Sharing a language, sharing the argumentative attitude?

References

1. Alvar, M.
   1996 Manual de dialectología hispánica. El español de España. El español de América. Barcelona: Ariel
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bañón, A.
   2002 Discurso e inmigración. Propuestas para el análisis de un debate social. Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bañón, A.
   2008 Mali y los inmigrantes malienses. Notas sobre la representación discursiva en el diario El País. InBañón, A. & Fornieles, J. (eds.), Manual sobre comunicación e inmigración (pp.171–200). San Sebastián: Gakoa.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berry, J.
   2001 A psychology of Immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (3), 615–631. 10.1111/0022‑4537.00231
   https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00231 [Google Scholar]
5. Berry, J.
   2005 Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 291, 697–712. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013 [Google Scholar]
6. Berry, J., Phinney, J., Sam, D. & Vedder, P.
   2006 Immigrant youth in cultural transition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9780415963619
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415963619 [Google Scholar]
7. Blas, J.
   (1999) Attitudes towards intradialect variation in Hispanic sociolinguistics. Estudios filológicos, 341, 47–72. 10.4067/s0071‑17131999003400005
   https://doi.org/10.4067/s0071-17131999003400005 [Google Scholar]
8. Cahuzac, P.
   1980 La división del español de América en zonas dialectales. Situación etnolingüística o semántico-dialectal. Lingüística Española Actual, 21: 385–461.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Caravedo, R.
   2012 La ciudad como espacios mentales y lingüísticos. Reflexiones sobre la variación diatópica del español. Orillas, 11: 2–17.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Charteris-Black, J.
    2009 Gran Bretaña como contenedor: metáforas sobre inmigración en la campaña electoral de 2005. Discurso & Sociedad, 3 (3), 467–494. 10.14198/dissoc.3.3.4
    https://doi.org/10.14198/dissoc.3.3.4 [Google Scholar]
11. Cisneros, J. D.
    2008 Contaminated Communities: The Metaphor of “Inmigrant as Pollutant” in Media Representations of immigration. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 11 (4), 569–601. 10.1353/rap.0.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0068 [Google Scholar]
12. Croucher, S. M.
    2013 Integrated threat theory and acceptance of immigrant assimilation: An analysis of Muslim immigration in Western Europe. Communication Monographs, 80(1), 46–62. 10.1080/03637751.2012.739704
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2012.739704 [Google Scholar]
13. Croucher, S. M.
    2009 How limiting linguistic freedoms influences the cultural adaptation process: An analysis of the French Muslim population. Communication Quarterly, 57(3), 302–318. 10.1080/01463370903109929
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903109929 [Google Scholar]
14. Croucher, S. M.
    2008 French-Muslims and the hijab: An analysis of identity and the Islamic veil in France. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37(3), 199–213. 10.1080/17475750903135408
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750903135408 [Google Scholar]
15. Croucher, S. M., Kelly, S., Condon, S. M., Campbell, E., Galy-Badenas, F., Rahmani, D., Zeng, C. and Nshom, E.
    2018 A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between cultural adaptation and argumentativeness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29 (1), 91–108. 10.1108/IJCMA‑05‑2017‑0045
    https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2017-0045 [Google Scholar]
16. Debowska-Kozlowska, K., & Hample, D.
    2022 Agreement builds and disagreement destroys: How Polish undergraduates and graduates understand interpersonal arguing. Argumentation, 36(3), 365–392. 10.1007/s10503‑022‑09570‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w [Google Scholar]
17. Domenech, E.
    2013 Las migraciones son como el agua: Hacia la instauración de políticas de « control con rostro humano ». Polis. Revista Latinoamericana, 351, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Flores, L.
    2003 Constructing Rhetorical Borders: Peons, Illegal Aliens, and Competing Narratives of Inmigration. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20 (4), 362–387. 10.1080/0739318032000142025
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0739318032000142025 [Google Scholar]
19. Gallardo, A.
    1978 Hacia una teoría del idioma estándar’. RLA, 141: 85–119.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Greco, S.
    2013 Multivoiced decisions. A study of migrants’ inner dialogue and its connection to social argumentation. Pragmatics & Cognition, 21 (1), 55–80. 10.1075/pc.21.1.03mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.1.03mor [Google Scholar]
21. Greco, S.
    2014 Argumentation From Analogy in Migrants’ Decisions. Envan Eemeren, F. & Garssen, B. (eds.), ISSA Proceedings 2014 (pp.1–10). Amsterdam: Rozenberg Quarterly. 10.1075/aic.9.15gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.15gre [Google Scholar]
22. Hample, D.
    2005 Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410613486
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613486 [Google Scholar]
23. Hample, D.
    2018 Interpersonal arguing. New York: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b12877
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b12877 [Google Scholar]
24. Hample, D. & Anagondahalli, D.
    2015 Understandings of Arguing in India and the United States: Argument Frames, Personalization of Conflict, Argumentativeness, and Verbal Aggressiveness. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 10.1080/17475759.2014.1000939
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2014.1000939 [Google Scholar]
25. Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M.
    1995 A Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the instrument. Communication Quarterly, 431, 297–319. 10.1080/01463379509369978
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379509369978 [Google Scholar]
26. Hample, D., Leal, F., & Suro, J.
    2021 Arguing in Mexico: How uniquely Mexican is it?Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50 (4), 389–408. 10.1080/17475759.2021.1910066
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1910066 [Google Scholar]
27. Hample, D., Warner, B. & Young, D.
    2009 Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments. Argumentation, 231: 21–37. 10.1007/s10503‑008‑9107‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9107-x [Google Scholar]
28. Hofstede, G.
    2025 https://exhibition.geerthofstede.com/hofstedes-globe/
29. Hofstede, G.
    2001 Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2d. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hoogenboom, L. M., Dijkstra, M. T., & Beersma, B.
    2024 Conflict personalization: a systematic literature review and the development of an integrative definition. International Journal of Conflict Management, 35(2), 309–333. 10.1108/IJCMA‑09‑2022‑0142
    https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-09-2022-0142 [Google Scholar]
31. Infante, D. A., Myers, S. A., & Buerkel, R. A.
    1994 Argument and verbal aggression in constructive and destructive family and organizational disagreements. Western Journal of Communication, 58(2), 73–84. 10.1080/10570319409374488
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374488 [Google Scholar]
32. Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S.
    1982 A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 461, 72–80. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13 [Google Scholar]
33. Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J.
    1986 Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 531, 61–69. 10.1080/03637758609376126
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126 [Google Scholar]
34. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas
    Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas 2023 Estimación de personas extranjeras Residentes habituales en Chile al 31 de diciembre de 2022. Distribución regional y comunal. RetrievedJune 17, 2024: file:///C:/Users/Gebruiker/AppData/Local/Temp/ca426f7a-1e07-4687-870e-87bf4140df17_Estimacion-2022.zip.f17/Estimacion-2022/Informe%20de%20resultados%20Nacional%20Estimaci%C3%B3n%202022.-VF.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
35. Khomenko, I., & Hample, D.
    2018, July. Comparative analysis of arguing in Ukraine and the USA. Paper presented at themeeting of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Khomenko, I., Santibánez, C., & Hample, D.
    2023, July. Connections between age and interpersonal arguing in Ukraine, with speculations about war’s effects. Paper presented toInternational Society for the Study of Argumentation, Leiden, NL.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Levine, T. R., Beatty, M. J., Limon, S., Hamilton, M. A., Buck, R., & Chory-Assad, R. M.
    2004 The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. Communication Monographs, 71(3), 245–268. 10.1080/0363452042000299911
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000299911 [Google Scholar]
38. Lewiński, M., Hample, D., Sàáguaa, J. & Mohammed, D.
    2018 Arguing in Portugal: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 11 (3), 233–253. 10.1080/17513057.2018.1450888
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1450888 [Google Scholar]
39. Mamberti, J. & Hample, D.
    2022 Interpersonal arguing in Argentina. Argumentation and Advocacy, 58(4), 214–231. 10.1080/10511431.2022.2137984
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2022.2137984 [Google Scholar]
40. Núñez, L. & Stefoni, C.
    2004 Migrantes Andinos en Chile: ¿Transnacionales o Sobrevivientes?Revista Enfoques, 31, 103–123.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Piñero Piñero, G., Díaz Peralta, M., & García Domínguez, M. J.
    (2015) Argumentación y metáfora en el discurso político en torno a la inmigración. Arbor, 191(772), a224. 10.3989/arbor.2015.772n2010
    https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.772n2010 [Google Scholar]
42. Rancer, A. S., & Avtgis, T. A.
    2014 Argumentative and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application, 2d. ed.New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rancer, A. S., Kosberg, R. L., & Baukus, R. A.
    1992 Beliefs about arguing as predictors of trait argumentativeness: Implications for training in argument and conflict management. Communication Education, 41(4), 375–387. 10.1080/03634529209378899
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529209378899 [Google Scholar]
44. Riegert, K. & Hovden, J.
    2019 Identity, Empathy and Argument: Immigrants in Culture and Entertainment Journalism in the Scandinavian Press. Javnost — The Public, 10.1080/13183222.2019.1589279
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1589279 [Google Scholar]
45. Rojas, D. & Avilés, T.
    (2013) Actitudes hacia dialectos del español usados por inmigrantes en Santiago de Chile. Boletín de Filología, XLVIII (2), 97-117. 10.4067/s0718‑93032013000200005
    https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-93032013000200005 [Google Scholar]
46. Santa Ana, O.
    2003 Three mandates for anti-minority policy expressed in U.S. public discourse metaphors. EnDirven, R. & Pütz, M. (eds.), Cognitive Models in Language and Thought. Ideology, Metaphors and Meanings (pp.199–227). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Santibáñez, C.
    2019 Generosos y empáticos o ¿pragmáticos y utilitaristas?: los argumentos del adulto mayor chileno frente a un dilema social. Revista de Lingüística y Literatura, 751, 174–208.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Santibáñez, C. & Hample, D.
    2015 Orientations toward Interpersonal Arguing in Chile. Pragmatics, 23 (3), 453–476.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Santibáñez, C., Hample, D., & Hample, J.
    2021 How do Chilean seniors think about arguing?Journal of Argumentation in Context, 10(2), 202–225. 10.1075/jaic.20002.san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20002.san [Google Scholar]
50. Seibold, D. R., & Meyers, R. A.
    2007 Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program. Small Group Research, 38(3), 312–336. 10.1177/1046496407301966
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407301966 [Google Scholar]
51. Silva-Corvalán, C. & Enrique-Arias, A.
    2017 Sociolingüística y pragmática del español. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Soto-Alvarado, S., Garrido-Castillo, J., & Gil-Alonso, F.
    2022 Discourses About the Reasons for Migrating to Chile. From Expulsion to Seeking Professional Fulfilment. Migraciones internacionales, 131.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Stang, F. & Stefoni, C.
    2016 La microfísica de las fronteras. Criminalización, racialización y expulsabilidad de los migrantes colombianos en Antofagasta, Chile. Revista Astrolabio, 771, 42–80. 10.55441/1668.7515.n17.15781
    https://doi.org/10.55441/1668.7515.n17.15781 [Google Scholar]
54. Tijoux, M.
    2016 Racismo en Chile. La piel como marca de la inmigración. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tijoux, M.
    2013a Las escuelas de la inmigración en la ciudad de Santiago: elementos para una educación contra el racismo. Polis. Revista Latinoamericana, 12 (35), 287–307. 10.4067/S0718‑65682013000200013
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-65682013000200013 [Google Scholar]
56. Tijoux, M.
    2013b Niños(as) marcados por la inmigración peruana: estigma, sufrimientos, resistencias. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 20 (61), 83–104.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Tijoux, M.
    2011 Negando al “otro”: el constante sufrimiento de los inmigrantes peruanos en Chile. EnStefoni, C. (Ed.), Mujeres inmigrantes en Chile: ¿mano de obra o trabajadoras con derechos (pp.15–42). Santiago: Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Trapp, R., & Hoff, N.
    1985 A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 221, 1–11. 10.1080/00028533.1985.11951297
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1985.11951297 [Google Scholar]
59. Vuchinich, S.
    1990 The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. InA. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Conflict talk (pp.118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Waheed, M. & Hample, D.
    (2019) Interpersonal arguing in Malaysia and how it compares to the U.S., India, and China. China Media Research, 15(3), 50–70. www.chinamediaresearch.net
    [Google Scholar]
61. Xie, Y., Hample, D. & Wang, X.
    2015 A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Argument Predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, Verbal Aggressiveness, Argument Frames, and Personalization of Conflict. Argumentation, 29(3), 265–284. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9352‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8 [Google Scholar]
62. Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T.
    2011 Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing231, 193–210.
    [Google Scholar]