Francesco Arcidiacono & Antonio Bova (2017). Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts

References

1. Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B.
   2009 Argumentative design. N. M. Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp.145–174). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98125‑3_6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_6 [Google Scholar]
2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D.
   2003 Arguig to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑0781‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7 [Google Scholar]
3. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
   2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   [Google Scholar]
4. van Eemeren, F. H.
   2010 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
5. van Eemeren, F. H., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Greco Morasso, S., Grossen, M., & Rigotti, E.
   2009 Argupolis, a doctoral program on argumentation practices in different communication contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 289–301.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Golder, C.
   1996 Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne et Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Greco Morasso, S.
   2011 Argumentation in dispute mediation. A reasonable way to solve conflict. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Compagny. 10.1075/aic.3
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.3 [Google Scholar]
8. Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
   2015 L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et psychosociales. InN. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp.39–82). Bern : Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kuhn, D.
   1991 The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350 [Google Scholar]
10. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W.
    2003 The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245–1260. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00605
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605 [Google Scholar]
11. Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J.
    2014 Does argumentation matter ? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication. Health Communication, 29(10), 996–1008. 10.1080/10410236.2013.829018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.829018 [Google Scholar]
12. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K.
    2007 Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203946657
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657 [Google Scholar]
13. Miserez-Caperos, C.
    2017 Étude de l’argumentation à visée cognitive dans des interactions entre adulte et enfants : un regard psychosocial sur le modèle pragma-dialectique. Thèse de Doctorat. Retrieved fromdoc.rero.ch/record/289108
    [Google Scholar]
14. Perret-Clermont, A. N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S., & Miserez-Caperos, C.
    2015 Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children. InF. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp.135–149). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.9.08per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.08per [Google Scholar]
15. Rigotti, E.
    2006 Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage. Argumentation, 20(4), 519–540. 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9034-2 [Google Scholar]
16. Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
    2006 Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S.
    2010 Comparing the Argumentum-Model of Topics with other contemporary approaches to argument schemes; the procedural and the material components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑010‑9190‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7 [Google Scholar]
18. Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M.
    2015 Sur l’adéquation des théories de l’argumentation aux sciences de l’apprentissage et les fondements d’une théorie de “l’argumentissage”. InN. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp.269–322). Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R.
    2001 The origins and nature of arguments: studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negociation. Discourse processes, 32(2–3), 113–133. doi:  10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02 [Google Scholar]
20. Tartas, V., & Simonneaux, L.
    2015 Argumentation et conceptualisation en astromonie en classe de CM2 (grade 5). InN. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp.135–164). Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]