oa “You literally wrote this in your party manifesto”

References

1. Aijmer, Karin and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
   2003 “The discourse particle well and its equivalents in Swedish and Dutch.” Linguistics():–. 10.1515/ling.2003.036
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.036 [Google Scholar]
2. Andone, Corina
   2013 Argumentation in Political Interviews. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Andone, Corina
   2015 “The burden of proof in dealing with political accountability.” InPersuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue, ed. byRăzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Andone, Corina and Menno H. Reijven
   2024 “Quoting as an Argumentative Strategy in Dutch Televised Election Debates.” InNot My Words: How and Why Elected Officials Quote, Requote, and Misquote Others, ed. byOfer Feldman, –. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Antaki, Charles and Ivan Leudar
   2001 “Recruiting the record: Using opponents’ exact words in parliamentary argumentation.” Text():–.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Arnold-Murray, Katherine
   2021 “Multimodally constructed dialogue in political campaign commercials”. Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.014
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.014 [Google Scholar]
7. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1981 “Discourse in the novel.” InThe dialogic imagination, ed. byMichael Holquist, –. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. byCaryl Emerson. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
   https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1 [Google Scholar]
9. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
   1986 “The Problem of Speech Genres” InSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, –. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/720466‑005
   https://doi.org/10.7560/720466-005 [Google Scholar]
10. Bilmes, Jack
    1999 “Questions, answers, and the organization of talk in the 1992 vice presidential debate: Fundamental considerations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction():–. 10.1207/S15327973RL320301
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RL320301 [Google Scholar]
11. Bilmes, Jack
    2001 “Tactics and styles in the 1992 vice presidential debate: Question placement.” Research on Language and Social Interaction():–. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI34‑2_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-2_1 [Google Scholar]
12. Boydstun, Amber E., Rebecca A. Glazier, and Matthew T. Pietryka
    2013 “Playing to the crowd: Agenda control in presidential debates.” Political Communication():–. 10.1080/10584609.2012.737423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737423 [Google Scholar]
13. Buchstaller, Isabelle
    2017 “Reported speech.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byAnne Barron, Yueguo Gu and Gerard Steen, –. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315668925‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668925-30 [Google Scholar]
14. Buttny, Richard and Jodi R. Cohen
    2007 “Drawing on the Words of Others at Public Hearings: Zoning, Wal-Mart, and the Threat to the Aquifer.” Language in Society():–. 10.1017/S0047404507070674
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070674 [Google Scholar]
15. Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language():–. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
16. Clayman, Stephen E.
    1992 “Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse.” InTalk at Work, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Clayman, Stephen E.
    1995 “Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability.” Journal of Communication():–. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1995.tb00746.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00746.x [Google Scholar]
18. Clementson, David E.
    2019 “Why won’t you answer the question? Mass-mediated deception detection after journalists’ accusations of politicians’ evasion.” Journal of Communication():–. 10.1093/joc/jqz036
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz036 [Google Scholar]
19. Cooren, François, and Sergeiy Sandler
    2014 “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory():–. 10.1111/comt.12041
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12041 [Google Scholar]
20. Fetzer, Anita
    2020 “‘And I quote’: Forms and functions of quotations in Prime Minister’s questions.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.004 [Google Scholar]
21. Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
    2018 “‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse.” Discourse & Society():–. 10.1177/0957926518770259
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770259 [Google Scholar]
22. Fuller, Janet M.
    2003 “The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use.” Journal of Pragmatics, ():–. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00065‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00065-6 [Google Scholar]
23. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goldberg, Andreas C. and Carolin Ischen
    2020 “Be there or be square — The impact of participation and performance in the 2017 Dutch TV debates and its coverage on voting behavior.” Electoral Studies:. 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102171
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102171 [Google Scholar]
25. Hinck, Edward A.
    1993 Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Irving, Judith T.
    1996 “Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” InNatural Histories of Discourse, ed. byMichael Silverstein and Greg Urban, –. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jacobs, Scott, Sally Jackson and Xiaoqi Zhang
    2022 “What was the president’s standpoint and when did he take it? a normative pragmatic study of standpoint emergence in a presidential press conference.” Languages():. 10.3390/languages7020153
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020153 [Google Scholar]
28. Jones, Graham M. and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    2009 “Enquoting voices, accomplishing talk: Uses of be+ like in Instant Messaging.” Language & Communication():–. 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.09.003 [Google Scholar]
29. Kuo, Sai-Hua
    2001 “Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse Studies():–. 10.1177/1461445601003002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003002002 [Google Scholar]
30. Montiegel, Kristella and Jeffrey D. Robinson
    2019 ““First” matters: A qualitative examination of a strategy for controlling the agenda when answering questions in the 2016 US republican primary election debates.” Communication Monographs():–. 10.1080/03637751.2018.1498978
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1498978 [Google Scholar]
31. Reijven, Menno H.
    2024 ““So I know how to do this”. The prototypical argumentative pattern in USA presidential debates.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict():–. 10.1075/jlac.00098.rei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00098.rei [Google Scholar]
32. Reijven, Menno H., Alina Durrani and Gonen Dori-Hacohen
    (2023) ““And all of that”: The long list in political discourse.” Contrastive Pragmatics():–. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10075
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10075 [Google Scholar]
33. Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange
    1991 “The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress.” American speech():–. 10.2307/455799
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455799 [Google Scholar]
34. Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
    2009 “Quotation markers as intertextual codes in electoral propaganda.” Text & Talk():–. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.024 [Google Scholar]
35. Tannen, Deborah
    1986 “Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative.” InDirect and Indirect Speech, ed. byFlorian Coulmas, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871968.311
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.311 [Google Scholar]
36. Tannen, Deborah
    1995 “Waiting for the Mouse: Constructed Dialogue in Conversation.” InThe Dialogic Emergence of Culture, ed. byDennis Tedlock and Bruce Mannheim, –. Chicago: University of Illinois press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tannen, Deborah
    2007 Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
38. Truan, Naomi
    2021 “Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse: Constructing the ethos of the receptive politician.” Journal of Language and Politics():–. 10.1075/jlp.20018.tru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20018.tru [Google Scholar]
39. Van der Wouden, Ton, and Johanneke Caspers
    2010 “Nederlandse partikelbeschrijving in internationaal perspectief: waar zijn we eigenlijk en waar moet het toch naar toe?” Internationale Neerlandistiek():–. 10.5117/IVN2010.2.DERW
    https://doi.org/10.5117/IVN2010.2.DERW [Google Scholar]
40. Van Eemeren, Frans H.
    2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
41. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
42. Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    1992 Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Van Krieken, Kobie, José Sanders and Hans Hoeken
    2016 “Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives.” InViewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, ed. byBarbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu and Arie Verhagen, –. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110365467‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-007 [Google Scholar]
44. Voloshinov, Valentin N.
    1973 Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, transl.Ladislav Matejka and I. R. Titunik). Seminar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Weizman, Elda
    2020 “The discursive pattern ‘claim + indirect quotation in quotation marks’: Strategic uses in French and Hebrew online journalism.” Journal of Pragmatics:–. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.012 [Google Scholar]