oa Argumentation in shareholder activism

References

1. Andone, C., & Rocci, A.
   (2016) Argumentation in journalism: Professional practices and the public sphere. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(1), 1–8.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bigi, S.
   (2016) Communicating (with) care: A linguistic approach to the study of doctor-patient interactions. IOS Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bitzer, L.
   (1968) The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric11, 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brauer, M., Wiersema, M., & Binder, P.
   (2022) “Dear CEO and Board”: How Activist Investors’ Confidence in Tone Influences Campaign Success. Organization Science, 34(4), 1487–1508.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Budzynska, K., Rocci, A., & Yaskorska, O.
   (2014) Financial dialogue games: A protocol for earnings conference calls. InComputational models of argument (pp.19–30). IOS Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
   (2013) Rhetoric in financial discourse: A linguistic analysis of ICT-mediated disclosure genres (Vol.261). Amsterdam/NY: Rodopi.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
   (2018) Persuasion in earnings calls: A diachronic pragmalinguistic analysis. International Journal of Business Communication, 55 (3), 275-292.
   [Google Scholar]
8. D’Agostino, G.
   (2022) “(so long, and) thanks for all the color”. Requests of Elaboration and Answers They Trigger in Earnings Conference Calls. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3205/paper9.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
9. Damodaran, A.
   (2017) Narrative and numbers: The value of stories in business. Columbia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. de Oliveira, M. and S. Pereira
    (2018) Formulations in delicate actions: a study of analyst questions in earnings conference calls. International Journal of Business Communication, 551, 293–309.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ehninger, D. & Brockriede, W.
    (1961) Decision by debate. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Engine No. 1
    Engine No. 1 (2021) Reenergize Exxon. https://reenergizexom.com/
13. Filimon, I. A.
    (2009) Kyosei — an example of cultural keyword argumentatively exploited in corporate reporting discourse. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garssen, B.
    (2016) Problem-solving argumentative patterns in plenary debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25–43.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gâţă, A.
    (2015) The strategic function of argumentative moves in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports. Scrutinizing argumentation in practice, 91, 297.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Greco Morasso, S.
    (2011) Argumentation in Dispute Mediation. A reasonable way to handle conflict. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., Van Ruler, B., Verčič, D. and Sriramesh, K.
    (2007) Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hoffmann, C. P., Brønn, P. S., & Fieseler, C.
    (2016) A good reputation: Protection against shareholder activism. Corporate reputation review, 19(1), 35–46.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Icahn, C.
    (2022) Open Letter to Shareholders of McDonald’s Corporation. https://carlicahn.com/carl-c-icahn-files-definitive-proxy-statement-and-issues-open-letter-to-shareholders-of-mcdonalds-corporation/
20. Ihnen Jory, C.
    (2012) Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates: instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the second reading of the British Parliament. Sic Sat, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. H.
    (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Klopf, D. W. & McCroskey, J. C.
    (1969) The elements of debate. New York: Arco.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Koszowy, M., Budzynska, K., Pereira-Fariña, M., & Duthie, R.
    (2022) From theory of rhetoric to the practice of language use: The case of appeals to ethos elements. Argumentation, 361, 123–149.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Laskin, A. V.
    (2022) Investor Relations and Financial Communication: Creating Value Through Trust and Understanding. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lazard
    Lazard (2024) Annual Review of Shareholder Activism 2023. https://www.lazard.com/research-insights/annual-review-of-shareholder-activism-2023/
26. Lev, B.
    (2012) Winning investors over: Surprising truths about honesty, earnings guidance, and other ways to boost your stock price. Harvard Business Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lewiński, M., & Aakhus, M.
    (2023) Argumentation in complex communication: Managing disagreement in a polylogue. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lucchini, C., Rocci, A., & D’Agostino, G.
    (2022) Annotating Argumentation within Questions. Prefaced Questions as a Genre Specific Argumentative Pattern in Earnings Conference Calls. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3205/paper7.pdf
29. Marsh, C.
    (2006) The syllogism of apologia: Rhetorical stasis theory and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 41–46. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
30. Marsh, C.
    (2018) Stasis Theory: An Approach to Clarifying Issues and Developing Responses. InØ. Ihlen & R. L. Heath (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication (p.15). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781119265771.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119265771.ch12 [Google Scholar]
31. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.
    (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pollaroli, C., & Rocci, A.
    (2015) The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4(2), 158–199.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Palmieri, R.
    (2008) Reconstructing argumentative interactions in M&A offers. Studies in Communication Sciences, 8(2), 279–302.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Palmieri, R.
    (2012) The diversifying of contextual constraints and argumentative strategies in friendly and hostile takeover bids. In: Eemeren, F. H. van & B. Garssen (eds.), Exploring Argumentative Contexts (pp.343–375). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Palmieri, R.
    (2014) Corporate argumentation in takeover bids. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Palmieri, R.
    (2017) The role of argumentation in financial communication and investor relations. In: A. Laskin (Ed.), Handbook of Financial Communications and Investor Relations (pp.3–22). Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Palmieri, R., & Miecznikowski, J.
    (2016) Predictions in economic-financial news: author’s stance and argumentative loci. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(1), 48–73.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Palmieri, R., & Musi, E.
    (2020) Trust-repair strategies in crisis rhetorical (sub-) arenas: an argumentative perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(4), 272–293.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Palmieri, R., Rocci, A., & Kudrautsava, N.
    (2015) Argumentation in earnings conference calls. Corporate standpoints and analysts’ challenges. Studies in communication sciences, 15(1), 120–132.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rigotti, E., & Greco, S.
    (2019) Inference in argumentation. Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A.
    (2006) Towards a definition of communication context. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rocci, A.
    (2014) The discourse system of financial communication. Cahiers de l’ILSL, 341, 201–221.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rocci, A.
    (2015) Modals as lexical indicators of argumentation. A study of Italian economic-financial news. L’analisi linguistica e letteraria, 577–619.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rocci, A.
    (2021) Diagramming Counterarguments: At the Interface Between Discourse Structure and Argumentation Structure. In: Boogaart, R., Jansen, H., van Leeuwen, M. (eds) The Language of Argumentation (pp.143–166). Springer, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rocci, A.
    (in prep). “He knows nothing about topoi, let alone maxims”: Fillmorean constructions indexing maxims of Aristotelian topoi in enthymematic arguments.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Rocci, A., & Luciani, M.
    (2016) Economic-financial journalists as argumentative intermediaries. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(1), 88–111.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rocci, A., & Raimondo, C.
    (2017) Conference calls: A communication perspective. InA. V. Laskin (Ed.), The handbook of financial communication and investor relations (pp.293–308). John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Rocci, A., Yaskorska-Shah, O., D’Agostino, G., & Lucchini, C.
    (2024) Argumentative patterns initiated by closed-list questions in accountability dialogues. A corpus study of financial conference calls. 4th European Conference on Argumentation — ECA 2022 The Cognitive Dimension of Social Argumentation, 350–375.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ross, S. A.
    (1973) The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Strauß, N.
    (2023) Framing sustainable finance: A critical analysis of op-eds in the Financial Times. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(4), 1427–1440.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Uysal, N., Yang, A., & Taylor, M.
    (2018) Shareholder communication and issue salience: Corporate responses to ‘social’ shareholder activism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(2), 179–201.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van Eemeren, F. H.
    (2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Van Eemeren, F. H.
    (2011) In context: Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation, 25(2), 141–161.
    [Google Scholar]
54. van Eemeren, F. H.
    (2017) Context-dependency of argumentative patterns in discourse. Journal of argumentation in context, 6(1), 3–26.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
    (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Vuontisjärvi, T.
    (2013) Argumentation and socially questionable business practices: The case of employee downsizing in corporate annual reports. Scandinavian journal of management, 29(3), 292–313.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wiersema, M., Ahn, A., & Zhang, Y.
    (2020) Activist hedge fund success: The role of reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 41(13), 2493–2517.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Yaskorska-Shah, O., Rocci, A., & Reed, C.
    (2022) Conversation shaping questions: a taxonomy used for mapping argumentative dialogues in financial discourse. Proceedingsceur-ws.orgISSN, 1613, 0073. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3205/paper8.pdf
59. Yin, R. K.
    (2003) Designing case studies. Qualitative research methods, 5(14), 359–386.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Zampa, M.
    (2017) Argumentation in the newsroom. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H. & Werder, K. P.
    (2018) Strategic Communication: Defining the Field and its Contribution to Research and Practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12 (4), 487–505.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Ziegelmueller, G. W., Kay, J., & Dause, C. A.
    (1975) Argumentation: Inquiry and advocacy (3rd ed.). London: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]