1887
Volume 10, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews The quest for argumentative equivalence. Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.20016.gre
2021-12-14
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andone, C.
    2013Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Eemeren, F. H. van
    2010Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017 Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. InF. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp.7–29). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.02van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.02van [Google Scholar]
  4. Garssen, B.
    2017 The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. InF. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp.31–51). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.03gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.03gar [Google Scholar]
  5. Garzone, G.
    2000 Textual analysis and interpreting research. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 10, 69–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Garzone, G., & Santulli, F.
    2004 What can corpus linguistics do for critical discourse analysis?InA. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. Collection Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication (pp.351–368). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marzocchi, C.
    1994 Interpretazione e argomentazione: alcune note preliminari per l’analisi dell’argomentazione nel discorso politico. InR. D. Snel Trampus (Ed.), Studi di neerlandistica. Traduzione, interpretazione, lingua (pp.63–72). Trieste: LINT.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1997 The analysis of argumentation and its relevance to interpretation research and theory. InK. Klaudy & J. Kohn (Eds.), Transferre Necesse Est. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting, 5–7 September, 1996, Budapest, Hungary (pp.179–185). Budapest: Scholastica.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohammed, D.
    2018Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Accusations of inconsistency in response to criticism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.15 [Google Scholar]
  10. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
    2001Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Salvato, L.
    2019 The translator’s visibility. Translators’ critical argumentation on their translating effort. InGarrsen, B., (Eds.). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp.1022–1033). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams, M.
    2004Translation quality assessment: An argumentation-centred approach. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zarefsky, D.
    2014Political argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ziegelmueller, G. W., & Kay, J.
    1997Argumentation: Inquiry and advocacy, 3rd edition. Boston/London: Allyn and Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.20016.gre
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error