Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article reviews The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts



Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andone, C.
    2013Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Eemeren, F. H. van
    2010Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017 Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. InF. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp.7–29). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.02van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.02van [Google Scholar]
  4. Garssen, B.
    2017 The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. InF. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp.31–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.03gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.03gar [Google Scholar]
  5. Garzone, G.
    2000 Textual analysis and interpreting research. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 10, 69–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Garzone, G., & Santulli, F.
    2004 What can corpus linguistics do for critical discourse analysis?InA. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. Collection Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication (pp.351–368). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marzocchi, C.
    1994 Interpretazione e argomentazione: alcune note preliminari per l’analisi dell’argomentazione nel discorso politico. InR. D. Snel Trampus (Ed.), Studi di neerlandistica. Traduzione, interpretazione, lingua (pp.63–72). Trieste: LINT.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1997 The analysis of argumentation and its relevance to interpretation research and theory. InK. Klaudy & J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre Necesse Est. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting, 5–7 September, 1996, Budapest, Hungary (pp.179–185). Budapest: Scholastica.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohammed, D.
    2018Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Accusations of inconsistency in response to criticism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.15 [Google Scholar]
  10. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
    2001Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Salvato, L.
    2019 The translator’s visibility. Translators’ critical argumentation on their translating effort. InGarrsen, B., (Eds.). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp.1022–1033). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams, M.
    2004Translation quality assessment: An argumentation-centred approach. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zarefsky, D.
    2014Political argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ziegelmueller, G. W., & Kay, J.
    1997Argumentation: Inquiry and advocacy, 3rd edition. Boston/London: Allyn and Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error