1887
Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews Interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.18034.mis
2020-01-24
2020-09-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andriessen, J. E. B., & Schwarz, B.
    2009 Argumentative design. N. M. Mirza & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp.145–174). New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98125‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D.
    2003Arguig to learn: confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑0781‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0781-7 [Google Scholar]
  3. van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
    2004A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. van Eemeren, F. H.
    2010Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  5. van Eemeren, F. H., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Greco Morasso, S., Grossen, M., & Rigotti, E.
    2009 Argupolis, a doctoral program on argumentation practices in different communication contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 289–301.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Golder, C.
    1996Le développement des discours argumentatifs. Lausanne et Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Greco Morasso, S.
    2011Argumentation in dispute mediation. A reasonable way to solve conflict. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Compagny. 10.1075/aic.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N.
    2015 L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et psychosociales. InN. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp.39–82). Bern : Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuhn, D.
    1991The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W.
    2003 The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245–1260. 10.1111/1467‑8624.00605
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605 [Google Scholar]
  11. Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J.
    2014 Does argumentation matter ? A systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor-patient communication. Health Communication, 29(10), 996–1008. 10.1080/10410236.2013.829018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.829018 [Google Scholar]
  12. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K.
    2007Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203946657
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657 [Google Scholar]
  13. Miserez-Caperos, C.
    2017Étude de l’argumentation à visée cognitive dans des interactions entre adulte et enfants : un regard psychosocial sur le modèle pragma-dialectique. Thèse de Doctorat. Retrieved fromdoc.rero.ch/record/289108
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Perret-Clermont, A. N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S., & Miserez-Caperos, C.
    2015 Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children. InF. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp.135–149). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.9.08per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.08per [Google Scholar]
  15. Rigotti, E.
    2006 Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage. Argumentation, 20(4), 519–540. 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9034-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
    2006 Towards a definition of communication context. Foundations of an interdisciplinary approach to communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S.
    2010 Comparing the Argumentum-Model of Topics with other contemporary approaches to argument schemes; the procedural and the material components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512. doi:  10.1007/s10503‑010‑9190‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9190-7 [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M.
    2015 Sur l’adéquation des théories de l’argumentation aux sciences de l’apprentissage et les fondements d’une théorie de “l’argumentissage”. InN. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp.269–322). Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R.
    2001 The origins and nature of arguments: studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negociation. Discourse processes, 32(2–3), 113–133. doi:  10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02 [Google Scholar]
  20. Tartas, V., & Simonneaux, L.
    2015 Argumentation et conceptualisation en astromonie en classe de CM2 (grade 5). InN. Muller Mirza & C. Buty (Eds.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp.135–164). Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.18034.mis
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error