google Scholar]
17. Moustakas, Clark
    1994 Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781412995658
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658 [Google Scholar]
18. Rivera, Francisco Javier Uribe and Elizabeth Artmann
    2015 “Argumentação E Comunicação Médico-Paciente: Comparando Os Enfoques Da Pragma-Dialética de Toulmin E a Sociolinguística Americana.” Cadernos de Saúde Pública31 (12):2577–87. 10.1590/0102‑311X00150914
    https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00150914 [Google Scholar]
19. Rubinelli, Sara
    2013 “Rational versus Unreasonable Persuasion in Doctor–patient Communication : A Normative Account.” Patient Education and Counseling92 (3):296–301. 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.005 [Google Scholar]
20. Rubinelli, Sara and Peter J. Schulz
    2006 “‘Let Me Tell You Why!’. When Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Interaction Makes a Difference.” Argumentation20 (3):353–75. 10.1007/s10503‑006‑9014‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9014-y [Google Scholar]
21. Rubinelli, Sara and Claudia Zanini
    2012 “Teaching Argumentation Theory to Doctors: Why and What.” Journal of Argumentation in Context1 (1):66–80. 10.1075/jaic.1.1.06rub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.06rub [Google Scholar]
22. Salmon, Peter
    2015 “Argumentation and Persuasion in Patient-Centred Communication.” Patient Education and Counseling, 98 (5):543–44. 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.010 [Google Scholar]
23. Schulz, Peter J. and Sara Rubinelli
    2006 “Healthy Arguments for Literacy in Health.” Paper presented atthe AAAI Spring Symposium on Argumentation for Consumers of Healthcare, Palo Alto, CA, March 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Seawright, Jason and John Gerring
    2008 “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly61 (2):294–308. 10.1177/1065912907313077
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077 [Google Scholar]
25. Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin
    1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Tojek, Tina M. , Mark A. Lumley , Michelle Corlis , Steven Ondersma , and Vasundhara Tolia
    2002 “Maternal Correlates of Health Status in Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research52 (3):173–79. 10.1016/S0022‑3999(01)00291‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00291-4 [Google Scholar]
27. Wirtz, Veronika , Alan Cribb , and Nick Barber
    2006 “Patient–doctor Decision-Making about Treatment within the consultation – A Critical Analysis of Models.” Social Science and Medicine62 (1):116–24. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.017 [Google Scholar]
28. Zanini, Claudia A. and Sara Rubinelli
    2012 “Using Argumentation Theory to Identify the Challenges of Shared Decision-Making When the Doctor and the Patient Have a Difference of Opinion.” Journal of Public Health Research1 (2): 165–69. doi:  10.4081/jphr.2012.e26
    https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2012.e26 [Google Scholar]
29. Zanini, Claudia , Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini , Fabiola Atzeni , Manuela Di Franco , and Sara Rubinelli
    2015 “Building Bridges between Doctors and Patients: The Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Training Session in Argumentation for Chronic Pain Experts.” BMC Medical Education15:89. 10.1186/s12909‑015‑0374‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0374-6 [Google Scholar]