Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation

References

1. Aakhus, Mark
   2013 “Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication-information services.” Journal of Argumentation in Context2(1): 101–126. 10.1075/jaic.2.1.05aak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.1.05aak [Google Scholar]
2. Amossy, Ruth
   2009 “Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments.” Informal Logic29(3): 252–267. 10.22329/il.v29i3.2843
   https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i3.2843 [Google Scholar]
3. Amossy, Ruth
   2021 L’argumentation dans le discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bacqué, Marie-Hélène , and Mario Gauthier
   (2011) “Participation, urbanisme et études urbaines. Quatre décennies de débats et d’expériences depuis ‘A ladder of citizen participation’ de S.R. Arnstein.” Participations1: 36–66. 10.3917/parti.001.0036
   https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.001.0036 [Google Scholar]
5. Berger, Mathieu
   2014 “La participation sans le discours.” Espaces Temps.net, Travaux. www.espacestemps.net/articles/la-participation-sans-le-discours/
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blatrix, Cécile
   2002 “Devoir débattre. Les effets de l’institutionalisation de la participation sur les formes de l’action collective.” Politix15(57): 79–102. 10.3406/polix.2002.1208
   https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.2002.1208 [Google Scholar]
7. Blondiaux, Loïc , and Yves Sintomer
   2002 “L’impératif participatif.” Politix15(57): 17–35. 10.3406/polix.2002.1205
   https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.2002.1205 [Google Scholar]
8. Boy, Daniel , Dominique Donnet-Kamel , and Philippe Roqueplo
   2000 “Un exemple de démocratie participative: la ‘conférence de citoyens’ sur les organismes génétiquement modifiés.” Revue française de science politique50(4–5): 779–809. 10.3406/rfsp.2000.395508
   https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2000.395508 [Google Scholar]
9. Casillo, Ilaria
   2018 “La procedura di dibattito pubblico francese: una pratica ventennale di democrazia partecipativa sulle grandi opere.” InIl dibattito pubblico per infrastrutture utili, snelle e condivise Manuale di applicazione della nuova legge, ed. byFondazione ItaliaDecide, 13–24. Catanzaro: Rubettino Editore.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Casillo, Ilaria
    2020 “Il débat public francese: difesa dell’ambiente o difesa della democrazia? Una lettura critica dell’offerta istituzionale di democrazia partecipativa in Francia.” Istituzioni del federalismo, Rivista di studi giuridici e politici3: 635–656.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Castells, Manuel
    (1973) Luttes urbaines et pouvoirs politiques. Paris: Maspero.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dewey, John
    2010 Le Public et ses problèmes (Trans.). Paris: Gallimard. (Original work published in 1927).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Doury, Marianne and Marie-Cécile Lorenzo-Basson
    2012 “Les rôles d’expert et de citoyen dans un dispositif de démocratie participative: la conférence des citoyens sur les OGM (France, 1998).” InDiscours d’experts et d’expertise, ed. by Isabelle Léglise , and Nathalie Garric , 179–213. Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Doury, Marianne , and Christian Plantin
    2015 “Une approche langagière et interactionnelle de l’argumentation.” Argumentation et Analyse du Discours15. https://aad.revues.org/2006. 10.4000/aad.2006
    https://doi.org/10.4000/aad.2006 [Google Scholar]
15. Doury, Marianne , Matthieu Quet , and Assimakis Tseronis
    2015 “Le façonnage de la critique par les dispositifs. Le cas du débat sur les nanotechnologies.” Semen39: 39–58. 10.4000/semen.10472
    https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.10472 [Google Scholar]
16. Floridia, Antonio
    2012 La democrazia deliberative: teorie, processi, sistemi. Roma: Carocci Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gourgues, Guillaume , Sandrine Rui , and Sezin Topçu
    (eds.) 2013 Participations2. (“Critique de la participation et gouvernementalité.”)
    [Google Scholar]
18. Habermas, Jürgen
    1998 Raison et légitimité (Trans). Paris: Payot. (Original work published in 1973).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hirschman, Albert
    1970 Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jackson, Sally
    1998 “Disputation by design.” Argumentation12: 183–198. 10.1023/A:1007743830491
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007743830491 [Google Scholar]
21. Jacquin, Jérôme
    2014 Débattre. L’argumentation et l’identité au cœur d’une pratique verbale. Bruxelles: De Boeck. 10.3917/dbu.jacqu.2014.01
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.jacqu.2014.01 [Google Scholar]
22. Joss, Simon , and John Durant
    1995 “Introduction.” InPublic participation in science. The role of consensus conferences in Europe, ed. by Simon Joss , and John Durant , 9–13. Londres: Science Museum.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2017 Les débats de l’entre-deux-tours des élections présidentielles françaises. Constantes et évolutions d’un genre. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2019 Le débat Le Pen/Macron du 3 mai 2017: un débat “disruptif ?”Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lewiński, Marcin , and Dima Mohammed
    (eds) 2013 Journal of Argumentation in Context2(1).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Manin, Bernard
    1995 Principes du gouvernement representative. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates.” Journal of Pragmatics46: 39–68. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
28. Plantin, Christian
    2010 “Les instruments de structuration des séquences argumentatives.” Verbum32(1): 31–51.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rosanvallon, Pierre
    2006 La contre-démocratie, La politique à l’âge de la défiance. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rowe, Gene , and Lynn J. Frewer
    2000 “Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation.” Science, Technology and Human Values25: 3–29. 10.1177/016224390002500101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101 [Google Scholar]
31. Rowe, Gene , and Lynn J. Frewer
    2005 “A typology of public engagement mechanisms.” Science, Technology, and Human Values30: 251–290. 10.1177/0162243904271724
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724 [Google Scholar]
32. Spieker, Arne , and Marko Bachl
    2013 “Sonderfall statt prototype: eine prozedurale und empirische. Analyse der sclichtung zu Stuttgart 21.” InThe governance of large-scale project. Linking citizens and the State, ed. by Andrea Römmele , and Henrik Schober , 244–269. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 10.5771/9783845243566‑244
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845243566-244 [Google Scholar]
33. Weger, Harry Jr , and Mark Aakhus
    2003 “Arguing in Internet Chat Rooms: Argumentative Adaptations to Chat Room Design and Some Consequences For Public Deliberation At Distance.” Argumentation and Advocacy40:23–38. 10.1080/00028533.2003.11821595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2003.11821595 [Google Scholar]