Tweeting fallacies

References

1. Blair, J. Anthony
   1995 “The place of teaching informal fallacies in teaching reasoning skills or critical thinking.” InFallacies: Classical and contemporary readings, ed. byHans V. Hansen, and Robert C. Pinto, 328–338. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blair, J. Anthony
   2023 “Teaching the fallacies.” Argumentation37(2): 247–251. 10.1007/s10503‑023‑09604‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09604-x [Google Scholar]
3. Boudry, Maarten, Fabio Paglieri, and Massimo Pigliucci
   2015 “The fake, the flimsy, and the fallacious: Demarcating arguments in real life.” Argumentation291: 431–456. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9359‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1 [Google Scholar]
4. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels
   2009 Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑2614‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9 [Google Scholar]
5. Finocchiaro, Maurice A.
   1981 “Fallacies and the evaluation of reasoning.” American Philosophical Quarterly181: 13–22.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Finocchiaro, Maurice A.
   1987 “Six types of fallaciousness: Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism.” Argumentation11: 263–282. 10.1007/BF00136778
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136778 [Google Scholar]
7. Finocchiaro, Maurice A.
   2007 “Arguments, meta-arguments, and metadialogues: A reconstruction of Krabbe, Govier, and Woods.” Argumentation211: 253–268. 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9055‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9055-x [Google Scholar]
8. Flew, Antony
   1975 Thinking about thinking. London: Fontana.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hitchcock, David
   1995 “Do the fallacies have a place in the teaching of reasoning skills or critical thinking?” InFallacies: Classical and contemporary readings, ed. byHans V. Hansen, and Robert C. Pinto, 319–327. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hundleby, Catherine
    2010 “The authority of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation.” Informal Logic301: 279–308. 10.22329/il.v30i3.3035
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v30i3.3035 [Google Scholar]
11. Jason, Gary
    1987 “Are fallacies common? A look at two debates.” Informal Logic81: 81–92.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair
    1994 Logical self-defense. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Massey, Gerald J.
    1975 “Are there any good arguments that bad arguments are bad?” Philosophy in Context41: 61–77. 10.5840/philcontext1975417
    https://doi.org/10.5840/philcontext1975417 [Google Scholar]
14. Massey, Gerald J.
    1981 “The fallacy behind fallacies.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy61: 489–500. 10.1111/j.1475‑4975.1981.tb00454.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1981.tb00454.x [Google Scholar]
15. Tindale, Christopher W.
    2007 Fallacies and argument appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511806544
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806544 [Google Scholar]
16. Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik
    1984 An introduction to reasoning. 2nd ed.New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Walton, Douglas N.
    1995 A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Willingham, Daniel T.
    2008 “Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?” Arts Education Policy Review1091: 21–32. 10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21‑32
    https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32 [Google Scholar]