1887
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Decades after the Second World War, fascism is still rife in Europe. After acknowledging a certain difficulty on the part of contemporary antifascist arguers to affirm their tenets and discredit those of their opponents, this investigation looks back at the past to examine an inspiring antifascist speech. The speech that socialist leader Giacomo Matteotti delivered to the Italian Parliament in 1924 is analysed though the methodological lens of Pragma-dialectics, focusing on the notions of strategic manoeuvring, argumentative structure and argumentative style. The results show that Matteotti’s argumentation against the fascists hinged on facts and rules as premises of argumentation. The speaker supported his arguments with factual evidence and organised them in a multiple argumentation structure. In addition, he “dressed up” his speech, apparently characterised by a detached argumentative style, with traits of a more engaged style, whose combination has turned Matteotti’s invective against the fascist regime into an argumentative masterpiece.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.21022.bra
2022-03-08
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ANPI
    ANPI 2021Appello del Presidente nazionale ANPI al Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri [Appeal of the ANPI National President to the Prime Minister of Italy]. Available at: https://www.anpi.it/articoli/2557/pagliarulo-presidente-draghi-e-ora-di-dare-un-segnale-su-durigon-ce-in-giro-sfiducia (last accessed on28th September 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bray, Mark
    2017Antifa. The Anti-fascist Handbook. Brooklyn/London: Melville House.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Canali, Mauro
    2014 “The Matteotti Murder, 1924–2014.” Printed Matter. Centro Primo Levi Online Monthly. Available at: https://primolevicenter.org/printed-matter/the-matteotti-murder-and-the-origins-of-mussolinis-totalitarian-fascist-regime-in-italy/ (last accessed on29th September 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carta di Stazzema [Stazzema Charter] 2017 Available at: https://anagrafeantifascista.it/ (last accessed on28th September 2021).
  5. Crystal, David
    2017Making Sense. The Glamorous Story of English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. de Búrca, Gráinne
    2018 “Is EU Supranational Governance a Challenge to Liberal Constitutionalism?” The University of Chicago Law Review85 (2): 337–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duggan, Christopher
    2013Fascist Voices. An Intimate History of Mussolini’s Italy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Encyclopedia Britannica, Giacomo Matteotti
    Encyclopedia Britannica, Giacomo Matteotti . Italian Political leader. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Giacomo-Matteotti (last accessed on28th September 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Feinstein, Stephen C.
    2000 “Art after Auschwitz. Jozef Szajna’s ‘Theatre of Panic’.” InThe Holocaust’s Ghost, ed. by F. C. Decoste , and Bernard Schwartz , 109–123. Alberta: The University of Alberta Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Finaldi, Giuseppe
    2013Mussolini and Italian Fascism. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. F.Q.
    F.Q. 2021 “Durigon finalmente fuori dal governo. Il sottosegretario si dimette 22 giorni dopo le parole sul ‘parco Mussolini’ [Durigon Finally Out of Government. The Undersecretary Resigns 22 Days After His Words on the ‘Mussolini Park’].” Il Fatto Quotidiano, 26thAugust 2021 Available at: https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2021/08/26/durigon-finalmente-fuori-dal-governo-il-sottosegretario-si-dimette-22-giorni-dopo-le-parole-sul-parco-mussolini-il-passo-indietro-dopo-lincontro-con-salvini-mi-scuso-mai-fascista/6302286/#cComments (last accessed on2nd October 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garssen, Bart
    2017 “The Role of Pragmatic Problem-solving Argumentation in Plenary Debate in the European Parliament.” InPrototypical Argumentative Patterns, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren , 31–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.11.03gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.03gar [Google Scholar]
  13. Garssen, Bart , and Manfred Kienpointner
    2011 “Figurative Analogy in Political Argumentation.” InKeeping in Touch with Pragma-dialectics, ed. by Eveline T. Feteris , Bart Garssen , and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans , 39–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.163.04gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.163.04gar [Google Scholar]
  14. Grasso, Giorgio
    2010Per una biografia politica di Giuseppe Lupis [For a Political Biography of Giuseppe Lupis]. Liber Iter edizioni elettroniche (e-book).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes-Hallett, Lucy
    2013 “My Hero: Giacomo Matteotti.” The Guardian, 8thNovember 2013 Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/nov/08/hero-giacomo-matteotti-lucy-hughes-hallett (last accessed on28th September 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lanfranco, Monica
    2018 “Antifascisti, non esiste violenza giusta. Il fascismo si nutre anche della rabbia di chi lo combatte [Antifascists, There Is No Just Violence. Fascism also Feeds on the Anger of Those Who Struggle against It].” Il Fatto Quotidiano, 23rdFebruary 2018 Available at: https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/02/23/antifascisti-non-esiste-violenza-giusta-il-fascismo-si-nutre-anche-della-rabbia-chi-lo-combatte/4180639/ (last accessed on20th September 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Milsark, Gary L.
    2015Existential Sentences in English. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Oxford Reference, Matteotti Crisis
    Oxford Reference, Matteotti Crisis . Available at: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100140543 (last accessed on28th September 2021).
  19. Raimo, Christian
    2019 “La lezione antifascista di Matteotti oggi è più utile che mai [Matteotti’s Antifascist Lesson Today is More Useful than Ever].” Internazionale, 15thJuly 2019 Available at: https://www.internazionale.it/reportage/christian-raimo/2019/07/15/giacomo-matteotti-antifascismo (last accessed on4th October 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016 “Identifying Argumentative Patterns: a Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-dialectics.” Argumentation30: 1–23. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
  22. 2019 “Argumentative Style: a Complex Notion.” Argumentation33: 153–171. 10.1007/s10503‑019‑09478‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09478-y [Google Scholar]
  23. 2021 “Examining Argumentative Style. A New Theoretical Perspective.” Journal of Argumentation in Context10 (1): 8–25. 10.1075/jaic.20022.eem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20022.eem [Google Scholar]
  24. van Eemeren, Frans H. , and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    2017Argumentation. Analysis and Evaluation. London/New York: Routledge (2nd edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Walton, Douglas
    2002Legal Argumentation and Evidence. University Park (PA): The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.21022.bra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.21022.bra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error