1887
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-4742
  • E-ISSN: 2211-4750
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews How philosophers argue: An adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate

 

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.22014.gas
2023-09-15
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eemeren, Frans H. van
    2018Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnson, Ralph H.
    2000Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Leal, Fernando
    2020 “On the importance of questioning within the ideal model of critical discussion.” Argumentation341: 405–431. 10.1007/s10503‑020‑09516‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09516-0 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2021 “On questions in standard pragma-dialectics.” Quadripartita Ratio6(11): 41–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Marraud, Hubert
    2007 “La analogía como transferencia.” Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science22(2): 167–188. 10.1387/theoria.466
    https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.466 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013¿Es lógic@? Análisis y evaluación de argumentos. Madrid: Cátedra.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017 “De las siete maneras de contraargumentar.” Quadripartita Ratio2(4): 52–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2021 “Cuatro modelos de argumento.” Quadripartita Ratio6(11): 17–40.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.22014.gas
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error