The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer

References

1. Charles, Cathy , Amiram Gafni , and Tim Whelan
   1997 “Shared Decision-Making in the Medical Encounter: What Does it Mean (or It Takes At Least Two to Tango).” Social Science and Medicine44 (5): 681–692. 10.1016/S0277‑9536(96)00221‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3 [Google Scholar]
2. Eemeren, Frans H. van
   2016 “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation30 (1): 1–23. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
3. Eemeren, Frans H. van , and Rob Grootendorst
   1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eemeren, Frans H. van , Peter Houtlosser , and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans
   2005 Argumentatieve indicatoren in het Nederlands. Een pragma-dialectische studie. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, Frans H. van , and Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans
   2011 Argumentatie. Inleiding in het identificeren van meningsverschillen en het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. Groningen/Houten: Noordhoff Uitgevers.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Feteris, Eveline T.
   2017 Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht etc.: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1129‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4 [Google Scholar]
7. Geest, Ingeborg M. van der
   2015 Argumentatie voor een keuze. Een pragma-dialectische analyse van gemotiveerde keuzes in overheidsbesluiten over m.e.r.-plichtige projecten. Ablasserdam: Haveka
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hayes, A. F. , & Krippendorff, K.
   2007 Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89. 10.1080/19312450709336664
   https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664 [Google Scholar]
9. Henselmans, Inge , Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven , Jane van der Vloodt , Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes , and Ellen M. A. Smets
   2017 “Shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy: A qualitative observation of talk about patients’ preferences.” Palliative Medicine31 (7): 625–633. 10.1177/0269216316676010
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316676010 [Google Scholar]
10. Huth, Edward J.
    1994 ““in the Balance”: Weighing the Evidence.” Annals of Internal Medicine120 (10): 889. 10.7326/0003‑4819‑120‑10‑199405150‑00012
    https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-10-199405150-00012 [Google Scholar]
11. Labrie, Nanon H. M. , and Peter J. Schulz
    2015 “Quantifying Doctors’ Argumentation in General Practice Consultation Through Content Analysis: Measurement Development and Preliminary Results.” Argumentation29: 33–55. 10.1007/s10503‑014‑9331‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9331-5 [Google Scholar]
12. Labrie, Nanon H. M. , and Peter J. Schulz
    2013 “Does argumentation matter? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication.” Health Communication29 (10): 996–1008. 10.1080/10410236.2013.829018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.829018 [Google Scholar]
13. Neuendorf, Kimberly A.
    2002 The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Pilgram, Roosmaryn
    2015 A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Pilgram, Roosmaryn
    2009 “Argumentation in doctor-patient interaction: Medical consultation as a pragmadialectical communicative activity type.” Studies in Communication Sciences92: 153–169.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Prigerson, Holly G. , Yuhua Bao , Manish A. Shah , M. Elizabeth Paulk , Thomas W. LeBlanc , Bryan J. Schneider , Melissa M. Garrido , M. Carrington Reid , David A. Berlin , Kerin B. Adelson , Alfred I. Neugut , and Paul K. Maciejewski
    2015 Chemotherapy use, performance status, and quality of life at the end of life. JAMA Oncology1: 778–784. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2378
    https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2378 [Google Scholar]
17. Schellens, Peter J. , and Gerard Verhoeven
    1988 Argument en tegenargument. Een inleading in de analyse en beoordeling van betogende teksten. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A.
    2017 “Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements.” Journal of Argumentation in Context6 (1): 59–75.10.1075/jaic.6.1.04hen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.04hen [Google Scholar]
19. Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A. , and Dima Mohammed
    2012 “Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making.” Journal of Argumentation in Context1 (1): 19–32. 10.1075/jaic.1.1.03moh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.03moh [Google Scholar]
20. Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A. , and Jean H. M. Wagemans
    2012 “The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: Institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making.” InBetween scientists & citizens: proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, ed. by Jean Goodwin , 345–354. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Wierda, Renske M.
    2015 Experience-based authority argumentation in direct-to-consumer medical advertisements: An analytical and empirical study concerning the strategic anticipation of critical questions. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint.
    [Google Scholar]