Deliberating over legislative ends

References

1. Albert, Hans
   1985 Treatise on Critical Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published in 1968) 10.1515/9781400854929
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400854929 [Google Scholar]
2. Atienza, Manuel
   1997 Contribución a una Teoría de la Legislación. Madrid: Civitas.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Atienza, Manuel
   2005 “Reasoning and Legislation.” InThe Theory and Practice of Legislation, ed. by Luc J. Wintgens . 297–317. Farnham: Ashgate.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Atkinson, Katie , and Trevor Bench-Capon
   2007 “Practical Reasoning as Presumptive Argumentation using Action Based Alternating Transition Systems.” Artificial Intelligence171: 855–874. 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009 [Google Scholar]
5. Blair, J. Anthony
   1998 “Walton’s Argument Schemes from Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development”. InProceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Ed. By Frans H. van Eemeren , J. Anthony Blair , Rob Grootendorst and Charles Willard . Retrieved from: rozenbergquarterly.com/issa-proceedings-1998-waltons-argumentation-schemes-for-presumptive-reasoning-a-critique-and-development/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bohman, James , and William Rehg
   2017 “Jürgen Habermas.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. By Edward N. Zalta . Retrieved fromhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/habermas/
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bratman, Michael
   1987 Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Bulygin, Eugenio
   1991 “Teoría y Técnica de la Legislación.” InAnálisis Lógico y Derecho [Logical Analysis and Law], ed. by Carlos E. Alchourrón , and Eugenio Bulygin . 409–415. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Feteris, Eveline
   2002 A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context. Argumentation16 (3): 349–367. 10.1023/A:1019999606665
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019999606665 [Google Scholar]
10. Freeman, James B.
    2013 “What types of arguments are there?”. OSSA Conference Archive. 50. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA10/papersandcommentaries/50
    [Google Scholar]
11. García Amado, J. Antonio
    1988 Teorías de la Tópica Jurídica. Madrid: Civitas.
    [Google Scholar]
12. García Amado, J. Antonio
    2000 “Razón Práctica y Teoría de la Legislación [Practical Reason and Theory of Legislation].” Derechos y Libertades: Revista del Instituto Bartolomé de las Casas9: 299–318.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Habermas, Jürgen
    2004 The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published in 1984).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Habermas, Jürgen
    1996 Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1992) 10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. Habermas, Jürgen
    2001 “On the Pragmatic, the Ethical, and the Moral Employment of Practical Reason.” InJustification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics, 1–17. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: MIT Press. (First MIT edition 1994).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Habermas, Jürgen
    1990 Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen (trans). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Originally published in 1983).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hastings, Arthur
    1963 A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
18. Historia de la Ley Nº 20.634
    Historia de la Ley Nº 20.634 2012 Otorga Beneficios a los Deudores del Crédito con Garantía Estatal y Modifica la Ley N° 20.027.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Karpen, Ulrich
    1986 “Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Gesetzgebungslehre in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [The current status of legislation in the Federal Republic of Germany].” Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung1: 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kelsen, Hans
    2007 General Theory of Law and State. New York: Clark. (Original work published in 1945).
    [Google Scholar]
21. Marcilla Córdoba, Gema
    2013 “Razón Práctica, Creación de normas y Principio Democrático: Una Reflexión sobre los Ámbitos de la Argumentación Legislativa [Practical Reason, the Creation of Norms and the Democratic Principle].” Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez47: 43–83.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Perelman, Chaim , and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    2000 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published in 1958).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pitkin, Hanna F.
    1967 The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California. 10.1525/9780520340503
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340503 [Google Scholar]
24. Schwartz, Shalom H.
    1992 “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25: 1–65.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Toulmin, Stephen
    2003) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. (original work published in 1958) 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005 [Google Scholar]
26. Van der Weide, Tom L. , Frank Dignum , John-Jules Ch. Meyer , Henry Prakken , and Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk
    2010 “Practical Reasoning Using Values: Giving Meaning to Values.” InProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ed. by Peter McBurney . 79–93. Budapest, Hungary. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑12805‑9_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_5 [Google Scholar]
27. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
28. Von Wright, Georg
    1972 On so-called practical inference. Acta Sociologica15: 39–53. 10.1177/000169937201500104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000169937201500104 [Google Scholar]
29. Walton, Douglas , and Erik C. W. Krabbe
    1995 Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts for Interpersonal Reasoning. NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Walton, Douglas
    1996 Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Walton, Douglas
    1999 Appeal to Popular Opinion. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Walton, Douglas
    2007 “Evaluating Practical Reasoning.” Synthese157: 197–240. 10.1007/s11229‑007‑9157‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9157-x [Google Scholar]
33. Walton, Douglas
    2013 Value-based Practical Reasoning, From Knowledge Representation to Argumentation. InAI, Law and Policy Making: a Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon, ed. by K. Atkinson , H. Prakken and A. Wyner . 259–282. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Walton, Douglas , and Chris Reed
    2002 “Argumentation Schemes and Defeasible Inferences.” Paper prsented at theWorkshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lyon.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Walton, Douglas , Chris Reed , and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
36. Wróblewski, Jerzy
    1979 “A Model of Rational Law-Making.” ARSPLXV (2): 187–201.
    [Google Scholar]