Analogical reasoning and evidence transfer in evidence-based policy

References

1. Arras, John
   2017 Methods in Bioethics. The Way We Reason Now. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bartha, Paul
   2010 By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325539.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195325539.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Bartha, Paul
   2015 Analogy in the natural sciences: Meeting Hesse’s challenge. Philosophical Inquiries, 31, pp.47–68.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beauchamp, Tom & Childress, James
   2019 Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th edition). Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bohrnstedt, G., & Stecher, B.
   (eds.) 2002 What we have learned about class size reduction in California (Capstone Report). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cartwright, Nancy
   2012 Presidential Address: Will This Policy Work for You? Predicting Effectiveness Better: How Philosophy Helps. Philosophy of Science, 791, 973–989. 10.1086/668041
   https://doi.org/10.1086/668041 [Google Scholar]
7. Cartwright, Nancy, & Hardie, Jeremy
   2012 Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199841608.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199841608.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Davies, Karen Sue
   2011 “Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Framework”. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(2), pp.75–80. 10.18438/B8WS5N
   https://doi.org/10.18438/B8WS5N [Google Scholar]
9. Duarte d’Almeida, Luís, and Claudio Michelon
   2017 The structure of arguments by analogy in law. Argumentation, 311, 359–393. 10.1007/s10503‑016‑9409‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9409-3 [Google Scholar]
10. Finn, J., & Achilles, C.
    (1990) Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 271, 557–577. 10.3102/00028312027003557
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027003557 [Google Scholar]
11. Guarini Marcello, Butchart Amy, Smith Paul & Moldovan Andrei
    (2009) ‘Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide’, inInformal Logic291, pp.84–197. 10.22329/il.v29i2.1225
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i2.1225 [Google Scholar]
12. Hesse, Mary
    1966 Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ioannidis, Stavros & Psillos Stathis
    2017 In Defense of Methodological Mechanism: The Case of Apoptosis’. Axiomathes, 271, pp.601–619. 10.1007/s10516‑017‑9354‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9354-2 [Google Scholar]
14. Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, and Christopher Tindale
    2017 Analogical arguments: Inferential structures and defeasibility conditions. Argumentation, 311, 221–243. 10.1007/s10503‑016‑9406‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9406-6 [Google Scholar]
15. Merton, Robert
    1949 Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Richardson, W., Wilson, M., Nishikawa, J., & Hayward, R.
    (1995) The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions. ACP Journal Club, 123(3), A12–13. 10.7326/ACPJC‑1995‑123‑3‑A12
    https://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-1995-123-3-A12 [Google Scholar]
17. Shelley, Cameron
    2004 Analogy Counterarguments: A Taxonomy for Critical Thinking. Argumentation, 181, pp.223–238. 10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024025.45062.24
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ARGU.0000024025.45062.24 [Google Scholar]
18. Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
19. World Bank
    World Bank 1994 Impact Evaluation Report: India — Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition Project (Report No. 13783). Washington: World Bank.
    [Google Scholar]
20. World Bank
    World Bank 2005a Project Performance Assessment Report: Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Project (Report No. 32563). Washington: World Bank.
    [Google Scholar]
21. World Bank
    World Bank 2005b Maintaining momentum to 2015: an impact evaluation of interventions to improve maternal and child health and nutrition in Bangladesh (Report No. 34462) Washington: World Bank.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Weber, Erik, & Wang Qianru
    (2023) The structure of analogical reasoning in bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 261: 69–84. 10.1007/s11019‑022‑10123‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10123-x [Google Scholar]