Cracking the code of Jesus’s parables with argumentation analysis

References

1. Hietanen, Mika
   2005 Paul’s Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis. LNTS 344. London/New York: T&T Clark.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Hitchcock, David, and Bart Verheij
   eds: Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument, Analysis and Evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Lahti, Niilo
   2017 The Maneuvering Paul: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of Paul’s Argumentation in First Corinthians 4:18–7:40. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Eastern Finland.
4. Luz, Ulrich
   1989 Matthew 1–7. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Luz, Ulrich
   2005 Matthew 21–28. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.
   [Google Scholar]
6. O’Banion, John D.
   1987 “Narration and Argumentation: Quintilian on Narratio as the Heart of Rhetorical Thinking.” Rhetorica5 (4):325–351. 10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.325
   https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.325 [Google Scholar]
7. Olbricht, Thomas H.
   2008 “Rhetorical Criticism in Biblical Commentaries.” Currents in Biblical Research7 (1):11–36. 10.1177/1476993X08094023
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X08094023 [Google Scholar]
8. Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
   1958 Traité de l’argumentation:la nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Translated: Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Pluijm, Lester C., and Jacky Visser
   2011 “David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument, Analysis and Evaluation.” Argumentation251:527–539. 10.1007/s10503‑011‑9214‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y [Google Scholar]
10. Siegert, Folker
    1984 Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Röm 9–11. WUNT I/34. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Snodgrass, Klyne R.
    2008 Stories with Intent – A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Thurén, Lauri
    1995 Argument and Theology in 1 Peter: The Origins of Christian Paraenesis. JSNTSup 114. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Thurén, Lauri
    2001 “John Chrysostom as a Rhetorical Critic: The Hermeneutics of an Early Father.” Biblical Interpretation91:180–218. 10.1163/156851501300139291
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156851501300139291 [Google Scholar]
14. Thurén, Lauri
    2002 “Is There Biblical Argumentation?” InRhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts, ed. byAnders Eriksson, Thomas H. Olbricht, and Walter Übelacker, 77–92. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Thurén, Lauri
    2014 Parables Unplugged: Reading the Lukan Parables in Their Rhetorical Context, Minneapolis: Fortress. 10.2307/j.ctt9m0vdv
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9m0vdv [Google Scholar]
16. Thurén, Lauri
    2017 “Multiple Communication Layers and the Enigma of the Last Judgment (Matt 25,31–46).” InMultiple Teachers in Biblical Texts, ed. byA. L. H. M. van Wieringen and B. J. Koet, 125–146. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 88. Leuven: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Thurén, Lauri
    2020 ”The Final Countdown: The Last Judgment in the Light of Narratology and Argumentation Analysis.” InHistory and Theology in the Gospels: Moscow Conference, ed. byTobias Nicklas, Karl-Wilhelm Niebuhr, and Mikhail Seleznev. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 289–302.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Thurén, Lauri
    2021 ”Parables in the Sermon on the Mount: a Cognitive and Rhetorical Perspective.” InSocial and Cognitive Perspectives on the Sermon on the Mount, ed. byRikard Roitto, Colleen Shantz, Petri Luomanen. Studies in Ancient Religion and Culture. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing, 174–204.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Toulmin, Stephen Edelston
    1958 The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Toulmin, Stephen Edelston, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik
    1984 An Introduction to Reasoning. 2d ed.New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
22. Verheij, Bart
    2005 ‘‘Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.” Argumentation19 (3): 347–371. 10.1007/s10503‑005‑4421‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-005-4421-z [Google Scholar]
23. Wolter, Michael
    2002 “Lk 15 als Streitgespräch.” ETL781:25–56. 10.2143/ETL.78.1.584
    https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.78.1.584 [Google Scholar]
24. Zimmermann, Ruben
    2015 Puzzling the Parables of Jesus: Methods and Interpretation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. 10.2307/j.ctt155j2q7
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt155j2q7 [Google Scholar]
25. http://www.eurel.info/spip.php?rubrique547
    www.eurel.info/spip.php?rubrique547.