“Completely impartial opinion, okay?”

References

1. AristotleGeorge A. Kennedy
   Aristotle 1991 On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. Translated byGeorge A. Kennedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AristotleHugh Lawson-Tancred
   Aristotle 2004 The art of rhetoric [Rhetorica]. Translated byHugh Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Averbeck, Joshua
   2013 “Comparisons of Ironic and Sarcastic Arguments in Terms of Appropriateness and Effectiveness in Personal Relationships.” Argumentation and Advocacy50: 47–57. 10.1080/00028533.2013.11821809
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2013.11821809 [Google Scholar]
4. Banet-Weiser, Sarah
   2012 AuthenticTM: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. New York/London: New York University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beers Fägersten, Kristy
   2017 “The role of swearing in creating an online persona: The case of YouTuber PewDiePie.” Discourse, Context & Media18: 1–10. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar]
6. Boogaart, Ronny
   2013 “Strategische manoeuvres met sterke drank: Redelijk effectief?” InNeerlandistiek in beeld, ed. byTheo Janssen and Ton van Strien, 283–292. Amsterdam/Münster: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU/Nodus Publikationen.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boogaart, Ronny, Henrike Jansen and Maarten van Leeuwen
   2021 “‘Those are your words, not mine!’ Defence strategies for denying speaker commitment.” Argumentation35: 209–235. 10.1007/s10503‑020‑09521‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09521-3 [Google Scholar]
8. Chen, Chih-Ping
   2013 “Exploring personal branding on YouTube.” Journal of Internet Commerce12: 332–347. 10.1080/15332861.2013.859041
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2013.859041 [Google Scholar]
9. Chen, Chih-Ping
   2016 “Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube.” Journal of Consumer Culture16: 232–254. 10.1177/1469540514521081
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514521081 [Google Scholar]
10. Cocker, Hayley, and James Cronin
    2017 “Charismatic authority and the YouTuber: Unpacking the new cults of personality.” Marketing Theory17: 455–472. 10.1177/1470593117692022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117692022 [Google Scholar]
11. Cunningham, Stuart, and David Craig
    2017 “Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: Authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment.” Media International Australia164: 71–81. 10.1177/1329878X17709098
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17709098 [Google Scholar]
12. De Jans, Steffi, Veroline Cauberghe, and Liselot Hudders
    2018 “How and advertising disclosure alerts young adolescents to sponsored vlogs: The moderating role of a peer-based advertising literacy intervention through an informational vlog.” Journal of Advertising47: 309–325. 10.1080/00913367.2018.1539363
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2018.1539363 [Google Scholar]
13. Duffy, Brooke, and Jefferson Pooley
    2019 “Idols of promotion: The triumph of self-branding in an age of precarity.” Journal of Communication69: 26–48. 10.1093/joc/jqy063
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy063 [Google Scholar]
14. Duffy, Brooke, and Elizabeth Wissinger
    2017 “Mythologies of creative work in the social media age: Fun, free, and ‘just being me’.” International Journal of Communication11: 4652–4671.
    [Google Scholar]
15. van Eemeren, Frans
    2010 Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
16. van Eemeren, Frans
    2016 “Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation30: 1–23. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
17. van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst
    1984 Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
18. van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst
    1992 Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
    2002 “Strategic manoeuvring: Maintaining a delicate balance.” InDialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis, ed. byFrans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–160. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑9948‑1_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1_10 [Google Scholar]
21. van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    2002 Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410602442
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602442 [Google Scholar]
22. van Eemeren, Frans and Peter Houtlosser
    2005 “Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytical model of critical discussion and onventionalized types of argumentative activity.” InThe Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005, ed. byDavid Hitchcock and Daniel Farr, 75–84. Hamilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
    [Google Scholar]
23. van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser
    2006 “Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation.” Argumentation20: 381–392. 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9037‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9037-z [Google Scholar]
24. van Eemeren, Frans, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    2011 Argumentatie. 4th edition. Groningen/Houten: Noordhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
25. van Eemeren, Frans, and Peng Wu
    2017 Contextualizing pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12 [Google Scholar]
26. Ferchaud, Arienne, Jenna Grzeslo, Stephanie Orme, and Jared LaGrouge
    2018 “Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels.” Computers in Human Behavior80: 88–96. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041 [Google Scholar]
27. García Jiménez, Antonio, Beatriz Catalina García and María Cruz López de Ayala
    2016 “Adolescents and YouTube: Creation, participation and consumption.” Prisma Social1: 60–89.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gerhards, Claudia
    2017 “Product placement on YouTube: An explorative study on YouTube creators’ experiences with advertisers.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies23: 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hearn, Alison, and Stephanie Schoenhoff
    2016 “From celebrity to influencer: Tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream.” InA Companion to Celebrity, ed. byDavid Marshall and Sean Redmond, 194–212. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Horton, Donald and Richard Wohl
    1956 “Mass communication and para-social interaction.” Psychiatry19: 215–229. 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 [Google Scholar]
31. Hou, Mingyi
    2018 “Social media celebrity and the institutionalization of YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies24: 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Houtlosser, Peter
    2001 “Points of view.” InCrucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. byFrans van Eemeren, 27–48. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kjeldsen, Jens
    2015 “The study of visual and multimodal argumentation.” Argumentation29: 115–132. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9348‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9348-4 [Google Scholar]
34. Kjellberg, Felix [PewDiePie]
    2019 “I paid Belle Delphine $0 (she is happy) TikTok part 12.” YouTube. Retrieved fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uPD5q5BHR8. PublishedMarch 1, 2019; last accessedSeptember 14, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Koll-Stobbe, Amei
    1994 “Message merchants: Cognitive aspects of advertising cultural discourse.” Folia Linguistica28: 385–398. 10.1515/flin.1994.28.3‑4.385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1994.28.3-4.385 [Google Scholar]
36. Kress, Gunther
    2010 Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Labrecque, Lauren, Ereni Markos and George Milne
    2011 “Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and implications.” Journal of Interactive Marketing25: 37–50. 10.1016/j.intmar.2010.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.09.002 [Google Scholar]
38. Majdik, Zoltan, and William Keith
    2011 “Expertise as argument: Authority, democracy, and problem-solving.” Argumentation25: 371–384. 10.1007/s10503‑011‑9221‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9221-z [Google Scholar]
39. Marwick, Alice
    2015 “You may know me from YouTube: (micro-)celebrity in social media.” InA Companion to Celebrity, ed. by ed. byDavid Marshall and Sean Redmond, 333–350. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118475089.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475089.ch18 [Google Scholar]
40. Pilgram, Roosmaryn
    2012 “Reasonableness of a doctor’s argument by authority: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the specific soundness conditions.” Journal of Argumentation in Context1: 33–50. 10.1075/jaic.1.1.04pil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.04pil [Google Scholar]
41. Pilgram, Roosmaryn
    2015 A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. University of Amsterdam: PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
42. van Poppel, Lotte
    2009 “Institutionele invloed op het strategisch manoeuvreren in adviserende gezondheidsbrochures.” InStudies in Taalbeheersing 3, ed. byWilbert Spooren, Margreet Onrust and José Sanders, 309–322. Assen: Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Raun, Tobias
    2018 “Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies24: 99–113. 10.1177/1354856517736983
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736983 [Google Scholar]
44. Rihl, Alexander, and Claudia Wegener
    2017 “YouTube celebrities and parasocial interaction: Using feedback channels in mediatized relationships.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies23: 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tindale, Christopher, and James Gough
    1987 “The use of irony in argumentation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric20: 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Trilling, Lionel
    1971 Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge: Mass.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tseronis, Assimakis
    2018 “Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide.” Semiotica220: 41–67. 10.1515/sem‑2015‑0144
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0144 [Google Scholar]
48. Walton, Douglas
    1996a Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Walton, Douglas
    1996b Argument structure: A pragmatic theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781487574475
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487574475 [Google Scholar]
50. Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
51. Wierda, Renske, and Jacky Visser
    2017 “Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type.” InContextualizing pragma-dialectics, ed. byFrans van Eemeren and Peng Wu, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.12.05wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.05wie [Google Scholar]