The uncompromising confrontational argumentative style of the spokespersons’ replies at the regular press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs

References

1. van Eemeren, F. H.
   (2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
2. van Eemeren, F. H.
   (2019) Argumentative style: A complex notion. Argumentation33(2), 153–171. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09478‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09478-y [Google Scholar]
3. van Eemeren, F. H.
   (2021) Examining argumentative style: A new theoretical perspective. Journal of Argumentation in Context. 10(1). This issue. 10.1075/jaic.20022.eem
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20022.eem [Google Scholar]
4. Wu, P.
   (2017) Strategic maneuvering by personal attacks in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences: A pragma-dialectical study of the press conferences of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Journal of Argumentation in Context6(3), 285–314. 10.1075/jaic.17022.wu
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.17022.wu [Google Scholar]
5. Wu, P.
   (2019a) Confrontational maneuvering by dissociation in spokespersons argumentative replies at the press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation33(1), 1–22. 10.1007/s10503‑018‑09477‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-018-09477-5 [Google Scholar]
6. Wu, P.
   (2019b) “I have no comment”: Confrontational maneuvering by declaring a standpoint unallowed or indisputable at the press conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Argumentation33(4), 489–519. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09504‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09504-z [Google Scholar]