Argumentation tradition of traders in late antiquity

References

1. Apel, K.-O.
   Transformation der Philosophie. 21Bände Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1973.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Becker, T.
   The Pragmatics of Argumentation, [in:] A. C. Schalley (Ed.) Practical Theories and Empirical practice: A Linguistic Perspective. John Benjamins 2012, pp.257–272. 10.1075/hcp.40.10bec
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.40.10bec [Google Scholar]
3. Bermejo, L.
   Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory. Vol.201. Dordrecht: Springer 2011 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1761‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9 [Google Scholar]
4. Braudel, F.
   Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century. Vol. 3: The Perspective of the World. Oakland 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Casson, L.
   (Ed.) The Periplus Maris Erythraei. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1989.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chavannes, É.
   Les pays d’Occident d’après le Wei lio, T’oung pao61: 519–571 1905 10.1163/156853205X00348
   https://doi.org/10.1163/156853205X00348 [Google Scholar]
7. Cohoon, J. W., Crosby, H. L.
   (Trs.) Dio Chrysostom. Discourses 31–36. Loeb Classical Library 358. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1940.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Culbertson, L. E.
   Dispute Resolution in the Provincial Courts of the Third Dynasty of Ur. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan 2009.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De La Vaissière, É.
   Sogdian traders: a history Translated by J. Ward. Boston: Brill 2005 10.1163/9789047406990
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047406990 [Google Scholar]
10. Feteris, E. T.
    Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions. Second Edition. Springer 2017 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1129‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4 [Google Scholar]
11. Frank, A. G., Gills, B.
    The five thousand year world system: an interdisciplinary introduction, Humboldt Journal of Social Relations181: 1–79 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Frank, A. G., Gills, B.
    The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand?London 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Foucault, M.
    L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Éditions Gallimard 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Habermas, J.
    Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bde1–21. Baden-Baden 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Habermas, J.
    Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Neuwied 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Johnson, R. H., Blair, J. A.
    Logical Self-Defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kahane, H.
    Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric. The Use Of Reason in Everyday Life. Belmont, SA: Wadsworth 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kern, L. H., Mirels, H. L., and Hinshaw, V. G.
    Scientists’ understanding of propositional logic: An experimental investigation, Social Studies of Science13 (1): 131–146 1983 10.1177/030631283013001007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030631283013001007 [Google Scholar]
19. Lam, R.
    Kuṣāṇa Emperors and Indian Buddhism: Political, Economic and Cultural Factors Responsible for the Spread of Buddhism through Eurasia, South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies36(3): 434–448 2013 10.1080/00856401.2013.777497
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2013.777497 [Google Scholar]
20. Livshits, V. A.
    Sogdian epigraphy of Central Asia and Semirech’e. Tr. from the Russian byT. Stableford Ed. by N. Sims-Williams. London: School of Oriental and African Studies 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McCrindle, J. W.
    (Tr.) The Christian Topography of Cosmas, an Egyptian Monk. (Works issued by the Hakluyt Society 1, 98) 1897, repr.New York 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Moran, W. L.
    (Ed.) The Amarna letters. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 1992 10.56021/9780801842511
    https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801842511 [Google Scholar]
23. Neelis, J. E.
    Early Buddhist transmission and trade networks: mobility and exchange within and beyond the northwestern borderlands of South Asia. Leiden: Brill 2011 10.1163/ej.9789004181595.i‑372
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004181595.i-372 [Google Scholar]
24. Oswald, S., Greco, S., Pollaroli, C., Miecznikowski, J., Rocci, A.
    (Eds.) Argumentation and meaning: Semantic and pragmatic reflexions. John Benjamins 2020 10.1075/jaic.00005.osw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00005.osw [Google Scholar]
25. Perelman, Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
    Traité de l’argumentation : La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1958.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Porten, B.
    The Elephantine papyri in English: three millennia of cross cultural continuity and change. Leiden, New York, Koln: Brill 1996 10.1163/9789004669079
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004669079 [Google Scholar]
27. Rocci, A.
    Pragmatic inference and argumentation in intercultural communication, Intercultural Pragmatics3(4): 409–442 2006 10.1515/IP.2006.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2006.026 [Google Scholar]
28. Schumann, A.
    On the Origin of Indian Logic from the Viewpoint of the Pāli Canon, Logica Universalis131: 347–393 2019a 10.1007/s11787‑019‑00225‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00225-1 [Google Scholar]
29. Schumann, A.
    Did the Neo-Babylonians Construct a Symbolic Logic for Legal Proceedings?Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications6(1): 31–82 2019b.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Schumann, A.
    Legal argumentation in Mesopotamia since Ur III, Journal of Argumentation in Context, 9(2): 126–154 2020 10.1075/jaic.19015.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19015.sch [Google Scholar]
31. Schumann, A.
    Towards the Definition of Logical Competence, Cogency13 (2): 7–40 2021a 10.32995/cogency.v13i2.373
    https://doi.org/10.32995/cogency.v13i2.373 [Google Scholar]
32. Schumann, A.
    Nāgārjunian-Yogācārian Modal Logic versus Aristotelian Modal Logic, Journal of Indian Philosophy49(3): 467–498 2021b 10.1007/s10781‑021‑09470‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-021-09470-5 [Google Scholar]
33. Sims-Williams, N.
    Bactrian Documents from Northern Afghanistan I: Legal and Economic Documents. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sims-Williams, N.
    Bactrian Documents from Northern Afghanistan II: Letters and Buddhist Texts. London: Nour Foundation 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sims-Williams, N., de Blois, F.
    The Bactrian Calendar, Bulletin of the Asia Institute101: 149–165 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Strauch, I.
    (Ed.) Foreign Sailors on Socotra. The inscriptions and drawings from the Cave of Hoq. Bremen 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Spar, I., von Dassow, E.
    Cuneiform Texts in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Volume III: Private Archive Texts from the First Millennium B.C. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stark, R., Finke, R.
    Beyond Church and Sect: Dynamics and Stability in Religious Economics, [in:] T. G. Jelen (ed.) Sacred Markets, Sacred Canopies: Essays on religious markets and religious pluralism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield 2002, pp.31–62.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Toulmin, S.
    The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1958; revised edition 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
    Rules for argumentation in dialogues, Argumentation2(4): 499–510 1988 10.1007/BF00128989
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128989 [Google Scholar]
42. Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
    Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Foris publications 1984 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
43. Van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., Henkemans, A. F. S.
    Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Vol.121. Springer Science & Business Media 2007 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6244‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5 [Google Scholar]
44. Wallerstein, I.
    A World-System Perspective on the Social Sciences, The British Journal of Sociology271: 343–352 1976 10.2307/589620
    https://doi.org/10.2307/589620 [Google Scholar]
45. Walton, D.
    Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Series: Studies in Argumentation Theory. Routledge 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Witek, M., Witczak-Plisiecka, I.
    Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions. Brill 2019 10.1163/9789004366527
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366527 [Google Scholar]
47. Wittgenstein, L.
    Philosophical Investigations trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan 1958.
    [Google Scholar]