1887
Volume 9, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article is guided by the question: What are the argumentative functions of personal stories in public deliberations? Drawing on the analytical traditions of argumentation theory and discourse analysis, we analyzed three public forums on mental illness, where personal stories were used in a number of argumentative functions. Our analysis reveals that in a deliberative forum personal stories were used as negotiable arguments rather than as mere assertions of individual experience. Personal stories were primarily used as arguments by example to challenge the framing proposed by the moderator and to pitch problem definitions that participants considered most relevant. In this function, personal stories were alternatively engaged as inductive or abductive arguments by other forum participants. Additionally, personal stories were used to support solution proposals and to uphold social ideals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.19005.luk
2020-12-17
2021-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bex, Floris
    2013a “Abductive Argumentation with Stories.” ICAIL-2013 Workshop on Formal Aspects of Evidential Inference, Rome (Italy). (www.florisbex.com/papers/bexAbdArg.pdf, accessed on24.01.2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013b “Values as the Point of a Story.” InFrom Knowledge Representation to Argumentation in AI, Law and Policy Making. A Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon, ed. by Katie Atkinson , Henry Prakken , and Adam Wyner . 63–78. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bex, Floris , and Trevor Bench-Capon
    2017 “Arguing with Stories.” InNarration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos . 31–45. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56883‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Black, Laura
    2008 “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments.” Communication Theory18: 93–116. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2007.00315.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 “Listening to the City: Difference, Identity, and Storytelling in Online Deliberative Groups.” Journal of Public Deliberation5 (1): article 4. (available at: www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol5/iss1/art4).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013 “Framing Democracy and Conflict through Storytelling in Deliberative Groups.” Journal of Public Deliberation9 (1): article 4. (available atwww.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art4/).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boswell, John
    2013 “Why and How Narratives Matter in Deliberative Systems.” Political Studies61: 620–636. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2012.00987.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00987.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatman, Seymour
    1978Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, Donald
    2014 “Narrative as Deliberative Argument.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways Toward Terrorism and Genocide7(1): 95–108. 10.1080/17467586.2014.915337
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2014.915337 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Isabela , and Norman Fairclough
    2012Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher, Walter
    1987Communication as Narration. Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fludernik, Monika
    1993The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Garssen, Bart
    2017 “The Role of the Argument by Example in Legislative Debates of the European Parliament.” Journal of Argumentation in Context6 (1): 27–43. 10.1075/jaic.6.1.02gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.02gar [Google Scholar]
  14. Govier, Trudy , and Lowell Ayers
    2012 “Logic and Parables: Do these Narratives Provide Arguments?” Informal Logic32 (2): 161–189. 10.22329/il.v32i2.3457
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3457 [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffiths, Morwena , and Gale Macleod
    2008 “Personal Narratives and Policy: Never the Twain?” Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain42 (1): 121–143. 10.1111/j.1467‑9752.2008.00632.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00632.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Ihnen, Constanza , and John Richards
    2011 “On Combining Pragma-Dialectics With Critical Discourse Analysis.” InKeeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris , Bart Garssen , and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans . 213–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.163.16ihn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.163.16ihn [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacobs, Scott , and Mark Aakhus
    2002 “What Mediators do with Words: Implementing three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Resolution.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly20 (2): 177–203. 10.1002/crq.3890200205
    https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890200205 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones, Michael
    2018 “Advancing the Narrative Policy Framework: The Musings of a Potentially Unreliable Narrator.” Policy Studies Journal46 (4): 724–746. 10.1111/psj.12296
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12296 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jones, Michael , Elizabeth Shanahan , and Mark MacBeth
    (eds) 2014The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones, Michael , and Mark McBeth
    2010 “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to be Wrong.” Policy Studies Journal38 (2): 329–352. 10.1111/j.1541‑0072.2010.00364.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Jonnes, Dennis
    1990The Matrix of Narrative: Family Systems and the Semiotics of Story. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KhosraviNik, Majed
    2010 “Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups.” Critical Discourse Studies7 (1): 55–72. 10.1080/17405900903453948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453948 [Google Scholar]
  23. Krzizanowski, Michal
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Labov, William
    1968Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1999Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Linde, Charlotte
    1993Life-stories: The Creation of Coherence. NY, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lukianova, Ekaterina , Igor Tolochin , Genevieve Fuji Johnson , and Katherine R. Knobloch
    2019 “Varieties and Effects of Emotional Content in Public Deliberation: A Comparative Analysis of Advocate Arguments at a Citizens’ Initiative Review.” Journal of Language and Politics (online first: doi:  10.1075/jlp.14013.luk).
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14013.luk [Google Scholar]
  28. Musolff, Andreas
    2016Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Publishing
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mustonen, Anne-Marie , Tommi Paakkonen , Esko Ryokas , and Petteri Nieminen
    2017 “Abortion Debates in Finland and the Republic of Ireland: Textual Analysis of Experiential Thinking and Argumentation in Parliamentary and Layperson Discussions.” Reproductive Health14: article 163. 10.1186/s12978‑017‑0418‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0418-y [Google Scholar]
  30. Olmos, Paula
    (ed) 2017Narration as Argument. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56883‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Phelan, James , and Peter Rabinowitz
    2012 “Time, Plot, Progression.” InNarrative Theory: Core Concepts and Critical Debates, ed. by David Herman , James Phelan , Peter Rabinowitz , Brian Richardson , and Robyn Warhol . Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Polletta, Francesca , and John Lee
    2006 “Is Telling Stories Good For Democracy? Rhetoric in Public Deliberation after 9/11.” American Sociological Review71: 699–723. 10.1177/000312240607100501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100501 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ryfe, David
    2006 “Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums.” Journal of Applied Communication Research34: 72–93. 10.1080/00909880500420226
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880500420226 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2007 “Toward a Sociology of Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation3 (1): article 3. (available atservices.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art3)
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sanders, Lynn
    1997 “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory25: 347–376. 10.1177/0090591797025003002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002 [Google Scholar]
  36. Somashekhar, Sandhya
    (2013, June3). “Obama Calls for National Conversation on Mental Health.” Washington Post.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Sprain, Leah , and Jessica Hughes
    2015 “A New Perspective of Stories in Public Deliberation: Analyzing Small Stories in Discussions about Immigration.” Text and Talk35 (4): 531–551. 10.1515/text‑2015‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0013 [Google Scholar]
  38. Steiner, Juergen , Maria Clara Jaramillo , Maia Rousiley , and Simona Mameli
    2017Deliberation across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316941591
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941591 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tindale, Christopher
    2017 “Narratives and the Concept of Argument.” InNarration as Argument, ed. by Paula Olmos . 11–30. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56883‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tracy, Karen
    2012 “Review: Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context1 (2): 253–258. 10.1075/jaic.1.2.06tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.2.06tra [Google Scholar]
  41. Toolan, Michael
    1988Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. Abington, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Turner, Mark
    1996The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Eemeren, Frans
    2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2013 “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse in Political Deliberation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context2 (1): 11–32. 10.1075/jaic.2.1.01eem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.1.01eem [Google Scholar]
  45. 2017 “Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns in Discourse.” Journal of Argumentation in Context6 (1): 3–26. 10.1075/jaic.6.1.01eem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.6.1.01eem [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Walton, Douglas
    2005Abductive Argumentation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2012 “Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy.” Informal Logic32 (2): 190–221. 10.22329/il.v32i2.3159
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3159 [Google Scholar]
  49. Walton, Douglas , Christopher Reed , and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
  50. Walton, Douglas , Katie Atkinson , Trevor Bench-Capon , Adam Wyner , and Dan Cartwright
    2010 “Argumentation in the Framework of Deliberation Dialogue.” InArguing Global Governance: Agency, Lifeworld and Shared Reasoning, ed. by Corneliu Bjola , and Markus Kornprobst . 210–230. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.19005.luk
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error