oa Deceptiveness as a tactic in political English

References

1. Annals
   Annals 1834 = The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States; with an Appendix, Containing Important State Papers and Public Documents, and All the Laws of a Public Nature; with a Copious Index. Vol.: comprising (with Vol. 2) the Period from March 3, 1789, to March 3, 1791, inclusive. Compiled from Authentic Materials byJoseph Gales, Sr. Washington: Gales and Seaton.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arp, Robert, Steven Barbone, and Michael Bruce
   2019 Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy. Glasgow: Wiley Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Banning, Lance
   1995 The Sacred Fire of Liberty. James Madison and the Founding of the Federal Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bentham, Jeremy
   1962 [1824, 1952] In Larrabee, H. A. Rev. Edn. The Handbook of Political Fallacies. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bird, Wendell
   2020 The Revolution in Freedoms of the Press and Speech: From Blackstone to the First Amendment and Fox’s Libel Act. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197509197.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509197.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Bowling, Kenneth
   1990 Politics in the First Congress. New York: Garland Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Collier, Christopher
   1971 Roger Sherman’s Connecticut: Yankee Politics and the American Revolution. Middleton, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Copi, Irving, and Keith Burgess-Jackson
   1996 Informal Logic. 3rd edn.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Curtis, Michael
   2000 Free Speech, “The People’s Darling Privilege”: Struggles for Freedom of Expression in American History. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822381068
   https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381068 [Google Scholar]
10. Dynel, Marta
    2018 Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501507922
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922 [Google Scholar]
11. Dynel, Marta
    2020 “To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins.” Topics in Cognitive Science: –. 10.1111/tops.12379
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12379 [Google Scholar]
12. Fallis, Don
    2015 “Disinformation, Deception, and Politics.” InAmerican Political Culture: An Encyclopedia, ed. byMichael Shally-Jensen, Mark J. Rozell, and Ted G. Jelen, –. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fallis, Don
    2016 “Mis- and Dis-information.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Information, ed. byLuciano Floridi, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fallis, Don
    2019 “Lying and Omissions.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Lying, ed. byJörg Meibauer, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gibbs, Raymond
    1999 Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164054 [Google Scholar]
16. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, vol., ed. byPeter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, –. New York: Academic. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
17. Grimshaw, Allen
    1987 “Disambiguating Discourse: Members’ Skill and Analysts’ Problem.” Social Psychology Quarterly (): –. 10.2307/2786751
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786751 [Google Scholar]
18. Grimshaw, Allen
    1989 “Data and Data Use in the Analysis of Communicative Events.” InExplorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. byRichard Bauman, and Joel Shelton, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611810.027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611810.027 [Google Scholar]
19. Grimshaw, Allen
    1990 “Research on Conflict Talk: Antecedents, Resources, Findings, Directions.” InConflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. byAllen Grimshaw, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hansen, Hans
    2002 “The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of ‘Fallacy.’” Argumentation: –. 10.1023/A:1015509401631
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015509401631 [Google Scholar]
21. Hansen, Hans
    2024 “Fallacies.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 edition), ed. byEdward Zalta and Uri Nodelman, https://plato.stanford.edu (AccessedJanuary 2025)
    [Google Scholar]
22. Horn, Laurence
    2017a “Telling it Slant: Toward a Taxonomy of Deception.” InThe Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse, ed. byJanet Giltrow and Dieter Stein, –. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501504723‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723-002 [Google Scholar]
23. Horn, Laurence
    2017b “What Lies Beyond: Untangling the Web.” InDoing Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives, ed. byRachel Giora and Michael Haugh, –. De Gruyter, Berlin. 10.1515/9783110546095‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110546095-009 [Google Scholar]
24. Horn, Laurence
    2022 “Introduction: On Lying and Disleading.” InFrom Lying to Perjury: Linguistic and Legal Perspectives on Lies and Other Falsehoods, ed. byLaurence Horn, –. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110733730‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733730-001 [Google Scholar]
25. Ketcham, Ralph
    1990 [1971] James Madison. A Biography. Charlottesville: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Labunski, Richard
    2006 James Madison and the Struggle for the Bill of Rights. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195181050.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195181050.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Madison, James
    1966 [1840] Notes on the Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787Reported byJames Madison. With an Introduction byAdrienne Koch. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Maillat, Didier, and Steve Oswald
    2009 “Defining Manipulative Discourse: The Pragmatics of Cognitive Illusions.” International Review of Pragmatics: –. 10.1163/187730909X12535267111651
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12535267111651 [Google Scholar]
29. McHangama, Jacob
    2022 Free Speech: A Global History from Socrates to Social Media. London: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nowak, John, and Ronald Rotunda
    1995 Constitutional Law. 5th edition. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
31. OED online = Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed
    OED online = Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed (1989) Available fromwww.oed.com. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (AccessedJanuary 2024.)
32. Reboul, Anne
    2017 “Is Implicit Communication a Way to Escape Epistemic Vigilance?” InPragmatics at Its Interfaces, ed. byStavros Assimakopoulos, –. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501505089‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505089-006 [Google Scholar]
33. Rudanko, Juhani
    2005 “The Fallacy of Ad Socordiam and Two Types of Speaker Intentions: A Case Study from the First Congressional Debate on the Bill of Rights in 1789.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.009 [Google Scholar]
34. Rudanko, Juhani
    2012 Discourses of Freedom of Speech. From the Enactment of the Bill of Rights to the Sedition Act of 1918. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rudanko, Juhani
    2021 Fallacies and Free Speech: Selected Discourses in Early America. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑67877‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67877-7 [Google Scholar]
36. Rudanko, Juhani, and Paul Rickman
    2022 Manipulative Fallacies in Early America: Studies on Selected Congressional Debates 1789 to 1799. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑99933‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99933-9 [Google Scholar]
37. Rudanko, Juhani, and Paul Rickman
    2024 “A Manipulative Technique in a Congressional Debate: A Case Study from 1789.” InUnlocking the History of English: Pragmatism, Prescriptivism and Text Types. Selected Papers from the 21st ICEHL, ed. byLuisella Caon, Moragh Gordon, and Thijs Porck, –. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.364.04rud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.364.04rud [Google Scholar]
38. Rudanko, Juhani, and Paul Rickman
    2025 Political Argumentation in Early America: Informal Fallacies in Selected Debates 1789 to 1800. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑83335‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83335-9 [Google Scholar]
39. Rutland, Robert Allen
    1983 [1955] The Birth of the Bill of Rights, 1776–1791. Revised ed.Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. de Saussure, Louis
    2005 “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. byLouis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.17.07sau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.07sau [Google Scholar]
41. Sherman, Roger
    1789 “Observations on the New Federal Constitution, and the Alterations That Have Been Proposed as Amendments.” The Salem Mercury, 30 June 1789.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sorlin, Sandrine
    2016 Manipulation in House of Cards: A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑55848‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55848-0 [Google Scholar]
43. Sorlin, Sandrine
    2017 “The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting (Im)politeness Theories.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002 [Google Scholar]
44. Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christoph Heinz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson
    2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2010.01394.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x [Google Scholar]
45. Van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Van Eemeren, Frans, and Bart Garssen
    2023 “The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited.” Argumentation: –. 10.1007/s10503‑023‑09605‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09605-w [Google Scholar]
47. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse and Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
48. Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]
49. Walton, Douglas
    2015 Goal-Based Reasoning for Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316340554
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316340554 [Google Scholar]