The co-construction of campaign argumentation on U.S.A. late-night talk shows

References

1. Andone, Corina
   2013 Argumentation in Political Interviews. Analyzing and Evaluating Responses to Accusations of Inconsistency. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.5
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
2. Baum, Matthew A.
   2005 “Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit.” American Journal of Political Science49(2): 213–34. 10.1111/j.0092‑5853.2005.t01‑1‑00119.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.t01-1-00119.x [Google Scholar]
3. Baym, Geoffrey
   2013 “Transformations in Hybrid TV Talk: Extended Interviews on The Daily Show (.Com).” InMedia Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America, ed. byMats Ekström and Andrew Tolson, 63–86. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137273321_4
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273321_4 [Google Scholar]
4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
   1983 “The Dynamics of Political Interviews.” Text3(2): 131–53.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
   2002 The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
6. Collins, Sue
   2014 “Performing Ordinary : Politicians, Celebrity, & the Politics of Representation on Entertainment Talk.” The Popular Culture Studies Journal2(1&2): 109–39.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Craig, Robert T.
   2016 “Metacommunication.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, ed. byKlaus B. Jensen and Robert T. Craig, online. Routledge. doi:  10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect232
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect232 [Google Scholar]
8. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
   2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
9. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
   2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham, CH: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
10. Van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs
    1993 Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    2008 “Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves.” Journal of Pragmatics40(3): 475–93. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Tjark Kruiger
    2015 “Identifying Argumentation Schemes.” InReasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, ed. byFrans H. van Eemeren, 703–12. Cham, CH: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20955‑5_37
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_37 [Google Scholar]
13. Eriksson, Göran
    2010 “Politicians in Celebrity Talk Show Interviews: The Narrativization of Personal Experiences.” Text and Talk30(5): 529–51. 10.1515/text.2010.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.026 [Google Scholar]
14. Feldman, Lauren, and Dannagal Goldthwaite Young
    2008 “Late-Night Comedy as a Gateway to Traditional News: An Analysis of Time Trends in News Attention among Late-Night Comedy Viewers during the 2004 Presidential Primaries.” Political Communication25(4): 401–22. 10.1080/10584600802427013
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802427013 [Google Scholar]
15. Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock
    2002 “Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 727–47. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00027‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00027-9 [Google Scholar]
16. Fraser, Bruce, and Monica Malamud-Makowski
    1996 “English and Spanish Contrastive Discourse Markers.” Language Sciences18(3–4): 863–81. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(96)00052‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00052-6 [Google Scholar]
17. Garssen, Bart
    2017 “The Role of Pragmatic Problem-Solving Argumentation in Plenary Debate in the European Parliament.” InPrototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context, ed. byFrans H. van Eemeren, 31–51. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.03gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.03gar [Google Scholar]
18. Grimshaw, Eean, and Menno H. Reijven
    2021 “U.S. Presidential candidates’ use of the first-person plural on Entertainment-Political Interviews.” InFresh Perspectives on Major Issues in Pragmatics, ed. byMonika Kirner-Ludwig, pp.61–81. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jucker, Andreas H., and Sara W. Smith
    1998 “And People Just You Know like ‘Wow’. Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies.” InDiscourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. byAndreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv, 171–201. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.57.10juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.57.10juc [Google Scholar]
20. Labov, William, and David Fanshel
    1977 Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lauerbach, Gerda
    2007 “Argumentation in Political Talk Show Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics39(8): 1388–1419. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.004 [Google Scholar]
22. Loeb, Laura
    2015 “The Celebrity Talk Show: Norms and Practices.” Discourse, Context & Media10: 27–35. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.009 [Google Scholar]
23. Loeb, Laura
    2017 “Politicians on Celebrity Talk Shows.” Discourse, Context & Media20: 146–56. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.006 [Google Scholar]
24. Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
    2013 “The Late-Night TV Talk Show as a Strategic Genre in American Political Campaigning.” InAnalysing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. byPiotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 321–43. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.50.13mol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.13mol [Google Scholar]
25. Moy, Patricia, Michael A. Xenos, and Verena K. Hess
    2006 “Priming Effects of Late-Night Comedy.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research18(2): 198–210. 10.1093/ijpor/edh092
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh092 [Google Scholar]
26. Niven, David, Robert R. Lichter, and Daniel Amundson
    2003 “The Political Content of Late Night Comedy.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8(3): 118–33. 10.1177/1081180X03008003007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X03008003007 [Google Scholar]
27. Parkin, Michael
    2014 Talk Show Campaigns. Presidential Candidates on Daytime and Late Night Television. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203551752
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203551752 [Google Scholar]
28. Reijven, Menno H., Eean Grimshaw, and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
    2020 “‘That’s Not Funny!’ Identity and the organization of interaction on USA entertainment-political interviews.” Discourse, Context & Media35: 100386. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100386
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100386 [Google Scholar]
29. Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
    1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist70(6), 1075–1095. 10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
30. Schegloff, Emmanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner
    2009 “Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction42(2), 91–115. doi:  10.1080/08351810902864511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864511 [Google Scholar]
31. Sidnell, Jack
    2007 “`Look’-Prefaced Turns in First and Second Position: Launching, Interceding and Redirecting Action.” Discourse Studies9(3): 387–408. 10.1177/1461445607076204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607076204 [Google Scholar]
32. Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
    2001 “Argumentation, Explanation and Causality. An Exploration of Current Linguistic Approaches to Textual Relations.” InText Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. byTed J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren, 231–46. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.8.12hen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.12hen [Google Scholar]
33. Taniguchi, Masaki
    2011 “The Electoral Consequences of Candidate Appearances on Soft News Programs.” Political Communication28(1): 67–86. 10.1080/10584609.2010.540304
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.540304 [Google Scholar]
34. Weizman, Elda
    2008 Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.3 [Google Scholar]