1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Argumentative style is assumed to be instrumental to the implementation of an arguer’s strategic plan to resolve a difference of opinion in his/her favor. One important constitutive element of argumentative style are linguistic choices. It is therefore crucial to pay close and systematic attention to linguistic choices and their argumentative functions in the analysis of argumentative style.

In this paper we discuss how a linguistic-stylistic analysis can be conducted systematically by making use of methodological insights from the so-called “linguistic-stylistic approach”, and how such an analysis can be integrated with a pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative discourse. Our aim is to show how such an integration could be helpful in analysing the presentational aspect of an argumentative style, and how the outcomes of such an analysis could be linked to another aspect of argumentative style, namely the strategic considerations implemented in the argumentative discourse and more particularly the argumentative strategies involved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.20014.haa
2021-02-04
2021-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burgers, C. & de Graaf, A.
    (2013) Language intensity as a sensationalistic news feature: the influence of style on sensationalism perceptions and effects. Communications38: 167–188. 10.1515/commun‑2013‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0010 [Google Scholar]
  2. Fahnestock, J.
    (2009) Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. InExamining Argumentation in Context. Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, ed. F. H. van Eemeren (pp.191–220). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.1.12fah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.1.12fah [Google Scholar]
  3. Fahnestock, J. & Y. Tonnard
    (2011) Amplification in strategic maneuvering. InKeeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics, eds. E. Feteris , B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (pp.103–116). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.163.08fah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.163.08fah [Google Scholar]
  4. Langacker, R. W.
    (1990) Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110857733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  5. Leech, G. & Short, M.
    (2007) Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Second edition. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van Eemeren, F. H.
    (2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2018) Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2019) Argumentative style: a complex notion. Argumentation33: 153–171. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09478‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09478-y [Google Scholar]
  9. This issue. Examining Argumentative Style: A New Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P.
    (1999) Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies1: 479–497. 10.1177/1461445699001004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004005 [Google Scholar]
  11. van Eemeren, F. H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
    (2016) Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation (2nd rev. ed.) New York/London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315401140
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315401140 [Google Scholar]
  12. van Haaften, T.
    (2019) Argumentative strategies and stylistic devices. Informal Logic, 39, 301–328. 10.22329/il.v39i4.6037
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i4.6037 [Google Scholar]
  13. van Haaften, T. & van Leeuwen, M.
    (2018) Strategic Maneuvering with Presentational Devices: A Systematic Approach. InArgumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017, Volume II. Studies in Logic 76, eds. S. Oswald & D. Maillat (pp.873–886). London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. van Leeuwen, M.
    (2014) Systematic stylistic analysis. The use of a checklist. InFrom Text to Political Positions. Text analysis across disciplines, eds. B. Kaal , I. Maks & A. van Elfrinkhof (pp.225–244). Amsterdam [etc.]: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.55.11lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.11lee [Google Scholar]
  15. (2015) Stijl en politiek. Een taalkundig-stilistische benadering van Nederlandse parlementaire toespraken. [Style and politics. A linguistic-stylistic approach to Dutch parliamentary speeches] Dissertation Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stukker, N. & A. Verhagen
    (2019) Stijl, taal en tekst: stilistiek op taalkundige basis. [Style, language and text: stylistics on a linguistic foundation.] Leiden: Leiden University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.20014.haa
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error