The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām

References

1. al-Abharī, Athīr al-Dīn Mufaḍḍal ibn ʿUmar
   2012 Īsāgūjī. Istanbul: Hāshimī.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abū Zahra, Muḥammad
   1934 Tārīkh al-jadal. Cairo: Dār al-Fikr al-ʾArabi.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arnaldez, Roger
   1991 “Manṭiḳ.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.61, 442–452. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Astren, Fred
   2010 “Qirqisānī, Jacob al-.” InEncyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World, ed. byNorman A. Stillman, and Phillip I. Ackerman-Lieberman, vol.41, 136–140. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bearman, Peri J., et al
   2009 “The Encyclopaedia of Islam: Glossary and Index of Terms to Volumes I-XI and to the Supplement.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, index volume, 142–592. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Belhaj, Abdessamad
   2016 “Ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara: The Neglected Art of Disputation in Later Medieval Islam.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy261: 291–307. 10.1017/S0957423916000059
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423916000059 [Google Scholar]
7. Blankinship, Khalid
   2008 “The Early Creed.” InThe Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology, ed. byTim Winter, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL9780521780582.003
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521780582.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Brockelmann, Carl
   1960 “al-Abharī.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.11, 98–99. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Çapak, Ibrahim
   2013 “Mantik.” InIslam felsefesi: Tarih ve problemler, ed. byCüneyt M. Kaya, 541–568. Istanbul: ISAM.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Çapak, Ibrahim
    2005 “Saçaklızade’ye göre münazara ilmi.” InI. Kahramanmaraş sempozyumu, ed. bySaid Öztürk, Mahmut Nedim Tepebaşı, Hacı Kutlu, and Mustafa Bekerecioğlu, 89–98. Istanbul: Maraşde.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Carter, M. G., and G. J. H. van Gelder
    2000 “Tamt̲h̲īl.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.101, 179–180. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Caspar, Robert
    1998 A Historical Introduction to Islamic Theology: Muhammad and the Classical Period. Rome: PISAI.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Çelebi, İlyas, and Bekir Topaloğlu
    2010 Kelâm terimleri sözlüğü. Istanbul: ISAM.
    [Google Scholar]
14. El-Rouayheb, Khaled
    2010 Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic, 900–1900. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/ej.9789004183193.i‑296
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004183193.i-296 [Google Scholar]
15. El-Rouayheb, Khaled
    2016 “Theology and Logic.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. bySabine Schmidtke, 408–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Enriques, Federigo
    1927 Zur Geschichte der Logik: Grundlagen und Aufbau der Wissenschaft im Urteil der mathematischen Denker, trans. byLudwig Bieberbach. Wiesbaden: Vieweg and Teubner. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑15731‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-15731-1 [Google Scholar]
17. Gabrieli, F.
    1960 “Baḥt̲h̲.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.11, 949. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gardet, Louis
    1960 “Al-Burhān.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.11, 1326–1327. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gelenbevî, İsmail ibn Mustafa ibn Mahmud
    2013 Ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara, ed. byKhālid ibn Khalīl ibn Ibrāhīm al-Zāhidī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gelenbevî, İsmail ibn Mustafa ibn Mahmud
    2019 “Burhân-ı Gelenbevî.” InAbdünnâfî İffet Efendi, Tercüme-i Burhân-ı Gelenbevî, ed. byIbrahim Çapak Istanbul: Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gölcük, Şerafettin, and Yurdagür, Metin
    1996 “Gelenbevî.” InTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by theTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol.131, 552–555. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goldman, Alvin I.
    1999 Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon. 10.1093/0198238207.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0198238207.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Groff, Peter S., and Oliver Leaman
    2007 Islamic Philosophy A–Z. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748629275
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748629275 [Google Scholar]
24. Gutas, Dimitri
    1998 Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʻAbbāsid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10th Centuries). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203316276
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203316276 [Google Scholar]
25. Gwynne, Rosalind Ward
    2009 Logic, Rhetoric and Legal Reasoning in the Qurʾān: God’s Arguments. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hallaq, Wael B.
    1993 “Introduction.” InIbn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians, trans. with an introduction and notes byWael B. Hallaq, xi–lvii. Oxford: Clarendon Press [repr. 2001]. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240433.002.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240433.002.0009 [Google Scholar]
27. Ibn SīnāI. Madkour
    Ibn Sīnā 1952 Al-Shifāʾ, ed byI. Madkour. Cairo: Al-Maṭbaʿa al-Amīriyya.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān
    . n.d.Al-Mawāqif fī ʿilm al-kalām. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ince, Serkan
    2023 Argumentation und Apologetik. Argumentation und erkenntnistheoretische Prinzipien der al-Radd ʿalā al-Naṣārā-Literatur unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Werkes des Ṣāliḥ ibn al-Ḥusayn al-Jaʿfarī (gest. 668/1270). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Karabela, Mehmet
    2011 The Development of Dialectic and Argumentation Theory in Post-Classical Islamic Intellectual History. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kaya, Eyyüp Said
    2010 “Taklid.” InTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by theTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol.391, 461–465. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lumer, Christoph
    1988 “The Disputation. A Special Type of Cooperative Argumentative Dialogue.” Argumentation21: 441–464. 10.1007/BF00128986
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128986 [Google Scholar]
33. Lumer, Christoph
    1990 Praktische Argumentationstheorie: Theoretische Grundlagen, praktische Begründung und Regeln wichtiger Argumentationsarten. Braunschweig: Vieweg. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑19710‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-19710-2 [Google Scholar]
34. Lumer, Christoph
    2005a “Introduction. The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation: A Map.” Informal Logic25 (3): 189–212. 10.22329/il.v25i3.1134
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v25i3.1134 [Google Scholar]
35. Lumer, Christoph
    2005b “The Epistemological Theory of Argument – How and Why?” Informal Logic25 (3): 213–243. 10.22329/il.v25i3.1135
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v25i3.1135 [Google Scholar]
36. Lumer, Christoph
    2007 “Überreden ist gut, überzeugen ist besser! Argumentativer [sic] Ethos in der Rhetorik.” InPersuasion und Wissenschaft: Aktuelle Fragestellungen von Rhetorik und Argumentationstheorie, ed. byGünther Kreuzbauer, Norbert Gratzl, and Ewald Hiebl, 7–33. Vienna: Lit.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Makdisi, George
    1974 “Dialectic and Disputation: The Relation between the Texts of Qirqisani and Ibn ʿAqil.” InMélanges d’islamologie: Volume dédié à la mémoire de Armand Abel, ed. byPierre Salmon, vol.11, 201–206. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004659407_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004659407_017 [Google Scholar]
38. al-Masʿūdī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn
    1986 Murūj al-dhahab wa-maʿādin al-jawhar, ed. byMufīd Muḥammad Qumayḥa. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Miller, Larry Benjamin
    1995 “al-Samarḳandī, S̲h̲ams al-Dīn.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.81, 1038–1039. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Özcan, Tahsin
    2008 “Saçaklızâde Mehmed Efendi.” InTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by theTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol.351, 368–3670. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Özen, Şükrü
    1998 “Hilâf.” InTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by theTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol.171, 527–538. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Özervarli, M. Sait
    . “Gelenbevi, İsmail.” InEncyclopaedia of Islam: Three ed. by Kate Fleet, Gudrun Krämer, Denis Matringe, John Nawas, and Devin J. Stewart. Leiden: Brill. referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/gelenbevi-i-smail-COM_27392
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rescher, Nicholas
    1964 The Development of Arabic Logic. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Russell, Bertrand
    2004 History of Western Philosophy. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203487976
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487976 [Google Scholar]
45. Saçaklızâde Maraşî, Mehmed
    1763 al-Risāla al-waladīya fī fann al-munāẓara, MS Budapest, Arab O. 069/Coll. 9, fols. 136r-146v (dated 1177/1763).
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schaade, A.
    1913 “Balāg̲h̲a.” InEncyclopaedia of Islam, ed. byMartin T. Houtsma, T. W. Arnold, R. Basset, and R. Hartmann, vol.11, 637. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Steinschneider, Moritz
    1893 Die arabischen Übersetzungen aus dem Griechischen. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stroumsa, Sarah
    1999 “Ibn al-Rāwandī’s sūʾ adab al-mujādala: The Role of Bad Manners in Medieval Disputations.” InThe Majlis: Interreligious Encounters in Medieval Islam, ed. byHava Lazarus-Yaffe, Mark R. Cohen, Sasson Somekh, and Sidney H. Griffith, 60–76. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Stock, Kristina
    2005 Arabische Stilistik. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ṭaşköprüzâde, Ahmed Efendi
    1990 “Ādāb al-baḥth wa-al-munāẓara”, ed. byAbdurrahim Güzel. Erciyes Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi71: 203–207.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Ṭaşköprüzâde, Ahmed Efendi
    1998 “Miftāḥ al-saʿāda wa-miṣbāḥ al-siyāda.” InMawsūʿat muṣṭalaḥāt Miftāḥ as-saʿāda wa-miṣbāḥ as-siyāda fī mawḍūʿāt al-ʿulūm, ed. byRafīq al-ʿAjam, and ʿAlī Dahrūj. Beirut: Maktabat Lubnān.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Topaloğlu, Bekir
    2016 Kelâm ilmine giriş. Istanbul: Damla.
    [Google Scholar]
53. al-Ṭūfī, Najm al-Dīn
    1987 ʿAlam al-jaḏal fī ʿilm al-jadal, ed. byWolfhart Heinrichs. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Üçer, İbrahim Halil
    2013 “Antik-Helenistik birikimin İslam dünyasına intikali: Aristotelesçi felsefenin üç büyük dönüşüm evresi.” InIslam felsefesi: Tarih ve problemler, ed. byCüneyt M. Kaya, 37–90. Istanbul: ISAM.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Ueding, Gert
    2005 Klassische Rhetorik. 4th. ed.München: C. H. Beck. 10.1515/9783110942385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110942385 [Google Scholar]
56. van den Berg, H.
    1936 “Manṭiḳ.” InEncyclopaedia of Islam, ed. byMartin T. Houtsma, T. W. Arnold, R. Basset, and R. Hartmann, vol.31, 280–283. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
57. van Eemeren, Frans Hendrik, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
    2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer Reference. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
58. van Ess, Josef
    1966 Die Erkenntnislehre des ʿAḍudaddīn Al-Īcī. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wagner, Ewald
    1993 “Munāẓara.” InThe Encyclopedia of Islam. New Edition, ed. byPeri J. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, Clifford Edmund Bosworth, E. Van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs, vol.71, 565–568. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Wagner, Ewald
    1963 Die arabische Rangstreitdichtung und ihre Einordnung in die allgemeine Literaturgeschichte. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Walzer, Richard
    1962 Greek into Arabic: Essays on Islamic Philosophy. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Yavuz, Yusuf Şevki
    2006 “Münâzara.” InTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by theTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol.311, 576–577. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Yavuz, Yusuf Şevki
    2011 “Taşköprizâde Ahmed Efendi.” InTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, ed. by theTürkiye Diyanet Vakfı, vol.401, 151–152. Istanbul: TDV Islâm Araştımaları Merkezi.
    [Google Scholar]